This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Neuroscience Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Davidson College supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 April 2020 and 20 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rach and Williams.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

In this article, the recency effect is mentioned in reference to the forgetting curve individual's experience for the last 10-20 years of their life. Use of this term is incorrect. The recency effect is an effect where recall of (or memory for)the last few items on a list (or the most recently presented information) are outputted more quickly and judged with greater memory strength than items in the middle of the list (or information studied later). The first few and last few items of information studied have an advantage in recall over middle list items which are respectively termed primacy and recency effect. 128.233.84.235 20:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Something missing from the associative model is how people with the autobiographical memory condition are able to retrieve such memories both quickly and accurately, particularly considering the vast amount of memory information they are able to retain. Understanding this could make great strides in research of both cognitive and computer sciences.-- 71.245.164.83 ( talk) 00:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC) reply

The image File:Click film.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply

I think a reference to Superior autobiographical memory/Hyperthymesia should be added, but I can't find a suitable place. I saw a 60 Minutes episode about it (which is mentioned on the Hyperthymesia page). aditsu ( talk) 05:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

For our class project, we (Isling and Monelson) will be expanding the field vs. observer portion in the "types" section. We will explore the various factors that lead to the recall of memories in either the field or observer point of view. Some of the factors that affect memory perspective include culture, individualism, gender, and whether encoding of information was intentional or not. We will also be discussing how changes in these factors change the way people remember the same and different memories. Isling ( talk) 04:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Possible Sources: ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}

Other Possible Sources: ^{[6] [7] [8] [9] [10]} Monelson ( talk) 06:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi Isling and Monelson! I did not check all references you mentioned, but those I did check were all WP:primary sources, that is, results of single studies. However, Wikipedia is not an academic paper or essay! Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources (for instance, journal reviews and professional or advanced academic textbooks) and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources (such as undergraduate textbooks). WP:MEDRS describes how to identify reliable sources for medical information, which is a good guideline for many psychology articles as well. So please, reconsider your choice of sources and use secondary sources instead! With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 19:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Isaiah, I think if we wanted to combine any sections we could combine the Trauma Sections and then the Personal Identity from yours and the Sense of self from mine. These two seem to be the ones that are the closest, let me know what you think. Monelson ( talk) 22:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

FOR OUR PEER REVIEWERS: The time is approximately 8:09 PM and the date is March 22, 2013 to find our history. Thank you. Monelson ( talk) 00:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply

In a few places the language is misleading, and implies that field memories are copies. They may be from a first-person perspective, but that does not guarantee an accurate memory. What is so interesting is that observer memories are almost always reconstructions as it is very rare that one has access to that perspective during encoding. I will make minor edits to make sure the language reflects these distinctions. Elizareader ( talk) 03:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I am moving the whole section here. Reason is that this films are as relevant to the topic as any film in which a character talks about past events. Moreover all films are unreferenced. Unless sources implying that such films have been specially relevant for the comprenhension or evaluation of memory, that is, that they have changed our vision about autobiographical memory the should have no place in the article.

-- Garrondo ( talk) 21:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply

In popular culture

Many movies and television series recount tales of recollected memories, especially autobiographical memories in which the narrator recounts a significant time or event in their life. I leave them here in case somebody might be interested in collecting sources or moving the texts to more appropiate articles.

Film

• After Life, 1998, directed by Hirokazu Koreeda dealt with people in heaven having to choose a specific memory of an event to keep with them for all eternity.
• The Butterfly Effect, 2004, starring Ashton Kutcher involved a college student travelling through his memories in order to correct the events of his life that have gone wrong.
• Click, 2006, starring Adam Sandler told the story of a man who came across a remote control which allowed him to fast-forward and rewind to various stages and events in his life.
• Solaris, 2002, starring George Clooney involved an intelligent alien planet that manufactured beings based on the content of the character's autobiographical memory.
• Total Recall, 1990, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger references the implanting of false memories.
• Inception, 2010, starring Leonardo DiCaprio involved a team of people who venture into people's dreams and memories in order to find out information.

Television

• Being Erica, 2009, starring Erin Karpluk, whose character was sent back in time by her therapist to change specific events in her personal history for better or worse.
• Dollhouse, 2009, starring Eliza Dushku, where people were repeatedly 'mind-wiped' and implanted with new autobiographical memories based on the skill-sets and experiences they would need for various missions
• Unforgettable, 2011, starring Poppy Montgomery, where Carrie Wells uses her superior autobiographical memory to solve crimes. Actress Marilu Henner ( Taxi (TV series)), who has superior autobiographical memory, is a consultant for the CBS drama. Henner will guest star as Carrie's aunt; Carrie's mother has early-onset Alzheimer's disease.

I move here this section from the article: it was very large, and while it had some interesting sources there is no reason to think that any of them is specially relevant to "recommend" its reading over the potential thousands of possibles readins in the issue of autobiographical memory. If any of this is specially interesting it should be summarized and included as text in the article. I leave the section here so it can be used as a source of other sources not yet included in the article. -- Garrondo ( talk) 21:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply

• Banaji, Mahzarin R. & Crowder, Robert G (September 1989), "The bankruptcy of everyday memory research" (PDF), American Psychologist, 44 (9): 1185–1193, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1185{{ citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link) A seminal article on two primary research methods (experimental and ecological) and issues associated with each.

• Banaji, M.R. & Crowder, R.G (1991), "Some everyday thoughts on ecologically valid methods" (PDF), American Psychologist, 46 (1): 78–79, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.78{{ citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link). A response to some commentary on their article, and their attempt to clarify some of their points.

• Brockmeier, Jens (2010). After the archive: Remapping memory. Culture & Psychology, 16 (1), 5-35

• Cohen, Gillian & Conway, Martin A., ed. (2008), Memory in the real world (3rd ed.), New York: Psychology Press, ISBN  978-1-84169-641-6{{ citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list ( link)

• Fivush, Robyn & Nelson, Katherine (2004). Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15(9), 573-577.

• Fivush, Robyn, & Haden, Catherine A. (Eds.). (2003). Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• The Autobiographical Memory Discussion Forum. "www.autobiographicalmemory.info".

• Neisser, Ulric and Winograd, Eugene, ed. (1995), Remembering reconsidered: ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory, Emory Symposia in Cognition, Cambridge, U.K.: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, ISBN  0-521-48500-2{{ citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list ( link)

• Tulving, Endel & Fergus I. M. Craik, ed. (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Memory, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-512265-7

In subsection Autobiographical_memory#Moderators_of_perspective there is contradictory (and also rather confusing) information:

1. High levels of emotionality are correlated with field memories, whereas memories that are based on concrete facts are correlated with observer memories.<ref name="Nigro"/>
2. Other data has shown that emotionality of the individual at the time of encoding will more often yield an observer perspective than the field perspective.<ref name = "Sutin">
3. The emotional charge also impacts whether a memory is perceived when memories are associated with either positive or negative emotions they will more likely be recalled from the field perspective rather than the observer perspective, whereas memories that are not emotionally charged (neutral) are associated with the observer perspective rather than the field perspective.<ref name=Sutin />

I only have access to the abstracts, so it is difficult for me to know exactly what the sources say. However, number 1 and number 3 basically state the same thing: emotions --> field, facts --> observer, whereas number 2 states the opposite: emotions --> observer. Now number 2 and 3 have the same source!
My guess here, is that number 2 is a mistake and number 1 and 3 are correct.
Could anybody with access to the source please check if my guess is correct? Thank you! Lova Falk talk 13:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Problem solved and my guess was wrong! Thanks to this source I can now see it is the other way around. I'll change this. Lova Falk talk 14:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply

 Fixed

1. This section should elaborate on other important mechanisms that could be included in this section such as "the role of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms". 2. Identify what "memory maintenance" looks like within the sensory revisions, and how they "observe patterns of activity". Anacvalle ( talk) 05:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Ana Valle reply