This article was nominated for deletion on 31 October 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Neuroscience Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2012. Further details are available here.

This article needs to be streamlined and broken down for nonspecialists. The main problem is the giant chunk of journal text dumped in the middle. I haven't deleted it, because a more qualified editor may be able to trim some useful stuff out of it, but it needs a look... -- Dvyost 07:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC) reply

From Biosthmors

"Studies developed by Janata and Paroo show" is unnecessary in my opinion. Wikipedia always cares about the facts, not always the who/why/when of those facts, unless we're going to have a history section, for example. Biosthmors ( talk) 21:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

"Sing through “Jingle Bells” in your head and tell me" is not an encyclopedic tone. It sounds like the author of the article could be telling the reader to do something and asking for the reader to tell the author something. Biosthmors ( talk) 21:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your work on this Imran. See WP:HEADINGS for ways to fix up that formatting. More comments to come. Biosthmors ( talk) 22:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I see earworm is in the WP:See also section despite being in the body. It can be removed. Biosthmors ( talk) 22:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Why is motor imagery linked but not visual imagery? Red links are OK.

Consider removing the subheadings of "Tempo", "Pitch", "Verbal", and "Loudness". Just because it may go on an outline, doesn't necessarily mean readers need to see a subheading title.

See WP:REFSPACE for examples on where exactly to consistently place the references.

Why are the sources of "Communications, A. U. (2012). Involuntary Musical Imagery (earworms) - research by Lassi Liikkanen, Aalto University. aaltouniversity, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc5my6Lfipo" and "Liikkanen, L. A. New Directions for Understanding Involuntary Musical Imagery" reliable? Does this person publish in peer-reviewed literature (see WP:SPS)? I don't see the name cited to any other source in the article. Are you citing an interview? Thanks for your work! Biosthmors ( talk) 05:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply

And I don't quite grasp the first sentence/definition of the article. I think it should be made more accessible. I am tired though! Biosthmors ( talk) 05:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks Biosthmors I appreciate the feedback! - User:Imran Naim

I was reading the pitch section with made a claim that "Auditory image pitch detection studies have shown that response time increases when judging two high pitches as opposed to judging two low pitches.[2]" This directly contradicted an academic journal I was in the middle of reading. So I checked out the linked source and it said the the same thing as the source I was reading and not what the wikipedia article says. I don't know how to best edit this or if I'm missing something so I'm leaving that to someone else. Any here is the source I was talking about: Intons-Peterson, M. J., Russell, W., & Dressel, S. (1992). The role of pitch in auditory imagery. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 18(1), 233-240. 50.158.213.213 ( talk) 04:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Thank you 50.158.213.213 for your comment, and you're absolutely right. I fixed it. However, I would like to encourage you to be bold next time you find a mistake. Worst thing that can happen is that another editor reverts your edit, and well, that happens every now and again to all of us... Friendly regards! Lova Falk talk 10:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auditory imagery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160428105724/http://icmpc-escom2012.web.auth.gr/sites/default/files/papers/587_Proc.pdf to http://icmpc-escom2012.web.auth.gr/sites/default/files/papers/587_Proc.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 9 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mya.white. Peer reviewers: Madelynbrouwer, Sami.kasting, Angelmusicinthebrain.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 08:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply