This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
target for linkspammers, please don't delete/protect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakon ( talk • contribs) 04:54, October 18, 2006 (UTC)
For all I know this book may be a classic in its discipline, but this article certainly does not meet Wikipedia's requirements with regards to verifying notability, which makes it a candidate for deletion. __ meco ( talk) 10:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
target for linkspammers, please don't delete/protect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakon ( talk • contribs) 04:54, October 18, 2006 (UTC)
For all I know this book may be a classic in its discipline, but this article certainly does not meet Wikipedia's requirements with regards to verifying notability, which makes it a candidate for deletion. __ meco ( talk) 10:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)