This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Ascophyllum is very popular amongst the science community and has been claimed to be both the most active seaweed on the planet as well as the most researched by the academic community."
I consider this to be a clumsy paragraph! I would like to rewrite it however I don't have the reference noted and can't check it. Will consider. Osborne ( talk) 21:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the English/local names should be in italics. What do you think?
Unsigned editor removed facts claiming "references from 20 years ago not up-to-date". I am not qualified to say, but it seems to me like we shouldn't do that unless there's superceding references to replace them with. In any case, I changed the fact to indicate past tense, and cleaned up the wording, so I hope that helps. If there are new facts, please include them. B.S. Lawrence ( talk) 18:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
removed this sentence :
Ascophyllum is very popular amongst the science community and has been claimed to be both the best known seaweed on the planet as well as the most researched by the academic community.
because the reference quoted
T. L. Senn (1987). Seaweed and Plant Growth. Clemson, S.C.: T.L. Senn. p. 181 pp.
ISBN
0-939241-01-3.
does not say so, just :
The Norwegian ASCOPHYLLUM nodosum is to the author's knowledge the most widely researched type and his research has been confined mainly to this type. This is largely because the supply of the product is stable and the processing of the seaweed biomass is subject to rigid quality control.
Not really the same !
--
Channer (
talk) 18:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ascophyllum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ascophyllum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cobscook.org/reference/publications/GOM%20Rockweed%20Conference.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cobscook.org/cobscookBay/soundings/art9-rock2.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://new.bangordailynews.com/2010/06/29/news/rockweed-harvest-in-question-this-year/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GoldFinch14 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Chipmonkey9, Nsg1029, PvtBongo.
— Assignment last updated by Gmcb3345 ( talk) 23:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I am GoldFinch14, and I am working on this article as part of my college biology lab. I added information to every section of the article: description, reproduction, ecology, distribution, and uses. I also created a new section called Scientific Name History. Lastly, I added an image to the ecology section and links to other Wikipedia articles. I hope you like what I added/edited! GoldFinch14 ( talk) 22:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Ascophyllum is very popular amongst the science community and has been claimed to be both the most active seaweed on the planet as well as the most researched by the academic community."
I consider this to be a clumsy paragraph! I would like to rewrite it however I don't have the reference noted and can't check it. Will consider. Osborne ( talk) 21:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the English/local names should be in italics. What do you think?
Unsigned editor removed facts claiming "references from 20 years ago not up-to-date". I am not qualified to say, but it seems to me like we shouldn't do that unless there's superceding references to replace them with. In any case, I changed the fact to indicate past tense, and cleaned up the wording, so I hope that helps. If there are new facts, please include them. B.S. Lawrence ( talk) 18:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
removed this sentence :
Ascophyllum is very popular amongst the science community and has been claimed to be both the best known seaweed on the planet as well as the most researched by the academic community.
because the reference quoted
T. L. Senn (1987). Seaweed and Plant Growth. Clemson, S.C.: T.L. Senn. p. 181 pp.
ISBN
0-939241-01-3.
does not say so, just :
The Norwegian ASCOPHYLLUM nodosum is to the author's knowledge the most widely researched type and his research has been confined mainly to this type. This is largely because the supply of the product is stable and the processing of the seaweed biomass is subject to rigid quality control.
Not really the same !
--
Channer (
talk) 18:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ascophyllum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ascophyllum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cobscook.org/reference/publications/GOM%20Rockweed%20Conference.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cobscook.org/cobscookBay/soundings/art9-rock2.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://new.bangordailynews.com/2010/06/29/news/rockweed-harvest-in-question-this-year/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GoldFinch14 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Chipmonkey9, Nsg1029, PvtBongo.
— Assignment last updated by Gmcb3345 ( talk) 23:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I am GoldFinch14, and I am working on this article as part of my college biology lab. I added information to every section of the article: description, reproduction, ecology, distribution, and uses. I also created a new section called Scientific Name History. Lastly, I added an image to the ecology section and links to other Wikipedia articles. I hope you like what I added/edited! GoldFinch14 ( talk) 22:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)