This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this article should be deleted as it refers to something which does not exist. There are other articles which treat this subject properly as speculative fiction.
Benjamin Ostrow ( talk) 20:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
To develop this article, it should bring together material from:
as well as other sources, such as The Singularity is Near by Ray Kurzweil, and perspectives from Neuroscience.
It should address the issues of:
Someday I
Header text | Header text | Header text |
---|---|---|
Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example |
may have time to do this. If anyone else has the inclination, feel free. ----
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 00:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 18:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Updated ----
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 05:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Critics of the notion of brain death have sometimes argued that it could be invalidated by the futuristic existence of artificial brains, given that death in its broadest definition involves the entire body and that it happens on the cellular level, and not on any peculiar mnemonic level. Hence, if your brain unexpectedly dies, it might be replaced by one of these organic computer brains that would maintain your previous state of psychological consciousness, as one would store information on a computer disk. ADM ( talk) 07:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
A 2010 article which surveys large-scale simulations of brains: article (sorry, paywall). I think it could be a useful reference material. Ben T/ C 08:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Artificial brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Isn’t “an order of 100,000” times more than a megawatt 100 gigawatts? Supercomputers only consume a few megawatts, not many gigawatts. I’m not so sure that the so-called “current supercomputer” can possibly use anywhere near 100 GW of power.
EDIT: Haha, I beat you to it, robot! 73.208.153.86 ( talk) 23:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 20:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this article should be deleted as it refers to something which does not exist. There are other articles which treat this subject properly as speculative fiction.
Benjamin Ostrow ( talk) 20:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
To develop this article, it should bring together material from:
as well as other sources, such as The Singularity is Near by Ray Kurzweil, and perspectives from Neuroscience.
It should address the issues of:
Someday I
Header text | Header text | Header text |
---|---|---|
Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example |
may have time to do this. If anyone else has the inclination, feel free. ----
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 00:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 18:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Updated ----
CharlesGillingham (
talk) 05:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Critics of the notion of brain death have sometimes argued that it could be invalidated by the futuristic existence of artificial brains, given that death in its broadest definition involves the entire body and that it happens on the cellular level, and not on any peculiar mnemonic level. Hence, if your brain unexpectedly dies, it might be replaced by one of these organic computer brains that would maintain your previous state of psychological consciousness, as one would store information on a computer disk. ADM ( talk) 07:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
A 2010 article which surveys large-scale simulations of brains: article (sorry, paywall). I think it could be a useful reference material. Ben T/ C 08:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Artificial brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Isn’t “an order of 100,000” times more than a megawatt 100 gigawatts? Supercomputers only consume a few megawatts, not many gigawatts. I’m not so sure that the so-called “current supercomputer” can possibly use anywhere near 100 GW of power.
EDIT: Haha, I beat you to it, robot! 73.208.153.86 ( talk) 23:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at College Of Engineering Pune supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 20:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)