A fact from Art and emotion appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 November 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hi all, I'm working on this article as a school assignment, and it is in process now, but should be finished and prettied up by Nov. 20. Any suggestions you have would be welcome! For more info in our class visit our course page Rebeccaworrell ( talk) 14:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Also, in the personal and perhaps unrepresentative opinion of this groupuscule:
Pace, groupuscule ( talk) 11:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey Rebecca,
I really like both the content of the article and how you organized the information into categories. My main reviewing advice would be to go over the actual written work a little bit. When explaining some of the psychological concepts, you use a bunch of terms and ideas that might be difficult for non psych majors to understand, so for the average wikipedia user it might help to get some elaboration. Since you clearly did plenty of research it might also be interesting to elaborate on some of the theories you present: for example, in the five-step part to aesthetic experience it might be interesting to actually include the five parts you mention. There are also just some basic errors like an incomplete sentence or verb with the wrong punctuation here and there that should be easy to correct if you read through it carefully one more time. Other than that the article looks really good. Good work!
Geoff — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoffRodman ( talk • contribs) 18:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey Rebecca,
I like the content of the model and your organization as well as conciseness is impeccable. I agree with Geoff that you need to expand on things a bit. The conciseness is great and at least you got the style down but there are some terms that people that haven't been reading empirical research articles in psychology will be confused on. An example is this sentence under the Cognitive mastery and introduction of discrepancy: "It is at this point any discrepancies between expectations and the work, or the work and understanding arise." Please expand here because I am not really sure what you mean by understanding arise. Spell check, revise and read your article out loud. You will find grammatical mistakes that can be distracting. Also, get rid of the spaces after your periods before your citations.
Otherwise, great job! This article really adds and you have a lot of great research here. It is just getting down to explaining it in a concise yet informative manner to a wide variety of audiences. Nathalya Cubas ( talk) 13:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Davidson College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 16:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps, maybe adding an article or reference from an individual stating that art therapy was very beneficial for them to be able to express their emotions would provide more information to the readers. Evelynvpizarra ( talk) 03:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
A fact from Art and emotion appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 November 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hi all, I'm working on this article as a school assignment, and it is in process now, but should be finished and prettied up by Nov. 20. Any suggestions you have would be welcome! For more info in our class visit our course page Rebeccaworrell ( talk) 14:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Also, in the personal and perhaps unrepresentative opinion of this groupuscule:
Pace, groupuscule ( talk) 11:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey Rebecca,
I really like both the content of the article and how you organized the information into categories. My main reviewing advice would be to go over the actual written work a little bit. When explaining some of the psychological concepts, you use a bunch of terms and ideas that might be difficult for non psych majors to understand, so for the average wikipedia user it might help to get some elaboration. Since you clearly did plenty of research it might also be interesting to elaborate on some of the theories you present: for example, in the five-step part to aesthetic experience it might be interesting to actually include the five parts you mention. There are also just some basic errors like an incomplete sentence or verb with the wrong punctuation here and there that should be easy to correct if you read through it carefully one more time. Other than that the article looks really good. Good work!
Geoff — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoffRodman ( talk • contribs) 18:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey Rebecca,
I like the content of the model and your organization as well as conciseness is impeccable. I agree with Geoff that you need to expand on things a bit. The conciseness is great and at least you got the style down but there are some terms that people that haven't been reading empirical research articles in psychology will be confused on. An example is this sentence under the Cognitive mastery and introduction of discrepancy: "It is at this point any discrepancies between expectations and the work, or the work and understanding arise." Please expand here because I am not really sure what you mean by understanding arise. Spell check, revise and read your article out loud. You will find grammatical mistakes that can be distracting. Also, get rid of the spaces after your periods before your citations.
Otherwise, great job! This article really adds and you have a lot of great research here. It is just getting down to explaining it in a concise yet informative manner to a wide variety of audiences. Nathalya Cubas ( talk) 13:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Davidson College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on 16:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps, maybe adding an article or reference from an individual stating that art therapy was very beneficial for them to be able to express their emotions would provide more information to the readers. Evelynvpizarra ( talk) 03:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)