This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Antipsychotic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Overprescription of antipsychotics is evident [1] [2] [3] [4] in spite of side effects, often ignoring existing guidelines.
References
There is at least one deliberatly mangled sentence in the section "schizophrenia" Quote "There is mixed evidence to support a significant impact of antipsychotic use on negative symptoms (such as apathy, lack of emotional affect, and lack of interest in social interactions) or on the cognitive symptoms (memory impairments, reduced ability to plan and execute tasks).[20][21]" Problem:Conditions posed as symptoms (see /info/en/?search=Sluggish_schizophrenia#Conditions_posed_as_symptoms ) If someone were so kind to rewrite it to properly reflect the statement it tries to make, rather than have it say the opposite or something inbetween.. DrBoller ( talk) I think the keyword here is reasons for "non compliance" DrBoller ( talk)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hkhan11 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Eresha8, Birmaniahern, Denisej 2.
— Assignment last updated by Denisej 2 ( talk) 02:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Under Adverse Effects: "Some atypicals are associated with considerable weight gain, diabetes and the risk of metabolic syndrome." this sentence is used twice. EDIT: This sentence is also used twice: "A rare but potentially lethal condition of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) has been associated with the use of antipsychotics." Shoesoft93 ( talk) 17:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
"Through the ability of most antipsychotics to antagonize 5ht2a serotonin pathways enabling a sensitisation of postsynaptic serotonin receptors, mdma exposure can be more intense because it has more excitatory receptors to activate. The same effect can be observed with the d2 antagonizing with normal amphetamine." <- Can I post this sentence? Is it grammatically and orthographically correct? Is the Logic in this sentence good enough for wikipedia?
Thank you for your answers😊 Materie34 ( talk) 03:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia tries to apply as little logic or reasoning as possible to editors (see e.g. WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, particularly synth) instead we try to slavishly follow the literature. Of course, things aren't quite so simple, but my normal practice as soon as I have an idea that might be relevant in wikipedia is try to find a paper discussing the idea and then trying to work out how well accepted this is. This can involve a lot of reading for us, but for the reader has the plus side of connecting them to the literature to review everything about the idea and allows learning for the editor. It can be quite fun to work through a topic guessing might be true and then confirming it in the literature (particularly if the idea is a little subversive and hidden in the mainstream literature).combine the fact
References
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Antipsychotic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Overprescription of antipsychotics is evident [1] [2] [3] [4] in spite of side effects, often ignoring existing guidelines.
References
There is at least one deliberatly mangled sentence in the section "schizophrenia" Quote "There is mixed evidence to support a significant impact of antipsychotic use on negative symptoms (such as apathy, lack of emotional affect, and lack of interest in social interactions) or on the cognitive symptoms (memory impairments, reduced ability to plan and execute tasks).[20][21]" Problem:Conditions posed as symptoms (see /info/en/?search=Sluggish_schizophrenia#Conditions_posed_as_symptoms ) If someone were so kind to rewrite it to properly reflect the statement it tries to make, rather than have it say the opposite or something inbetween.. DrBoller ( talk) I think the keyword here is reasons for "non compliance" DrBoller ( talk)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hkhan11 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Eresha8, Birmaniahern, Denisej 2.
— Assignment last updated by Denisej 2 ( talk) 02:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Under Adverse Effects: "Some atypicals are associated with considerable weight gain, diabetes and the risk of metabolic syndrome." this sentence is used twice. EDIT: This sentence is also used twice: "A rare but potentially lethal condition of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) has been associated with the use of antipsychotics." Shoesoft93 ( talk) 17:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
"Through the ability of most antipsychotics to antagonize 5ht2a serotonin pathways enabling a sensitisation of postsynaptic serotonin receptors, mdma exposure can be more intense because it has more excitatory receptors to activate. The same effect can be observed with the d2 antagonizing with normal amphetamine." <- Can I post this sentence? Is it grammatically and orthographically correct? Is the Logic in this sentence good enough for wikipedia?
Thank you for your answers😊 Materie34 ( talk) 03:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia tries to apply as little logic or reasoning as possible to editors (see e.g. WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, particularly synth) instead we try to slavishly follow the literature. Of course, things aren't quite so simple, but my normal practice as soon as I have an idea that might be relevant in wikipedia is try to find a paper discussing the idea and then trying to work out how well accepted this is. This can involve a lot of reading for us, but for the reader has the plus side of connecting them to the literature to review everything about the idea and allows learning for the editor. It can be quite fun to work through a topic guessing might be true and then confirming it in the literature (particularly if the idea is a little subversive and hidden in the mainstream literature).combine the fact
References