 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anisakis.
|
Don't worms in other genera (marine-mammal ascarids like Phocanema, Terranova, and Pseudoterranova) also cause the disease? Should the page be moved to Anasakiasis and include them? Dave (talk) 18:57, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Technically, yes. I included it here as the other forms of infection are rarer and the articles on the species didn't exist, but if you think it should break out into its own article, that's good with me. Anilocra 19:38, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
Whatever you think is best. Dave (talk) 19:57, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
So I fixed the broken citation for #1, but I screwed up the numbering. Someone else with more knowledge on these tags help me out here? Thanks -- 24.82.242.132 ( talk) 19:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
In the section about Anisakiasis, it mentions areas of high prevalence including Holland, but then states that Holland has mostly eliminated it by requiring freezing of all herring... Does anybody know which is correct? Theuglyman ( talk) 20:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anisakis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928081429/http://www.daveproject.org/ViewFilms.cfm?film_id=220 to http://www.daveproject.org/ViewFilms.cfm?film_id=220
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
The disease entry should have enough notability to be its own article. A split is also necessitated by the fact that very similar diseases, often also considered "Anasakiasis", are caused by other worms under the same family of Anisakidae -- a folks have mentioned it back in 2005, see above.
I don't know whether the severe allergic reaction should also go to the split. I am leaning yes (mechanistically speaking, it probably also isn't limited to this genus), but that won't be quite covered under the title of "Anasakiasis". Artoria 2e5 🌉 12:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anisakis.
|
Don't worms in other genera (marine-mammal ascarids like Phocanema, Terranova, and Pseudoterranova) also cause the disease? Should the page be moved to Anasakiasis and include them? Dave (talk) 18:57, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Technically, yes. I included it here as the other forms of infection are rarer and the articles on the species didn't exist, but if you think it should break out into its own article, that's good with me. Anilocra 19:38, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
Whatever you think is best. Dave (talk) 19:57, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
So I fixed the broken citation for #1, but I screwed up the numbering. Someone else with more knowledge on these tags help me out here? Thanks -- 24.82.242.132 ( talk) 19:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
In the section about Anisakiasis, it mentions areas of high prevalence including Holland, but then states that Holland has mostly eliminated it by requiring freezing of all herring... Does anybody know which is correct? Theuglyman ( talk) 20:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anisakis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928081429/http://www.daveproject.org/ViewFilms.cfm?film_id=220 to http://www.daveproject.org/ViewFilms.cfm?film_id=220
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
The disease entry should have enough notability to be its own article. A split is also necessitated by the fact that very similar diseases, often also considered "Anasakiasis", are caused by other worms under the same family of Anisakidae -- a folks have mentioned it back in 2005, see above.
I don't know whether the severe allergic reaction should also go to the split. I am leaning yes (mechanistically speaking, it probably also isn't limited to this genus), but that won't be quite covered under the title of "Anasakiasis". Artoria 2e5 🌉 12:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)