This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Philosophy: Philosophers / Modern Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Modern philosophy Psychology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have posted a bibliography of Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 19:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

-Added a spouse (w/citation)

-Removed dead-link (Charles Fere)
-Added translation
-Added influences, and influenced

Will add more.

bill 06:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill.D Nguyen ( talk • contribs)

I removed this:

"During his seven years there, any and every of Charcot's views were accepted unconditionally by Binet. This of course, was where he could have used the interactions with others and training in critical thinking that a University education provided."

Perhaps this is true, but without any source it appears to be unsubtantiated speculation / editorializing on the part of whomever added it. Please feel free to restore with a source documenting Binet's "unconditional acceptance" of "any and every" of Charcot's views, and perhaps an attribution to someone of the belief that "training in critical thinking" would "of course" have changed this. Zefryl ( talk) 19:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

One of the sources used in this article was cited very imcompletely, but I think I figured out what book was meant, and I am requesting that book by interlibrary loan. Much of the sourcing of this article needs a lot of work. Feel free to use the source list I have put in Wikipedia user space to check this and other articles. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 22:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC) reply

"It follows that we should question why Binet did not speak out concerning the newfound uses of his measure." editorial? TheNuszAbides ( talk) 07:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Damned right it’s editorial, and imposing values from a later era. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:35A5:CED2:594F:117A ( talk) 01:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alfred Binet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823091541/http://www.psychology.sbc.edu/Alfred%20Binet.htm to http://www.psychology.sbc.edu/Alfred%20Binet.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC) reply

A large section of Later career and the Binet–Simon test is copy-pasted from a blog.

This is the blog: http://profed102.blogspot.com/p/alfred-binet.html

I noticed that some of the citations at the end of sentences looked weird (i.e "...compare children's mental abilities relative to those of their normal peers (Siegler, 1992).") and I reversed-searched the text to find the source.

Plagiarism starts at "In 1904 a French professional group for child psychology, La Société Libre pour l'Et..." and ends at "...the concept of intelligence as a single, unitary construct (White, 2000).",

Neuralnewt ( talk) 22:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC) reply

... written by a C student and handed in late. BTW, is this the way some institutions grant course credit? For creating/editing Wikipedia articles? God between us and all harm.

Please fix. Too many examples to cite, of infelicitous expressions and colloquialisms. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:35A5:CED2:594F:117A ( talk) 01:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply