| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Against Therapy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
This article could be improved by drawing more extensively from the references provided to give a fuller picture of Masson's background in literary studies and his history of invective against psychotherapy in general and Freud and his disciples in specific. Also of use would be clarification about the enormous rift that now exists between the thought of Freud in the early 20th century and actual contemporary psychotherapeutic (and even psychoanalytic) practice, which, while influenced by Freud's digging into the past of patients to provide clues to the resolution of present conflicts, is far from adherence to Freud's original psychoanalytic method, the method Masson inveighs against. -- Kevinhilke ( talk) 20:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This article could be improved by deleting biased sources funded by Psychiary and the pharmaceutical industry. Namely, The New York Times and Time Magazine. And just what is a more slash and burn argument than this very Wikipedia article? Does the NY TImes and Time tell us why it's a waste of time? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
216.183.185.133 (
talk) 22:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NPOV. We don't remove sources simply because editors dislike them or disagree with what they say. Polisher of Cobwebs ( talk) 22:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Against Therapy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
This article could be improved by drawing more extensively from the references provided to give a fuller picture of Masson's background in literary studies and his history of invective against psychotherapy in general and Freud and his disciples in specific. Also of use would be clarification about the enormous rift that now exists between the thought of Freud in the early 20th century and actual contemporary psychotherapeutic (and even psychoanalytic) practice, which, while influenced by Freud's digging into the past of patients to provide clues to the resolution of present conflicts, is far from adherence to Freud's original psychoanalytic method, the method Masson inveighs against. -- Kevinhilke ( talk) 20:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This article could be improved by deleting biased sources funded by Psychiary and the pharmaceutical industry. Namely, The New York Times and Time Magazine. And just what is a more slash and burn argument than this very Wikipedia article? Does the NY TImes and Time tell us why it's a waste of time? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
216.183.185.133 (
talk) 22:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NPOV. We don't remove sources simply because editors dislike them or disagree with what they say. Polisher of Cobwebs ( talk) 22:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)