This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Jewish history#Ancient Jewish history|Judaism]] Anchor Jewish history#Ancient Jewish history links to a specific web page: Chronology of the Bible. [[Cundill Prize#2010|Cundill Prize]] The anchor (#2010) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

@ FreeKnowledgeCreator: I'm wondering why I was reverted, given WP:NAMB and the fact that MacCulloch is described as English in his biography. 142.161.81.20 ( talk) 08:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

I hadn't seen his biography. The fact that he is described as English there, rather than British, is simply strange to me and I wouldn't put any weight on it. As a matter of fact, he was described as British until very recently, for instance in this version of the article, and I am going to undo the change from "British" to "English", as there seems no proper justification for it. Feel free to restore the edit covered by WP:NAMB. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 08:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply