7/27 has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 13, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
7/27 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The writers and producers information for the Title "That's My Girl" is completely wrong and violating the rights of the real writers and producers. I kindly ask for an ASAP exchange to the real writers and producers:
Written by: Lukas Loules, Alexander Kronlund, Tinashe Kaschingwe
Producer: LULOU and Alexander Kronlund
source: http://genius.com/Fifth-harmony-thats-my-girl-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.243.183 ( talk) 17:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The Writers and Producers information is wrong : Right information is:
Written by Lukas Loules , Alexander Kronlund , Tinashe kaschingwe Produced by LULOU
http://genius.com/Fifth-harmony-the-life-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.243.183 ( talk) 19:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under singles, it should say "All In My Head (Flex)" will impact rhythmic radio on May 31, 2016. [1]. The source needs to be archived though.
99.57.170.190 ( talk) 03:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Jack Antonoff should be listed as the producer for "Dope" not Tommy Brown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.48.22.109 ( talk) 00:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The deluxe cover should be the featured cover in the infobox, given its more recognizable recognition, per WP:NFCC. The same happened at MDNA (album), given that the deluxe edition is the more recognized conceptual artwork, in comparison to the standard, which was unveiled within days of its release. livelikemusic talk! 23:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Maskati16 ( talk) 01:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The Life was featured on the third season of the TV Show Younger.
Dear @ LikeGaga:: A wall of text listing glowing reviews is not encyclopedic in nature, but promotional. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a review site. Hence I reverted (and will soon revert again) Phrases like "light reggae guitar plucks, "glowing synths" crashing with the "industrialized percussion." "Squeeze" is "a breezy, generic foot-stomper". "Put your arms around me, baby," the girls coo over starlight synths and a rousing kickbeat, "Only you know how to save me." "Gonna Get Better" features a "romantic acoustic guitar" with a similar vibe of "Write On Me". "Scare of Happy" is a "vibrant house-pop fizz". are nothing short of that and hence not acceptable. Kleuske ( talk) 21:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
User:LikeGaga ( talk) 21:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Fifth Harmony - Write On Me.flac is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Done
Done
Done
@ Lee Vilenski: I'm not sure if UrbanJE is on wiki anymore. Do you mind if I adress the issues you raised? MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
7/27 has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 13, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
7/27 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The writers and producers information for the Title "That's My Girl" is completely wrong and violating the rights of the real writers and producers. I kindly ask for an ASAP exchange to the real writers and producers:
Written by: Lukas Loules, Alexander Kronlund, Tinashe Kaschingwe
Producer: LULOU and Alexander Kronlund
source: http://genius.com/Fifth-harmony-thats-my-girl-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.243.183 ( talk) 17:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The Writers and Producers information is wrong : Right information is:
Written by Lukas Loules , Alexander Kronlund , Tinashe kaschingwe Produced by LULOU
http://genius.com/Fifth-harmony-the-life-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.243.183 ( talk) 19:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under singles, it should say "All In My Head (Flex)" will impact rhythmic radio on May 31, 2016. [1]. The source needs to be archived though.
99.57.170.190 ( talk) 03:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Jack Antonoff should be listed as the producer for "Dope" not Tommy Brown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.48.22.109 ( talk) 00:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The deluxe cover should be the featured cover in the infobox, given its more recognizable recognition, per WP:NFCC. The same happened at MDNA (album), given that the deluxe edition is the more recognized conceptual artwork, in comparison to the standard, which was unveiled within days of its release. livelikemusic talk! 23:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Maskati16 ( talk) 01:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The Life was featured on the third season of the TV Show Younger.
Dear @ LikeGaga:: A wall of text listing glowing reviews is not encyclopedic in nature, but promotional. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a review site. Hence I reverted (and will soon revert again) Phrases like "light reggae guitar plucks, "glowing synths" crashing with the "industrialized percussion." "Squeeze" is "a breezy, generic foot-stomper". "Put your arms around me, baby," the girls coo over starlight synths and a rousing kickbeat, "Only you know how to save me." "Gonna Get Better" features a "romantic acoustic guitar" with a similar vibe of "Write On Me". "Scare of Happy" is a "vibrant house-pop fizz". are nothing short of that and hence not acceptable. Kleuske ( talk) 21:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
User:LikeGaga ( talk) 21:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Fifth Harmony - Write On Me.flac is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- 10:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Done
Done
Done
@ Lee Vilenski: I'm not sure if UrbanJE is on wiki anymore. Do you mind if I adress the issues you raised? MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)