2010 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 12, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is a historical article, not a daily tally sheet. If someone drops out or loses, do not erase them; rather, refer to them as having run and lost, dropped out, etc. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sestak has indicated his intent to run pending a family decision. He has NOT yet announced his candidacy. Please leave him under "potential" until he does so. -- Tsk070 ( talk) 09:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Anti-Sestak bias much in the Democratic primary section? Anyone watching who's editing this thing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.252.147.168 ( talk) 21:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
References
Why are there two lists of candidates? Worse, they seem to be somewhat different. Can someone please remove the second list and integrate the information into the first list? Also, any candidate should be identified by political party. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
"Pa. Rep. Sestak stands by claim that White House offered him job to drop challenge of Specter" is the headline in the LA Times on February 20, 2010. The Philadelphia Inquirer mentions a White House denial. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Can another editor follow up on this and add it to the article? -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The campaign section is pretty biased towards a favorable view of Specter. Why is there no mention of many of the problems brought up regarding his service as a Republican, his misquotes, his lobbying interests, but it's okay to slam Sestak on HIS record? Coolgamer ( talk) 12:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
This race is now about Sestak and Toomey. However, as the article reads, Specter gets more mention earlier on. Now that the primaries have happened, the Specter business and what lead up to the primaries should be subordinated to the final race. Toomey gets little mention until well into the article. For more balance and objectivity, the final race should be the main focus. 173.49.135.190 ( talk) 19:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#Polling. — Markles 16:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1453{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1452{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1441{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1428{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1406{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1379{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1304/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://edisk.fandm.edu/FLI/keystone/pdf/keymar09_1.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1304/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1379{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1406{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1428{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1442{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/toplines/toplines_2010_pennsylvania_senate_may_19_2010/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1475{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/mc-poll-results-0926,0,4689018.acrobat{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1522{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mcall.com/media/acrobat/2010-10/56932398.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1529{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.pollster.com/polls/pa/10-pa-sen-ge-mvl.phpWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Usernameunique ( talk · contribs) 12:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Lead
Candidates
Campaign
Results
Background
Specter switches parties
Toomey jumps ahead
Final primary months
Results
Early weeks
Ideological opposites
Debates
Predictions
Results
2010 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 12, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is a historical article, not a daily tally sheet. If someone drops out or loses, do not erase them; rather, refer to them as having run and lost, dropped out, etc. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sestak has indicated his intent to run pending a family decision. He has NOT yet announced his candidacy. Please leave him under "potential" until he does so. -- Tsk070 ( talk) 09:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Anti-Sestak bias much in the Democratic primary section? Anyone watching who's editing this thing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.252.147.168 ( talk) 21:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
References
Why are there two lists of candidates? Worse, they seem to be somewhat different. Can someone please remove the second list and integrate the information into the first list? Also, any candidate should be identified by political party. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
"Pa. Rep. Sestak stands by claim that White House offered him job to drop challenge of Specter" is the headline in the LA Times on February 20, 2010. The Philadelphia Inquirer mentions a White House denial. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Can another editor follow up on this and add it to the article? -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 13:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The campaign section is pretty biased towards a favorable view of Specter. Why is there no mention of many of the problems brought up regarding his service as a Republican, his misquotes, his lobbying interests, but it's okay to slam Sestak on HIS record? Coolgamer ( talk) 12:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
This race is now about Sestak and Toomey. However, as the article reads, Specter gets more mention earlier on. Now that the primaries have happened, the Specter business and what lead up to the primaries should be subordinated to the final race. Toomey gets little mention until well into the article. For more balance and objectivity, the final race should be the main focus. 173.49.135.190 ( talk) 19:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#Polling. — Markles 16:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1453{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1452{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1441{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1428{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1406{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1379{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1304/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://edisk.fandm.edu/FLI/keystone/pdf/keymar09_1.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1304/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1379{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1406{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1428{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1442{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/toplines/toplines_2010_pennsylvania_senate_may_19_2010/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1475{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/mc-poll-results-0926,0,4689018.acrobat{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1522{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mcall.com/media/acrobat/2010-10/56932398.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1529{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.pollster.com/polls/pa/10-pa-sen-ge-mvl.phpWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Usernameunique ( talk · contribs) 12:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Lead
Candidates
Campaign
Results
Background
Specter switches parties
Toomey jumps ahead
Final primary months
Results
Early weeks
Ideological opposites
Debates
Predictions
Results