2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 21, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

NASCAR Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Contribute to the project: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See all here Assess : See all here Cleanup : Days of Thunder, Rusty Wallace, NASCAR Thunder 2003, Bill Weber, Wood Brothers Racing, Amber Cope Copyedit : NASCAR, Dale Earnhardt, 2010 Aaron's 499, Mark Martin Expand : Road course ringer, BAM Racing, Greg Erwin, Donnie Wingo, 2008 Daytona 500, 1991 Daytona 500, Ken Schrader Racing, Win-Tron Racing, Venturini Motorsports Maintain : 2024 NASCAR Cup Series, 2024 NASCAR Xfinity Series, 2024 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series, 2024 ARCA Menards Series, 2024 ARCA Menards Series East, 2024 ARCA Menards Series West, , List of female NASCAR drivers NPOV : Criticism of NASCAR, RahMoc Enterprises, Mara Reyes, NAPA Auto Parts 200, NASCAR Kinetics Photo : see all here Stubs : See all here Update : 2025 NASCAR Cup Series, 2025 NASCAR Xfinity Series, 2025 NASCAR Camping World Truck Series, 2025 ARCA Menards Series Verify : NASCAR rules and regulations, 2008 Dickies 500, Frank Cicci Racing, Scott Lagasse Jr. Other : More United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Bushranger ( talk · contribs) 19:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Overall nice work here. Just has a few quibbles that need working on.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Nice work here. Do have a few quibbles, however. To wit:

• "The standard track at Phoenix International Raceway is a four-turn short track oval that is 1 mile (1.6 km) long." - No mention of the dogleg?
  • How does "The back stretch, which has a dogleg shape instead of a straight..." work? -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "The back stretch had a 9 degree banking." - might be better as "has 9 degrees of..."
  •  Done -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "was eleventh and twelfth" - "were", not "was"
  •  Done -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "Edwards retained the pole position lead" - slightly awkward, perhaps "retained the lead from the pole position"?
  •  Done -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "collided into the wall" - appears several times but is also slightly awkward, would "...hit the wall in turn (#)" work?
  • Since it doesn't specify which turn it occurred in, I just substituted "collided" with other words in the other instances. -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "reclaimed the lead away from Hamlin" - shoud be either "took the lead away from..." or "reclaimed the lead from..." I think.
  •  Done -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• "caused him to fall to nineteenth on the grid" - sounds like the starting grid is being referenced. "...nineteenth in the field"?
  •  Done Removed "on the grid." -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• In the results tables, "Stewart-Haas Racing" should have the dash.
  •  Done -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   Article is fully and factually referenced, with citations throughout and free of WP:OR. I do have a quibble with the citation style used though, as it may be unclear to some viewers. I'd suggest using the following for certain sites, with the format work=/publisher=: Rotoworld.com = Rotoworld/NBC Sports; NASCAR.Com = NASCAR.com/Turner Sports; Jayski.com = Jayski's Silly Season Site/ESPN; racing-reference.info = Racing=Reference/USA Today Sports Media Group; MotorRacingNetwork.com = Motor Racing Network/International Speedway Corporation. Also, I'm not sure Auto Racing Daily is universally recognised as a reliable source, would it be possible to perhaps cite a newspaper report instead, like The Charlotte Observer's?

    Done... I had to change the quotes while I was at it... -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 20:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Article covers the event well and broadly without needless digression.

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article is neutral.

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are appropriate, appropriately licensed, and captioned.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very close, just needs attention to the issues above; placed on hold until then. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

   Looks like I have fixed all of the problems you have expressed. -- Nascar1996^{( Talk • Contribs)} 20:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

   And pass, good work! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111025735/http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/ to http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply