From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2007 Indianapolis Colts season was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2008 Good article nomineeNot listed

Week 9 controversy?

Would this be the appropriate place to add the Patriots accusation that the Colts piped in audio during the game? Ryratt 07:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC) reply

And the NFL and CBS's subsequent denial of such ludicrous claims? Brainscar ( talk) 11:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Simeon Rice

There should be some mention of Simeon Rice's short stint with the Colts. He was claimed off of waivers from the Broncos, played two games, and was released, (at which point FB Luke Lawton was re-signed). It should go somewhere, but not sure where. Brainscar ( talk) 11:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Failed GA review

A good example of a football article to model after is 2005 Texas Longhorn football team.

1. Prose- Fail. Includes Wikipedia:Words to avoid, lead section needs to include more detail (like some talk of previous season) and information abut season events. There are simply too many lists which might be more graphically exciting if integrated into article. See Wikipedia:Embedded list for ideas. What lists are included or not included is often debated, by these are some potential ways to improve. Wikipedia:Words to avoid need to be removed.

2. Verifiable- Fail. Many areas lack sources all together.

3. Coverage- Fail- The coverage concerning individual games does not integrate lists. There is no preseason section. Usually, there is some sort of pre game or post game commentary by coaches or players. The article might be helped by integrating some commentary or pre game decision making into the game summaries.

4. Neutral- Fail. The article reads pro Colts. The article needs to address NPOV#Let_the_facts_speak_for_themselves and words to avoid to remove bias.

5. Stable- Check

6. Images- Fail. The article has only one small image concerning the Thanksgiving game. There are quite a few pictures at flickr. Upload Attribution and Attribution Share-Alike photos to Wikimedia Commons. There are some other photos you can use at the Commons.

I hope this review is not discouraging, but provides for useful feedback to improve this article. Only a very few article on wikipedia meet good article or featured article status. You are always welcome to message my talk page with questions. Good luck! User:calbear22 ( talk) 18:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with File:Thanksgiving2006logo.png

The image File:Thanksgiving2006logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 5

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 6

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 7

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 8

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 9

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 10

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 11

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 12

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 13

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 14

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 15

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 16

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 17

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

 Fixed This link is now marked as dead and using an archived copy. — DeeJayK ( talk) 21:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 18

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Playoff Schedule

This is Anonymous0697. The Colts playoff game against the Chargers was at the RCA Dome not Lucas Oil Stadium. You made a mistake. Lucas Oil Stadium was not open yet Anonymous0697 ( talk) 17:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Playoff schedule

Also you forgot to point out the playoff loss against the Chargers was the last game in the RCA Dome Anonymous0697 ( talk) 17:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Playoff schedule

The correct fact I got from this site


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/

Anonymous0697 ( talk) 02:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2007 Indianapolis Colts season was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2008 Good article nomineeNot listed

Week 9 controversy?

Would this be the appropriate place to add the Patriots accusation that the Colts piped in audio during the game? Ryratt 07:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC) reply

And the NFL and CBS's subsequent denial of such ludicrous claims? Brainscar ( talk) 11:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Simeon Rice

There should be some mention of Simeon Rice's short stint with the Colts. He was claimed off of waivers from the Broncos, played two games, and was released, (at which point FB Luke Lawton was re-signed). It should go somewhere, but not sure where. Brainscar ( talk) 11:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Failed GA review

A good example of a football article to model after is 2005 Texas Longhorn football team.

1. Prose- Fail. Includes Wikipedia:Words to avoid, lead section needs to include more detail (like some talk of previous season) and information abut season events. There are simply too many lists which might be more graphically exciting if integrated into article. See Wikipedia:Embedded list for ideas. What lists are included or not included is often debated, by these are some potential ways to improve. Wikipedia:Words to avoid need to be removed.

2. Verifiable- Fail. Many areas lack sources all together.

3. Coverage- Fail- The coverage concerning individual games does not integrate lists. There is no preseason section. Usually, there is some sort of pre game or post game commentary by coaches or players. The article might be helped by integrating some commentary or pre game decision making into the game summaries.

4. Neutral- Fail. The article reads pro Colts. The article needs to address NPOV#Let_the_facts_speak_for_themselves and words to avoid to remove bias.

5. Stable- Check

6. Images- Fail. The article has only one small image concerning the Thanksgiving game. There are quite a few pictures at flickr. Upload Attribution and Attribution Share-Alike photos to Wikimedia Commons. There are some other photos you can use at the Commons.

I hope this review is not discouraging, but provides for useful feedback to improve this article. Only a very few article on wikipedia meet good article or featured article status. You are always welcome to message my talk page with questions. Good luck! User:calbear22 ( talk) 18:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with File:Thanksgiving2006logo.png

The image File:Thanksgiving2006logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 5

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 6

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 7

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 8

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 9

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 10

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 11

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 12

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 13

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 14

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 15

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 16

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 17

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

 Fixed This link is now marked as dead and using an archived copy. — DeeJayK ( talk) 21:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Dead link 18

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 14:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Playoff Schedule

This is Anonymous0697. The Colts playoff game against the Chargers was at the RCA Dome not Lucas Oil Stadium. You made a mistake. Lucas Oil Stadium was not open yet Anonymous0697 ( talk) 17:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Playoff schedule

Also you forgot to point out the playoff loss against the Chargers was the last game in the RCA Dome Anonymous0697 ( talk) 17:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Playoff schedule

The correct fact I got from this site


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/

Anonymous0697 ( talk) 02:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook