2003 London Champ Car Trophy has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 11, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2003 London Champ Car Trophy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 12:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- CopyVio brings up the large quote in the prose. I'll comment on this later. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
because he had conversed fuel? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Two 50-minute practice sessions were held on the Saturday before the race. A third 75-minute session took place on the Sunday morning prior to qualifying.- So what does this mean? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
2003 London Champ Car Trophy has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 11, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2003 London Champ Car Trophy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 12:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It contains copyright infringements- CopyVio brings up the large quote in the prose. I'll comment on this later. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
because he had conversed fuel? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 13:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Two 50-minute practice sessions were held on the Saturday before the race. A third 75-minute session took place on the Sunday morning prior to qualifying.- So what does this mean? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)