2001 Masters (snooker) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 3, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2001 Masters (snooker) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
cuetracker has Williams scoring a century in this match, 102 in frame 4. This is incorrect. The Sun for 8 February has an article "Fergal marks up win at last - Snooker" in which it says "... But O'Brien buried those bitter memories as he fired in breaks of 102, 99 and 88 on his way to a nail-biting 6-5 victory. O'Brien, who clinched victory with a 53 break in the decider ..." The Mirror says "He repeatedly outscored Williams including a century in frame three and 99 in the penultimate frame" The Times also refers to a 53 break in the final frame by O'Brien. Indeed it's clear there's a problem with cuetracker since the frame-by-frame score has O'Brien 6-3 up and then Williams winning the last 2 frames, which makes no sense. Embarrassingly it did said O'Brien until I changed it in 2015. Nigej ( talk) 12:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Happy to discuss or be challenged on any of my review comments. Regards,
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk) 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio check: Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows 39.4%. I reviewed all matches over 4% and found no concerns - the matches are appropriately sourced direct quotes or very common phrases.
Images - no images used. Looks like there are no freely available images of the winner or of the event. Passed for images.
Infobox:
Lead: - looks fine.
Overview:
Tournament Summary
Main Draw - looks fine.
Qualifying
Century breaks
Passing this now, as I'm happy it meets GA standards. Great work, MWright96. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 23:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
2001 Masters (snooker) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 3, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2001 Masters (snooker) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
cuetracker has Williams scoring a century in this match, 102 in frame 4. This is incorrect. The Sun for 8 February has an article "Fergal marks up win at last - Snooker" in which it says "... But O'Brien buried those bitter memories as he fired in breaks of 102, 99 and 88 on his way to a nail-biting 6-5 victory. O'Brien, who clinched victory with a 53 break in the decider ..." The Mirror says "He repeatedly outscored Williams including a century in frame three and 99 in the penultimate frame" The Times also refers to a 53 break in the final frame by O'Brien. Indeed it's clear there's a problem with cuetracker since the frame-by-frame score has O'Brien 6-3 up and then Williams winning the last 2 frames, which makes no sense. Embarrassingly it did said O'Brien until I changed it in 2015. Nigej ( talk) 12:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose ( talk · contribs) 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Happy to discuss or be challenged on any of my review comments. Regards,
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk) 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio check: Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows 39.4%. I reviewed all matches over 4% and found no concerns - the matches are appropriately sourced direct quotes or very common phrases.
Images - no images used. Looks like there are no freely available images of the winner or of the event. Passed for images.
Infobox:
Lead: - looks fine.
Overview:
Tournament Summary
Main Draw - looks fine.
Qualifying
Century breaks
Passing this now, as I'm happy it meets GA standards. Great work, MWright96. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 23:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)