1: Nenokkadine has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 24, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
plz let me edit their is wrong information provided 115.240.120.224 ( talk) 16:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
49.205.61.82 ( talk) 11:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC) [1]
References
1st day collections in AP were reported to be around 11.4cr (share).2nd day collections were around 10cr ap share.3rd day around 9 cr AP(share). Total first weekend ap share was around 30cr Vishwanath3939 ( talk) 11:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
@
TheRedPenOfDoom: With reference to
this revert, your edit summary tells "not a reliable source". The contents in the section cites
http://www.123telugu.com. Either the issue could be brought to talk page or the creator/major contributor (@
Raghusri) of the article or if this isn't a reliable source, it may be discussed at
WP:RSN. Else {{
Refimprove section}}
could have been added to that section. Thank you --
βα£α(
ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 04:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
We only include reviews from professional review sites, and we do not even need to include every "professional" review that we may find. The bloat with non professional reviews needs to be and stay trimmed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
I'll have this done today or tomorrow
JAG
UAR 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Is this a one I should watch? I remember watching the trailer and I can understand why some of the reviews are negative. The article is great, it is well written, well sourced and I couldn't find one issue with any of the sources. Once all of the minor points above are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this! JAG UAR 21:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
The bulk of the data in the box office section seems to revolve around distributor share, not gross. Why is that? Am I misinterpreting what "share" means? MOS:FILM focuses on gross and budget, not financial details about distributor shares. Any info would be appreciated before I start trimming. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Ab207 and Cyphoidbomb: Looking back at the film [1], I notice that Gautham's name is presented before Kriti Sanon at the beginning credits so shouldn't his name be in front of hers in the article. SP013 ( talk) 15:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
1: Nenokkadine has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 24, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
plz let me edit their is wrong information provided 115.240.120.224 ( talk) 16:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
49.205.61.82 ( talk) 11:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC) [1]
References
1st day collections in AP were reported to be around 11.4cr (share).2nd day collections were around 10cr ap share.3rd day around 9 cr AP(share). Total first weekend ap share was around 30cr Vishwanath3939 ( talk) 11:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
@
TheRedPenOfDoom: With reference to
this revert, your edit summary tells "not a reliable source". The contents in the section cites
http://www.123telugu.com. Either the issue could be brought to talk page or the creator/major contributor (@
Raghusri) of the article or if this isn't a reliable source, it may be discussed at
WP:RSN. Else {{
Refimprove section}}
could have been added to that section. Thank you --
βα£α(
ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 04:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
We only include reviews from professional review sites, and we do not even need to include every "professional" review that we may find. The bloat with non professional reviews needs to be and stay trimmed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
I'll have this done today or tomorrow
JAG
UAR 14:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Is this a one I should watch? I remember watching the trailer and I can understand why some of the reviews are negative. The article is great, it is well written, well sourced and I couldn't find one issue with any of the sources. Once all of the minor points above are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this! JAG UAR 21:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
The bulk of the data in the box office section seems to revolve around distributor share, not gross. Why is that? Am I misinterpreting what "share" means? MOS:FILM focuses on gross and budget, not financial details about distributor shares. Any info would be appreciated before I start trimming. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Ab207 and Cyphoidbomb: Looking back at the film [1], I notice that Gautham's name is presented before Kriti Sanon at the beginning credits so shouldn't his name be in front of hers in the article. SP013 ( talk) 15:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)