This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bosnia and Herzegovina High‑importance 1992 Bosnian independence referendum is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Yugoslavia Mid‑importance 1992 Bosnian independence referendum is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 12 June 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosnian independence referendum, 1992. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529223410/http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf to http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosnian independence referendum, 1992. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522132353/http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=UserGroups.Home&ContentRecord_id=250&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=5&Subaction=ByDate to http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=UserGroups.Home&ContentRecord_id=250&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=5&Subaction=ByDate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

We have the core Wiki standard of NPOV and it is completely ignored in this and many other articles on the topic of Yugoslav wars. There is a constant talk of agression, which is blunt one-sided presentation of the topic. Mm.srb ( talk) 13:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I did not find a single mention of aggression in this article. Could you please be more specific? Surtsicna ( talk) 14:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC) reply

That is because I only recently deleted it, which gave me reason enough to suspect the breaking of NPOV. Same goes for the page Bosnia and Herzegovina, with Serbs and Croats credited as "Serbs" and "Croats" in the history section. Mm.srb ( talk)

What you recently deleted was a direct quote from the source. I do not see how it fails NPOV. If you ask me, attacking someone is rather aggressive. Surtsicna ( talk) 15:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Reverse logic; there are tens of sources saying that Skenderbeg is of Serbian origin, but they are not quoted on Wikipedia. Wonder why? Using one source on a sensitive matter (plus, that pseudo-characterization is aiming at a bigger game) and quoting it in the text as a fact, without apostrophizing that it is, in fact, the opinion or of the author, is a direct misuse of Wikipedia, because one author's opinion or assessment is used to verify daily political rhetorics and to illustrate the standpoint of one side on the terrible events from recent history. There is no NPOV in that. Mm.srb ( talk) 16:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC) reply