1979 Coyote Lake earthquake has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 31, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: West Virginian ( talk · contribs) 16:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dawnseeker2000, I will engage in a comprehensive and thorough review of this article within the next 48 hours, especially so I can continue to put to use all the earthquake and tectonics terminology and theories that I've learned from your previous earthquake articles. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments for me in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dawnseeker2000, following my thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article, I assess that it exceeds the outlined criteria for Good Article status. Prior to the article's passage, however, I have a few comments and suggestions that should be addressed first. Thank you for all your phenomenal work on this article. -- West Virginian (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Lede
I've changed the infobox as well.
Agreed, this is another good tip. Keep them coming!
Tectonic setting
Earthquake
Thanks for spotting the overlinking.
The source does mention the distance felt, so I've included it.
Changed one instance to "was located".
Response
Good morning/afternoon, West Virginian. I've responded to the suggestions by making the minor changes to the article. Can you look it over once again? Dawnseeker2000 16:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
1979 Coyote Lake earthquake has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 31, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: West Virginian ( talk · contribs) 16:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dawnseeker2000, I will engage in a comprehensive and thorough review of this article within the next 48 hours, especially so I can continue to put to use all the earthquake and tectonics terminology and theories that I've learned from your previous earthquake articles. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments for me in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dawnseeker2000, following my thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article, I assess that it exceeds the outlined criteria for Good Article status. Prior to the article's passage, however, I have a few comments and suggestions that should be addressed first. Thank you for all your phenomenal work on this article. -- West Virginian (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Lede
I've changed the infobox as well.
Agreed, this is another good tip. Keep them coming!
Tectonic setting
Earthquake
Thanks for spotting the overlinking.
The source does mention the distance felt, so I've included it.
Changed one instance to "was located".
Response
Good morning/afternoon, West Virginian. I've responded to the suggestions by making the minor changes to the article. Can you look it over once again? Dawnseeker2000 16:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)