From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 25, 2024 Good article nomineeListed
April 20, 2024 Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on August 12, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after Harvard was defeated in the 1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game—one of the greatest upsets in college football history— MIT students celebrated the win by tearing down Harvard's goalposts?
Current status: Featured article

Great subject

I just wanted to add that this game was profiled in the notable ESPN documentary on college football (from the early 2000s) "Rites of Autumn". -- Bobak ( talk) 15:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 09:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll have a go at this one. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments

A thoroughly entertaining piece of sporting history, and a well-written and well-cited article with apposite illustrations, so my comments will be few.

  • I suppose that the variety of football (clearly not soccer) should be mentioned and linked somewhere.
    • I piped "college football" in the first sentence to "collegiate American football", still linking to college football. My other idea was to have it as " collegiate American football" though I have some SEAOFBLUE concerns about that. More than happy to hear suggestions about how to better convey/display that. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Maybe wikilink chemical formula.
  • Governor Edwin P. Morrow: maybe say Kentucky governor since the state hasn't been mentioned yet: or maybe better, say Danville, Kentucky just above.
  • At top of 'Recent years', maybe drop first word "After" and end sentence at "World War I", starting next sentence with "The team...". The next paragraph begins with "After", for one thing.
  • "after the contest sold out[16]" -> "when the contest sold out,[16]"
  • "a former Transylvania football player": this isn't the country, so maybe say "Transylvania University" or "Transylvania Pioneers" explicitly.
    • Good point, changed to Transylvania University with a link to the school since I realized I duplicated a link to the football program's page as there is one farther up. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • "had not ever played" -> "had never played"
  • 'Game summary' - I guess I can see why the heading was phrased this way but it's rather a dull one. Maybe 'Game play' or something on those lines? I'd be tempted to write 'The game itself' but people don't like the definite article.
    • "Game summary" is sort of my default as it's used very commonly in present-day college football articles; my second choice would probably be something like "The game" but that doesn't get rid of the definite article issue you mentioned. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • "impossible formula" image: suggest we say in the caption, and repeat the citation there, that the formula was painted all around Danville from soon after the game.
  • 'See also': why not move the link to the text "largest upsets in the history of college football"? Or it could be a "Further" link at the top of 'Legacy'.
    • It wouldn't fit for the "largest upsets" text since that list covers more than just historical upsets. I added it as a hatnote in "Legacy" with "See also" instead of "Further", since in my mind the latter gives the impression that there will be more reading about this game's legacy specifically instead of other games with notable legacies - also open to further suggestion here if you feel there is a better solution. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Images

  • All images are from Commons; all are clearly PD as labelled there, except for the recent photograph by nom which is CC-by-SA.
  • (I note in passing that [49] Danville Daily Messenger's front page would work really nicely as a thumbnail image in the article. Given its date, it must be PD. Obviously not a requirement for GA.)
    • Uploaded this and stuck it in "Immediate impact and reactions" for now, moving the C6H0 photo down to "Legacy", though these locations might change. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Sources

  • All spotchecks passed with flying colours.

Summary

This is a fine article and with the few small adjustments will make a worthy GA. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst  talk 04:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The "impossible formula" painted on a building
The "impossible formula" painted on a building

Improved to Good Article status by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work! Everything appears good. QPQ done. Image works. Although it did appear at DYK 16 years ago, I think you're right in that it is eligible to appear again. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 25, 2024 Good article nomineeListed
April 20, 2024 Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on August 12, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after Harvard was defeated in the 1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game—one of the greatest upsets in college football history— MIT students celebrated the win by tearing down Harvard's goalposts?
Current status: Featured article

Great subject

I just wanted to add that this game was profiled in the notable ESPN documentary on college football (from the early 2000s) "Rites of Autumn". -- Bobak ( talk) 15:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 09:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll have a go at this one. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments

A thoroughly entertaining piece of sporting history, and a well-written and well-cited article with apposite illustrations, so my comments will be few.

  • I suppose that the variety of football (clearly not soccer) should be mentioned and linked somewhere.
    • I piped "college football" in the first sentence to "collegiate American football", still linking to college football. My other idea was to have it as " collegiate American football" though I have some SEAOFBLUE concerns about that. More than happy to hear suggestions about how to better convey/display that. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Maybe wikilink chemical formula.
  • Governor Edwin P. Morrow: maybe say Kentucky governor since the state hasn't been mentioned yet: or maybe better, say Danville, Kentucky just above.
  • At top of 'Recent years', maybe drop first word "After" and end sentence at "World War I", starting next sentence with "The team...". The next paragraph begins with "After", for one thing.
  • "after the contest sold out[16]" -> "when the contest sold out,[16]"
  • "a former Transylvania football player": this isn't the country, so maybe say "Transylvania University" or "Transylvania Pioneers" explicitly.
    • Good point, changed to Transylvania University with a link to the school since I realized I duplicated a link to the football program's page as there is one farther up. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • "had not ever played" -> "had never played"
  • 'Game summary' - I guess I can see why the heading was phrased this way but it's rather a dull one. Maybe 'Game play' or something on those lines? I'd be tempted to write 'The game itself' but people don't like the definite article.
    • "Game summary" is sort of my default as it's used very commonly in present-day college football articles; my second choice would probably be something like "The game" but that doesn't get rid of the definite article issue you mentioned. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • "impossible formula" image: suggest we say in the caption, and repeat the citation there, that the formula was painted all around Danville from soon after the game.
  • 'See also': why not move the link to the text "largest upsets in the history of college football"? Or it could be a "Further" link at the top of 'Legacy'.
    • It wouldn't fit for the "largest upsets" text since that list covers more than just historical upsets. I added it as a hatnote in "Legacy" with "See also" instead of "Further", since in my mind the latter gives the impression that there will be more reading about this game's legacy specifically instead of other games with notable legacies - also open to further suggestion here if you feel there is a better solution. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Images

  • All images are from Commons; all are clearly PD as labelled there, except for the recent photograph by nom which is CC-by-SA.
  • (I note in passing that [49] Danville Daily Messenger's front page would work really nicely as a thumbnail image in the article. Given its date, it must be PD. Obviously not a requirement for GA.)
    • Uploaded this and stuck it in "Immediate impact and reactions" for now, moving the C6H0 photo down to "Legacy", though these locations might change. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Sources

  • All spotchecks passed with flying colours.

Summary

This is a fine article and with the few small adjustments will make a worthy GA. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst  talk 04:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The "impossible formula" painted on a building
The "impossible formula" painted on a building

Improved to Good Article status by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work! Everything appears good. QPQ done. Image works. Although it did appear at DYK 16 years ago, I think you're right in that it is eligible to appear again. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook