The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus that the ... is not sufficient disambiguation to remove (film), and no consensus to move to any other title right now (though some do suggest removing the ... altogether). ( non-admin closure)  —  Amakuru ( talk) 18:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC) reply

...Re (film) → ...Re – No need for parenthetical disambiguation in title as there are no other Wikipedia articles about subjects called "...Re". – GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 04:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

• @ GeoffreyT2000: The dots are not enough distinction from many other pages listed in disambig page Re, some with dots attached. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 04:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Oppose – in agreement with what Anthony Appleyard says. Better to make it recognizable as a film title. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per NEW INDIAN EXPRESS : 'Re' Revolves Around the 'ifs' of our Lives: Desai In ictu oculi ( talk) 14:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Please read the body of that article... Dohn joe ( talk) 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The point is that it is not consistently called "...", which is why using "..." instead of "(film)" is not helpful. In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

• Oppose – in agreement with what Anthony Appleyard says. Clearer if it is recognizable as a film title. Pincrete ( talk) 14:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Anyone typing in the "..." before "Re" is probably looking for this film. The current title will stay as a redirect, as will Re (film), which I just created. Dohn joe ( talk) 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Oppose, should be located at Re (film) with ...Re as a logical redirect. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.