![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
![]() | On 8 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Zora (razločitev) to Zora. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The general ideas on this page are fine, but the actual writing is horrible. Too much of the text is written in the present tense rather than the past tense, which would be more appropriate for an encyclopedic article such as this.
Too often, the article gets caught up in minor details of the games which are irrelevant, such as blow-by-blow accounts of what a character does in the game that s/he is featured in.
The "Evolution" section, I feel, gives a bit too much creedence to that particular theory, and gives the impression that it is by and large the accepted reality for most fans. It should be rewritten in a way that presents the idea as what it is: a theory.
Robotpoop 20:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Should this be merged with the new The Legend of Zelda series characters page, or do you think the Zoras are important enough to have their own page? I'm undecided. I've already moved the Gorons, but then again they appear in only a few games compared to the Zoras. Master Thief Garrett 22:08, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I think this section is maybe too large. It's filled with mostly speculation. Also, I tried to copyedit it and had to guess a couple times at the meaning of certain sentences. I hope I didn't misinterpret anything. Anyone have opinions on this section? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? If nobody objects (does anybody even watch this page?), and I remember, I'll clean it up.
I'm also on a campaign to eliminate writing in the second person. It makes the article sound like a walkthrough, or at least something severely unprofessional. Among the articles that I edit, writing in the second person seems to be most prominent in video game-related articles. I don't know if this is because the topic lends itself to walkthrough-style writing, or if it's because the author of a video game article is more likely to write informally. Aerion //talk 04:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
I wonder if I should make evolution its own section...
I don't even see why there's any speculation about it. The whole point of the getting Medlii is because she's a decendent of the Zora sage. There's truly no question of evolution - it's pretty plain to see that it happened and it's almost explicitly explained that way in the game. The same goes for the Koroks. They were originally the Kokiri children.--
Cwiddofer
05:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I was under the impression Japas was the band's bassist. Perhaps I'll have to play MM again. - 211.28.142.247 04:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
No, you don't have to play MM again. Japas is the band's bassist.
I have always wondered whether Mikau and Lulu had any sort of relationship, and by that I mean something more than a friendship. I was once told that Lulu's children were Mikau's as well, but the game itself doesn't give any sort of evidence. Any thoughts?
Zaraeph has made some reference to your questioning my credentials. Is there a problem? -- Mjformica 13:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your edit to Sakina bint Hussain - neutrality was significantly improved, good work! T. J. Day 00:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I changed the fanon names "Sea Zora" and "River Zora" into "Friendly Zora" and "Hostile Zora". I copied the Oracle series part into the Friendly Zora bit too, since it also concerns them. I then split the section into two, the part that reffers to the friendly zora, and the part that reffers to the hostile, and moving them accordingly - Saimdusan4:13 PM 7 June 2006
Don't think us noble sea Zoras the same as those savage, vulgar river Zoras! You're in the wrong place if you want to complain about being attacked by a river Zora.
My point was not that if the Mu'tazili position regarding hadith is mentioned then the QA position should follow. Due to the historical impact the Mu'tazilah have had they are much more worthy of mention than the QA. Per wp:undue, the QAers simply do not warrant mention as they numbers are negligible. The Mu'tazili page has a section on their position regarding hadith, although I think it is unreferenced. Supertouch ( talk) 20:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. @ User:GeographieMan: No need for a RM discussion in cases like this. You can ask for quick assistance at WP:RMTR. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 15:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Zora (razločitev) → Zora – Unintentionally moved; please revert everything since I can't. — GeographieMan[ ~MSG~ 14:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
![]() | On 8 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Zora (razločitev) to Zora. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The general ideas on this page are fine, but the actual writing is horrible. Too much of the text is written in the present tense rather than the past tense, which would be more appropriate for an encyclopedic article such as this.
Too often, the article gets caught up in minor details of the games which are irrelevant, such as blow-by-blow accounts of what a character does in the game that s/he is featured in.
The "Evolution" section, I feel, gives a bit too much creedence to that particular theory, and gives the impression that it is by and large the accepted reality for most fans. It should be rewritten in a way that presents the idea as what it is: a theory.
Robotpoop 20:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Should this be merged with the new The Legend of Zelda series characters page, or do you think the Zoras are important enough to have their own page? I'm undecided. I've already moved the Gorons, but then again they appear in only a few games compared to the Zoras. Master Thief Garrett 22:08, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I think this section is maybe too large. It's filled with mostly speculation. Also, I tried to copyedit it and had to guess a couple times at the meaning of certain sentences. I hope I didn't misinterpret anything. Anyone have opinions on this section? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? If nobody objects (does anybody even watch this page?), and I remember, I'll clean it up.
I'm also on a campaign to eliminate writing in the second person. It makes the article sound like a walkthrough, or at least something severely unprofessional. Among the articles that I edit, writing in the second person seems to be most prominent in video game-related articles. I don't know if this is because the topic lends itself to walkthrough-style writing, or if it's because the author of a video game article is more likely to write informally. Aerion //talk 04:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
I wonder if I should make evolution its own section...
I don't even see why there's any speculation about it. The whole point of the getting Medlii is because she's a decendent of the Zora sage. There's truly no question of evolution - it's pretty plain to see that it happened and it's almost explicitly explained that way in the game. The same goes for the Koroks. They were originally the Kokiri children.--
Cwiddofer
05:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I was under the impression Japas was the band's bassist. Perhaps I'll have to play MM again. - 211.28.142.247 04:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
No, you don't have to play MM again. Japas is the band's bassist.
I have always wondered whether Mikau and Lulu had any sort of relationship, and by that I mean something more than a friendship. I was once told that Lulu's children were Mikau's as well, but the game itself doesn't give any sort of evidence. Any thoughts?
Zaraeph has made some reference to your questioning my credentials. Is there a problem? -- Mjformica 13:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your edit to Sakina bint Hussain - neutrality was significantly improved, good work! T. J. Day 00:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I changed the fanon names "Sea Zora" and "River Zora" into "Friendly Zora" and "Hostile Zora". I copied the Oracle series part into the Friendly Zora bit too, since it also concerns them. I then split the section into two, the part that reffers to the friendly zora, and the part that reffers to the hostile, and moving them accordingly - Saimdusan4:13 PM 7 June 2006
Don't think us noble sea Zoras the same as those savage, vulgar river Zoras! You're in the wrong place if you want to complain about being attacked by a river Zora.
My point was not that if the Mu'tazili position regarding hadith is mentioned then the QA position should follow. Due to the historical impact the Mu'tazilah have had they are much more worthy of mention than the QA. Per wp:undue, the QAers simply do not warrant mention as they numbers are negligible. The Mu'tazili page has a section on their position regarding hadith, although I think it is unreferenced. Supertouch ( talk) 20:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. @ User:GeographieMan: No need for a RM discussion in cases like this. You can ask for quick assistance at WP:RMTR. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 15:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Zora (razločitev) → Zora – Unintentionally moved; please revert everything since I can't. — GeographieMan[ ~MSG~ 14:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)