This article was nominated for deletion on December 25, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Considering that Wikipedia editors are some of those who can be defined as "You", does this article go against the auto-bibliography and maybe avoid-self refs and other policies? (This was mentioned at least a little bit in the deletion discussion) Jason McHuff ( talk) 10:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe this page is best merged with either the main Time Person of the Year article, or arguably the main You page. Having this page opens the door as an argument for any previous Time Person of the Year winner having their own page dealing with their Person of the Year accolade, regardless of the unusual abstract quality of this particular nomination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.94.19 ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Why is "4chan" italicised in the first paragraph? 123.176.119.19 ( talk) 03:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Concerned about new "Contributors of User-generated Content" section that is clearly vandalism. (Batman? Really?) I undid it, and now a registered user just put it back. Help? 128.12.252.5 ( talk) 03:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
"You were chosen in 2006..." or "You was chosen in 2006..."? This gets edited back and forth every once in a while, and I'd like to figure out which form is the best. After that, a simple comment in the prose should fix the edit warring. So, preferences and arguments for "were" vs "was"? ~ Mable ( chat) 09:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
You (Time Person of the Year). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
The second sentence of the lede currently reads:
This award recognized the millions of people who anonymously contribute...
(my emphasis) Surely a mistake? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello all. Reading through the comments, I realize there seemed to be an emerging consensus about deleting or renaming the page (first comment topic above), but nothing ever came of it.
I think the page should remain, but I propose a rename. The concept discussed in the article, as defined by the topic's main page, is an annual special issue of a magazine, not the person (or concept) itself. Thus, the title could be: 2006 Person of the Year Time Magazine issue. The first sentence of the lede could be tweaked to: The 2006 Person of the Year Time Magazine issue recognized "You" to represent the millions... Robincantin ( talk) 22:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Nijamuddin NIJAMJR ( talk) 07:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect You.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 16#You. until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
"and other wikis" thats biased. only wikipedia says these things cause the editors like wikis 93.135.33.119 ( talk) 21:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on December 25, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Considering that Wikipedia editors are some of those who can be defined as "You", does this article go against the auto-bibliography and maybe avoid-self refs and other policies? (This was mentioned at least a little bit in the deletion discussion) Jason McHuff ( talk) 10:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe this page is best merged with either the main Time Person of the Year article, or arguably the main You page. Having this page opens the door as an argument for any previous Time Person of the Year winner having their own page dealing with their Person of the Year accolade, regardless of the unusual abstract quality of this particular nomination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.94.19 ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Why is "4chan" italicised in the first paragraph? 123.176.119.19 ( talk) 03:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Concerned about new "Contributors of User-generated Content" section that is clearly vandalism. (Batman? Really?) I undid it, and now a registered user just put it back. Help? 128.12.252.5 ( talk) 03:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
"You were chosen in 2006..." or "You was chosen in 2006..."? This gets edited back and forth every once in a while, and I'd like to figure out which form is the best. After that, a simple comment in the prose should fix the edit warring. So, preferences and arguments for "were" vs "was"? ~ Mable ( chat) 09:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
You (Time Person of the Year). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
The second sentence of the lede currently reads:
This award recognized the millions of people who anonymously contribute...
(my emphasis) Surely a mistake? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello all. Reading through the comments, I realize there seemed to be an emerging consensus about deleting or renaming the page (first comment topic above), but nothing ever came of it.
I think the page should remain, but I propose a rename. The concept discussed in the article, as defined by the topic's main page, is an annual special issue of a magazine, not the person (or concept) itself. Thus, the title could be: 2006 Person of the Year Time Magazine issue. The first sentence of the lede could be tweaked to: The 2006 Person of the Year Time Magazine issue recognized "You" to represent the millions... Robincantin ( talk) 22:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Nijamuddin NIJAMJR ( talk) 07:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect You.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 16#You. until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
"and other wikis" thats biased. only wikipedia says these things cause the editors like wikis 93.135.33.119 ( talk) 21:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)