![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
not — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZooPro ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
No need for me to see this movie now - I can work it out from the Plot section!
Surely this could be trimmed down by someone who HAS seen it. The entire plot section is far too long. Ozzieboy ( talk) 17:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The plot summary is far too long, and is filled with tense swapping and unfitting rhetoric. I could understand these misgivings if this was not a well known film, but it is recognizable enough that I feel a better article could be written, particularly the plot section. 2600:4041:4B7:9C00:4C5:C42B:3484:90D2 ( talk) 01:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
not — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZooPro ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
No need for me to see this movie now - I can work it out from the Plot section!
Surely this could be trimmed down by someone who HAS seen it. The entire plot section is far too long. Ozzieboy ( talk) 17:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The plot summary is far too long, and is filled with tense swapping and unfitting rhetoric. I could understand these misgivings if this was not a well known film, but it is recognizable enough that I feel a better article could be written, particularly the plot section. 2600:4041:4B7:9C00:4C5:C42B:3484:90D2 ( talk) 01:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)