This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
You'd have to ask the editor who created the redirect eight years ago. But it's been the primary topic stably ever since. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
12:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Support Even if there were no other Yilgarns, "Yilgarn Craton" would be a better title, this is a case where
wp:precise has the upper hand over
wp:concise. As it is there are too many things related to the Yilgarn area to be a wp:priamrytopic.
walkvictor falktalk23:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)reply
No one is suggesting
Yilgarn Craton be moved from that current, better title, so the application of
WP:PRECISE and
WP:CONCISE to that article's title don't impact the titling of the dab page or the primary topic of the title "Yilgarn". "Too many things" is also not a primary topic criterion. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
14:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I see no evidence that any of the subdivisions of the Craton upsets the longstanding primacy of the Craton.
bd2412T18:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per BD2412. Given the long-standing status of the Craton as the primary topic at the base title, the
burden is on the proposer to demonstrate why the current status should change. No substantive case in this regard is made.
Xoloz (
talk)
16:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
You'd have to ask the editor who created the redirect eight years ago. But it's been the primary topic stably ever since. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
12:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Support Even if there were no other Yilgarns, "Yilgarn Craton" would be a better title, this is a case where
wp:precise has the upper hand over
wp:concise. As it is there are too many things related to the Yilgarn area to be a wp:priamrytopic.
walkvictor falktalk23:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)reply
No one is suggesting
Yilgarn Craton be moved from that current, better title, so the application of
WP:PRECISE and
WP:CONCISE to that article's title don't impact the titling of the dab page or the primary topic of the title "Yilgarn". "Too many things" is also not a primary topic criterion. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
14:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I see no evidence that any of the subdivisions of the Craton upsets the longstanding primacy of the Craton.
bd2412T18:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per BD2412. Given the long-standing status of the Craton as the primary topic at the base title, the
burden is on the proposer to demonstrate why the current status should change. No substantive case in this regard is made.
Xoloz (
talk)
16:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.