Year of Luigi has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 3, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Year of Luigi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Year of Luigi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Year of Luigi appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 April 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Z1720 (
talk) 01:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Created by Panini! ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC).
None of these work as AFD hooks IMO (and I have no idea what "parkour" is a reference to). It's also very obvious that the hooks are about the super Mario brothers games, which practically everybody on the planet must be familiar with. So without a better angle, I think this one would have to be a scratching for AFD. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
( edit conflict) No I wasn't being sarcastic - I think everybody who owns a computer has probably heard of Super Mario Bros. And I don't know what you mean by "appeal to a broader audience". There are two issues I raised with the hooks, firstly that "parkour" is mystifying, secondly that the hooks are not AFD-ish. Neither relates to "appeal to a broader audience" that I can discern. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Okay, thank you for the explanation of "parkour", I guess there might be an AFD angle in there somewhere then, but the first thing you would need to do is actually provide an explanation or at least a link to parkour in the article itself - I couldn't see one when I looked. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
New serious hooks, no longer an AFD's nomination. A second reviewer is requested:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Earwig flagged a few passages, but they appeared to be quotes. Approving Alt1a -- evrik ( talk) 04:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Promoted ALT1a to Prep 3. Z1720 ( talk) 01:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PerryPerryD ( talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Christ, already? Ok, I am PerryPerryD and I will be reviewing this article. Panini has shown great articles in the past so I have no reason to doubt this article being an exception, however, I review each article equally, regardless of previous reputation. With that, I will now begin. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright: The Year of Luigi Logo is already a concern of mine due to the Luigi Sprite on it. I would advise using an alternative logo, Such as the YoL Logo without the Luigi Sprite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
There were a few other prose issues in this article, however I proceeded to fix these myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Pass. All claims appear to be validly sourced and only 1 Primary source is used (Citation 54:Nintendo).
Pass, Going into detail of the specific Luigi themed games released during this period, and with those sections being shorter than the main focus of the article, This gives due weight to all parts of the article and allows the article to be spread out and broad.
Pass. This article does not praise or criticize the Year of Luigi other than for the reception section which is quoted by reviewers and is Not representative of the authors opinion in question. No outside critique is given in this aritcle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Automatic Pass. Past 2018, Panini has been the sole major contributor with the exception of 2 editors, which automatically prevents edit warring to have taken place.
Pass but please be careful, the Luigi sprite shown in the logo makes copyright complex, A fair use rationale does apply here however.
With the issues I stated above fixed, I see absolutely no reason to deny this article. Well done again Panini!. Congratulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Year of Luigi has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 3, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Year of Luigi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Year of Luigi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Year of Luigi appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 April 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Z1720 (
talk) 01:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Created by Panini! ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC).
None of these work as AFD hooks IMO (and I have no idea what "parkour" is a reference to). It's also very obvious that the hooks are about the super Mario brothers games, which practically everybody on the planet must be familiar with. So without a better angle, I think this one would have to be a scratching for AFD. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
( edit conflict) No I wasn't being sarcastic - I think everybody who owns a computer has probably heard of Super Mario Bros. And I don't know what you mean by "appeal to a broader audience". There are two issues I raised with the hooks, firstly that "parkour" is mystifying, secondly that the hooks are not AFD-ish. Neither relates to "appeal to a broader audience" that I can discern. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Okay, thank you for the explanation of "parkour", I guess there might be an AFD angle in there somewhere then, but the first thing you would need to do is actually provide an explanation or at least a link to parkour in the article itself - I couldn't see one when I looked. Gatoclass ( talk) 02:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
New serious hooks, no longer an AFD's nomination. A second reviewer is requested:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Earwig flagged a few passages, but they appeared to be quotes. Approving Alt1a -- evrik ( talk) 04:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Promoted ALT1a to Prep 3. Z1720 ( talk) 01:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PerryPerryD ( talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Christ, already? Ok, I am PerryPerryD and I will be reviewing this article. Panini has shown great articles in the past so I have no reason to doubt this article being an exception, however, I review each article equally, regardless of previous reputation. With that, I will now begin. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright: The Year of Luigi Logo is already a concern of mine due to the Luigi Sprite on it. I would advise using an alternative logo, Such as the YoL Logo without the Luigi Sprite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
There were a few other prose issues in this article, however I proceeded to fix these myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Pass. All claims appear to be validly sourced and only 1 Primary source is used (Citation 54:Nintendo).
Pass, Going into detail of the specific Luigi themed games released during this period, and with those sections being shorter than the main focus of the article, This gives due weight to all parts of the article and allows the article to be spread out and broad.
Pass. This article does not praise or criticize the Year of Luigi other than for the reception section which is quoted by reviewers and is Not representative of the authors opinion in question. No outside critique is given in this aritcle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Automatic Pass. Past 2018, Panini has been the sole major contributor with the exception of 2 editors, which automatically prevents edit warring to have taken place.
Pass but please be careful, the Luigi sprite shown in the logo makes copyright complex, A fair use rationale does apply here however.
With the issues I stated above fixed, I see absolutely no reason to deny this article. Well done again Panini!. Congratulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)