This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yaquina (language) should probably have its own article, but since this one is such a small stub as it is, I'm leaving it this way until it gets expanded. Katr67 21:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be
renamed and moved.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 03:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
– See rationale for this group of moves on Talk:Chipewyan people#Requested move. Not that many of the standalone forms are already redirects, indicating the previous unnecessary move. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
*
Amikwa people →
Amikwa
– See rationale for this group of moves on Talk:Chipewyan people#Requested move. Not that many of the standalone forms are already redirects, indicating the previous unnecessary move. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment on this close - WP:BATHWATER applies. Those that are redirects to current title should all have been moved for obvious reasons, whatever other dab/primary topic issue might be in only some. That many of these moves were done by speedy without any consensus at all, and in violation of various guidelines, is grating given the arduous nature of using procedure to correct wanton, ill-advised, needless moves. WP:UNDAB applies in all cases. Looks like I'm gonna have to re-RM all the redirect-to-current ones. Thanks for the workload. Have a nice day....I won't. Skookum1 ( talk) 03:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yaquina (language) should probably have its own article, but since this one is such a small stub as it is, I'm leaving it this way until it gets expanded. Katr67 21:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be
renamed and moved.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 03:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
– See rationale for this group of moves on Talk:Chipewyan people#Requested move. Not that many of the standalone forms are already redirects, indicating the previous unnecessary move. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
*
Amikwa people →
Amikwa
– See rationale for this group of moves on Talk:Chipewyan people#Requested move. Not that many of the standalone forms are already redirects, indicating the previous unnecessary move. Skookum1 ( talk) 09:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment on this close - WP:BATHWATER applies. Those that are redirects to current title should all have been moved for obvious reasons, whatever other dab/primary topic issue might be in only some. That many of these moves were done by speedy without any consensus at all, and in violation of various guidelines, is grating given the arduous nature of using procedure to correct wanton, ill-advised, needless moves. WP:UNDAB applies in all cases. Looks like I'm gonna have to re-RM all the redirect-to-current ones. Thanks for the workload. Have a nice day....I won't. Skookum1 ( talk) 03:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)