![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
First off, the two external links provided aren't working. Second, the titles of these links ["British Invasion and the Birth of the Myth of "Tibetan Independence""] appear - to me - to be rather 'nationalist' of tone and content.
How to proceed? Qwrk ( talk) 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I completely agree. The links should be removed since they are broken. They should be removed anyway since the title informs us that they prejudge the issue of whether Tibet was an independent state, i.e. they are propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestNab ( talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
ASDFGH, you didn't put any edit summary while deleting transliterations here. Can you explain why you deleted them? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 01:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
First off, the two external links provided aren't working. Second, the titles of these links ["British Invasion and the Birth of the Myth of "Tibetan Independence""] appear - to me - to be rather 'nationalist' of tone and content.
How to proceed? Qwrk ( talk) 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I completely agree. The links should be removed since they are broken. They should be removed anyway since the title informs us that they prejudge the issue of whether Tibet was an independent state, i.e. they are propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestNab ( talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
ASDFGH, you didn't put any edit summary while deleting transliterations here. Can you explain why you deleted them? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 01:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)