This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, 23 February 2007, see discussion. Restore article, 2 February 2007, see discussion. Delete, 23 December 2006, see discussion. Delete, 8 September 2006, see discussion. Delete, 30 January 2006, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pornography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DillN 04:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey - this thing is just started. This is my first article - feel free to edit and expand it. I guess I forgot to call it a stub. I'll go back and do that now.

Note: this article is a recreation of a previously deleted article. Rklawton 13:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Actually, this is a restore of a previously deleted article. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 2. The biggest problem found with the prior AFDs was a fairly common belief that nobody who opined delete actually looked at the sources offered in those AFDs. GRBerry 14:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Actually, reading the deletion review, at least some opiners thought the earlier version at XXXchurch was better. I'm going to redirect that here and restore history underneath for people's editing fun. GRBerry 14:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

If you don't mind, I modified your URL slightly, GRBerry, linking directly to the non redirected page. Nardman1 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't mind, and thanks for teaching me a new trick. Now if I'll be able to remember it is another question... GRBerry 22:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

The deletion of this article was overturned in this deletion review log. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/04/porn.addiction/index.html --- RockMFR 16:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Where is the neutrality disputed? Should the tag be taken off? Omishark 16:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC) reply

There doesn't seem to be a dispute. Lacking one, I'm taking the tag off. Thanatosimii 08:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply

The tag appears to have been added here, back when the article clearly did appear as ad. Perhaps the IP should have added {{ ad}} instead of {{ NPOV}}, but I agree the article is in better shape since the tag was added. -- Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 23:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Reflist #18 Citation in section "Craig Gross" credits him as "an international speaker and author" and cites it with a ref to Craig Gross' website. Hardly an appropriate citation IMO. Mjpresson ( talk) 19:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on XXXchurch.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080517053608/http://www.malone.edu/1446 to http://www.malone.edu/1446

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XXXchurch.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110612170241/http://tvulive.com:80/radiou/riot2.htm to http://www.tvulive.com/radiou/riot2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply