![]() | Worms Armageddon has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 5, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Worms Armageddon received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | A fact from Worms Armageddon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
In my N64 version, many of the stated customization possibilities )including the map editor) are unavailible. Is this the same for all N64 copies? 81.16.160.34 ( talk) 10:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
I suggest moving the article to Worms: Armageddon, as the colon is typically added to titles such as these. SharkD ( talk) 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
This article used to have this screenshot, but
consensus is to remove the image because it fails
WP:NFCC#8, for there has not been a discussion of reviewers describing how the graphics are different from the original's. Actually, there is talk about it now, especially given that IGN described the graphics as "quirky". That said, should the extra screenshots in
Elite (video game) be deleted as well because the article does not discuss about reviewers describing the graphics as very different from the original version's?
Gamingforfun365
(talk) 16:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freikorp ( talk · contribs) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Be advised I tend to make minor changes myself as I go. If you're unhappy with any change I make just revert it and we'll talk about it instead. :)
Freikorp (
talk) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
I personally think this is an important one, and should definitely remain the part of the article, omitting it leaves its readers without full and pottentially useful additional information about differences between various releases of the game. The reason for reverting mentioned unreliable sources, but i don't think there are better ones, and instead of removing that section, it should've been left until it gets updated with better source references. Please revert it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.203.231 ( talk) 22:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Worms Armageddon has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 5, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Worms Armageddon received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | A fact from Worms Armageddon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my N64 version, many of the stated customization possibilities )including the map editor) are unavailible. Is this the same for all N64 copies? 81.16.160.34 ( talk) 10:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
I suggest moving the article to Worms: Armageddon, as the colon is typically added to titles such as these. SharkD ( talk) 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
This article used to have this screenshot, but
consensus is to remove the image because it fails
WP:NFCC#8, for there has not been a discussion of reviewers describing how the graphics are different from the original's. Actually, there is talk about it now, especially given that IGN described the graphics as "quirky". That said, should the extra screenshots in
Elite (video game) be deleted as well because the article does not discuss about reviewers describing the graphics as very different from the original version's?
Gamingforfun365
(talk) 16:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freikorp ( talk · contribs) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Be advised I tend to make minor changes myself as I go. If you're unhappy with any change I make just revert it and we'll talk about it instead. :)
Freikorp (
talk) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
I personally think this is an important one, and should definitely remain the part of the article, omitting it leaves its readers without full and pottentially useful additional information about differences between various releases of the game. The reason for reverting mentioned unreliable sources, but i don't think there are better ones, and instead of removing that section, it should've been left until it gets updated with better source references. Please revert it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.203.231 ( talk) 22:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)