This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I really don’t know why this page really exists. I mean, what’s the purpose…? Sure, it was fan-influential, but I whymake a Wikipedia article for this pokemon in particular? What are you planning to do, make articles for ‘em all? I don’t know…I think this is useless as long as Bulbapedia exists..
Inaturlist Lover (
talk) 12:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Wooloo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hello! I will be reviewing the article. I am honoured to do so, as I’m kind of a Pokémon fan myself (guess my favourite Pokémon if you want to, but I can confirm it is not Wooloo). So far, the significant problem is the MoS violations.
Prose
A mention of
Shigeru Ohmori’s reaction to the critical reception of the Pokémon is not present in the prose, despite being in the
lead.
It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
Done!
Sources/Citations
(Optional) Try adding secondary sources, but I’ll leave them be if such sources are not available. I helped you with one of them.
The only concern, the overuse of FN 7 (primary source). It’s used four times on this page.
Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
Done.
Copy-vios
Nothing special from Earwig, but I’ll let that 26.5% be.
Images
So far, so good!
(Optional) If you can, try adding more Wooloo pics.
I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
Very well then, I will pass it.
Brachy08(Talk) 10:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I really don’t know why this page really exists. I mean, what’s the purpose…? Sure, it was fan-influential, but I whymake a Wikipedia article for this pokemon in particular? What are you planning to do, make articles for ‘em all? I don’t know…I think this is useless as long as Bulbapedia exists..
Inaturlist Lover (
talk) 12:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Wooloo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hello! I will be reviewing the article. I am honoured to do so, as I’m kind of a Pokémon fan myself (guess my favourite Pokémon if you want to, but I can confirm it is not Wooloo). So far, the significant problem is the MoS violations.
Prose
A mention of
Shigeru Ohmori’s reaction to the critical reception of the Pokémon is not present in the prose, despite being in the
lead.
It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
Done!
Sources/Citations
(Optional) Try adding secondary sources, but I’ll leave them be if such sources are not available. I helped you with one of them.
The only concern, the overuse of FN 7 (primary source). It’s used four times on this page.
Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
Done.
Copy-vios
Nothing special from Earwig, but I’ll let that 26.5% be.
Images
So far, so good!
(Optional) If you can, try adding more Wooloo pics.
I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
Very well then, I will pass it.
Brachy08(Talk) 10:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.