This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The result was: rejected by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Nominator has done nothing to address the concerns noted at
WT:DYK and here, and clearly thinks it's not their responsibility to do so; this nomination is closed.
Created by GiantSnowman ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC).
Articles that fail to deal adequately with the topic are also likely to be rejected.Completely omitting three of four countries comes under this, and I imagine it will be significant work to cover them in similar depth to England. As it stands, the article is a rather arbitrary collection of women and dates and facts and one-sentence paragraphs (over half of which start "In 19xx"); it could use more organization and more narrative. It needs significant work if this nomination is to be viable. BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The result was: rejected by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Nominator has done nothing to address the concerns noted at
WT:DYK and here, and clearly thinks it's not their responsibility to do so; this nomination is closed.
Created by GiantSnowman ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC).
Articles that fail to deal adequately with the topic are also likely to be rejected.Completely omitting three of four countries comes under this, and I imagine it will be significant work to cover them in similar depth to England. As it stands, the article is a rather arbitrary collection of women and dates and facts and one-sentence paragraphs (over half of which start "In 19xx"); it could use more organization and more narrative. It needs significant work if this nomination is to be viable. BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)