This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Winx Club article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about reviews, fan opinions, or other forum-like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about reviews, fan opinions, or other forum-like topics at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Layla/Aisha is really only a feminist in the 4kids versions; she is actually quite shy and submissive in the original version. I tried to put something explaining that in her character guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.249.69 ( talk) 00:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
That is most definitely wrong, you might be following the 4kids version there, they become guardian fairies of the magic dimension, not queens! Winxrocker ( talk) 10:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I have the first batch of English titles for "Winx Club". I needs to be formatted, if you please. User:NoseNuggets 08:25 PM EDT 05/26/05.
I would like if I get help, or at the least a "OK" from the major contributors of the article, to rewrite the article into two distinct catagories to properly explain the first and second seasons. It is my opinion that article is messy, with overlapping information/spoilers and US/italian conversions making it worse.--
Kevin586 19:31, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
I ahppen to like to piolers. Just put a Spoliers warnning on there and let people decide for themselves. THe article isnt that messy. THe only part that needs cleaning is the hamburgeress TRIX ( 69.150.74.114 21:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC))
Which name is correct?
I never saw the original edition (I only saw the 4KIDS TV edition, so I think it's Mariam. or Miriam. Or... well. it's the M at the end. But I'm not really sure. --Addict 2006 17:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC) The original Italian version gives their names as Marion and Oritel. Marian in Italian is pronounced Maariion, which would sound a bit odd in English, so they changed her name to Miriam in the 4kids edition Winxrocker ( talk) 10:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC) Her true name is Marion ([User talk: WinxfulLight]) 12:27, 30 July 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.162.76.18 ( talk)
I heard about this reference several times but I never seen any actual evidence that she is infused with any cyberneticss. Can someone point me to any Winx Club comic or animated series episode that assert she is half-machine?-- Kevin586 19:10, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
In the booklet that came with the 1st two DVDs released in Australia it says in the section about Tecna "Others: She is half android".
In one episode when Tecna cries she says "I didn't know I could cry" which could mean shes a cyborg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.82.192 ( talk) 15:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I think it would be helpful if we just looked at bare facts instead of inferences. Does anyone have information from the official website or a line from the original Italian version which proves she's an android or cyborg? Cailunet rawr 03:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
For the Australian DVD, I think it's an error made by 4Kids may be? I can tell you, at least, she's not any kind of robot. I can't just clarify whether she is either human or alien because the mail characters are came from outer space... -- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 07:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Tecna is not a cyborg. Cyborgs are robots, they have no magic powers. Also, cyborgs can't show feelings but Tecna is able to show happiness, angry and sadness. Besides, most of the so-called facts on fan fiction are made up. There is no information on the official website that says she is a machine or half of one. Let's face the facts. The creators never mentioned s until they do this idea is impossible.
Does the Italian vs. English diffrences belong here? The series is broadcasted in other languages, where there are yet other names for places etc.
In my opinion, Winx is the compound word of Minx and Wink 성혀니
Should the content the Icy, Stormy, and Darcy be integerated in the primary Winx club article? list your vote supporting or opposing with optional explaination.
for the edits section why are people promoting their own sites and agendas?
Hey the article is already over the limit size of 32kb, right? So why no one has see it and do something about it. Dial-Up user has a hard time to load this page
On other Winx Club websites I saw that there will be third season of Winx Club with 2 new Winx girls. I really couldn't understand when it was going to air because they spoke spanish. ---These are bad rumors that have been copied from site to site all summer long.
The Third season has been announced on 4kids TV, but there isn't any info on the 2 new Winx girls yet. User:Coconutfred73
I hate to say this but the third season is already over. There are no new winx girls, the villian is called Valtor and all six girls have a form called Enchantix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.10.247 ( talk) 10:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
the sections that are long shoud be placed in their own articles, then the Winx Club others article could be re-merged into the main article. -- Cartoonborg 22:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The question before us is simple as it difficult: should the major editors merge Winx Club and Winx Club Others? List Oppose or support with an explaination, if you like.
Support if certain conditions are met - The current Winx Club article is serious need of pruning and editing to accomidate the possible merge. First and formost, the current winx club article should be abot the television program as opposed to its current "universe"-like definition. What I suggest is eliminating most of the character entries of characters who only appeared once and/or do not contribute the major story of the series. The "monsters" section should also eliminated.-- Kenn Caesius 20:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
SUPPORT The article were split for some reason related to the legnth of the complete article. Therefore the minor charachers could be put in one article with the title "minor characers in winx club" Also the sections could be moved in to seprate articles as I sugested aboue. --
Cartoonborg
17:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
SUPPORT Here's a little suggestion - why not have shorter introductory paragraphs linking to seperate main articles for the major characters, including pictures, character bios, list of magical abiites etc? That way a bit of space could be saved on the main page AND the characters could be covered in more detail.
Nisa Tunesque
08:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Having worked the article for Bloom for the past few days, I have about a situation that all editors should consider: How to adress the discrepancies across the different versions of the winx club. Doing some quick reseach for the bloom article, bloom has about three different birthdays and the spelling of her homeplanet different. There is no doubt that as the editing continues we will continue to find more. To address in the artcle this, I would recommend the following
Citing the controversy of the editing and censoring done by 4kids Entertainment in the north american version of the winx club, I do not consider it accurate an source or representation of the original italian version. In the bloom article I have been creating, I retrieved most the information and spelling from wwww.winxclub.com and not www.winxclub.tv, a 4kids entertainment website. The .com is supported by the production company that created the series.
With this in mind, I would suggest that future editors try to verify the appropriate information against the .com website. Please keep any questions or comments in this discussion page.-- Kenn Caesius 17:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi! My name's K-9 LVR, I'm a big fan of Winx Club, and I've decided to set up some recaps for the episodes! It's really fun, but Season 1 is also kind of hard, because it's been a while, and I'm going from memory. Anyone can chip in if they want to, and they know I've missed something; I won't mind! -- K-9 LVR 00:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Its quite a ambitious project you have decided to undertake however I am not at all sure about spending the time and effort in creating individual episode articles in light the of the current problems with the main winx club article.
On the subject of how to best list the episodes of the winx club, for the time being I would suggest a listing like the List of South Park episodes but without the links to every episode: there are just not enough editors knowledgeable or dedicated enough to create and maintain them (yet). As always, if anyone thinks they have a better idea, we should have discussion and vote on it.-- Kenn Caesius 19:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I was going to bring this up this weekend but in light of Malkinann edits and suggestions, now is the time dicuss such matters before anymore major changes occur.
First off, I would like like say that I really like the direction that malkinann is taking this article and in support of her suggestions to create the new article List of minor Winx Club characters.
However, this is only the beginning. As I was about to purpose this weekend, this article in need of more splits because the article has become too long, very unorganized, and the ubiquitous "Places, Location, and Characters" is doing more than it should. To adress this, I would like to suggest following article names:
List of minor Winx Club locations
Within the main article itself, I feel that less is more and suggest consolidating characters into simpler subcatagories such as this proposed outline:
Main Characters
Supporting Characters
Broadacasting
Other media
Ultimately, talk is cheap. I would like to hear from other editors regarding how to proceded with this article.-- Kenn Caesius 19:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, I've been bold, and gotten rid of most of the character information from the main article and created the minor characters list. Once the List of minor Winx Club characters is cleaned up a little, maybe we could consider spinning out The Specialists and the Pixies into their own articles, like The Specialists (Winx Club) and Pixies (Winx Club)? I didn't want to link to any Specialists or Pixies just atm, because of this possibility. I'd agree that some of the *very* minor fairies perhaps don't need wiki space, but I'd rather leave that to someone else's judgement. On the bright side, both the new list and the main article are under the long-page limit! :)
If you're not sure if the monsters of the day are notable, then maybe they should go in episode summaries/articles? What I was thinking of doing with the Winx Club Other article was merging in the merchandise and links to the main page, and then renaming the page Winx Club (English versions), or Winx Club (controversy), and then we can use that article to complain about the dubs' editing etc. as well as the inevitable-seeming accusations of witchcraft. - Malkinann 00:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
It has been a incredible week of shuffling, editing, and moving content now I would like to ask all those that have contributed: Do you like the main winx club article as it is?
Far be it for me to say we are finished but with the article refitted and finally allowed to expand, what more can be added and changed (apart from the "realm of magix" section and the feature film section) that cannot be integrate with the with the "season", "minor characters", and character biography articles? There is additional work to be done in those articles but now we have finally have space and direction to get it right.-- Kenn Caesius 16:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It looks a lot better than it was. We need to think about what we're going to do with the rest of the Winx Club Others article, and get a proper logo up in the TV box. Was the only section that was deleted outright the " Monsters" section? - Malkinann 02:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Just checking that the Monsters section was all that ended up deleted. :) I think we've done good! - Malkinann 04:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I have removed one hopeless entry because I could not rewrite to make any sense have editted the rest so that they would. However, I seriously considering deleting them soon: me reason for doing so is most the "edits" mentioned are neglible and would perhaps fall under the catagory of localization, which simply cannot be helped in international releases
The other reason I will considering removing the content is because the reliability is questionaable. The removed entry refering to changes in "Miss Magix" seems to describe the episode as it aired under the 4Kids TV banner.
Finally some of this content would be best included in episode summeries as per my suggestion in the hidden comments. Unless some disagrees, I will ultimately remove all edits within the next week.-- Kenn Caesius 18:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
In season 3, there is a new bay guy but the name is still a mystery eventhough 4Kids already air it and name him ""Baltor"" but on Winx Club offical website him name is called ""Valtor""
I think it's valtor. the website says so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I think there is enough information of the plot to mention it briefly in the main article and go into detail in a article of its own with one of those "television program in progress" tags. Would anyone disagree?-- Kenn Caesius 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I think it's Valtor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Here http://www.winxclubontour.com/ there seems to be a Winx Club musical in Italy that is touring the Netherlands. Does anyone know more about it, or can they understand the site? - Malkinann 23:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I've found this toy, an automatic peer review suggestions bot, and I ran it through the Winx Club article. The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Malkinann 07:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the "Winx Club - Cut It Out!" link even allowed to stay on? It just got removed. -- Addict 2006 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I seriously doubt spin-offs relating to Stell and Trix are true. I have conducted informal research using the the search string "winx club +spin-off" on google and yahoo! searches about the closest those words get together is during a discussion of fan fiction. I say that if no source is provided by the end of this month, the entire section should be removed.-- Kevin586 18:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I thought it was suspicious. Just remove it or something. or maybe I'd speedy tag it right now. -- Addict 2006 16:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
But I think that history will absolve me. I have gone ahead and created the new season three article as the section was becoming too large and with new episode of the series premiering weekly now, it is only bound to get larger. I will update the to-do list next to removed its mention and request that future editors focus thier attention on copyediting the content of all winx club articles.-- Kevin586 18:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Going the official website just posted by an editor, I have noticed some discrepancy of the title: according to the italian text on the bottom is its winx club - il segrete de regno perduto which (off the top of my head ) translates into "secret of the lost king". However, when the preview is over, its simply winx club il film. Can someone suggest how to deal with this?-- Kevin586 06:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, this may well be a teaser trailer. This situation might be in a different country/area, but the third Pokemon movie suffered a name change as well (right after a teaser trailer came out). -- Addict 2006 03:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The Finalised name is "Winx Club: Secret of the lost kingdom" which is supposed to succeed the third season where the girls help Bloom find out about her true parent, also with the help of a man named Haggen who once knew Bloom's parents , King Oritel and Queen Marion. -- User: WinxfulLight 12:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.162.76.18 ( talk)
They have just released volume 3 of season two a little whille ago , just though you might like to know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.184.174.220 ( talk) 06:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
I have reviewed most the of the unofficial links and nearly all of them are poorly made fansites with no useful information. Unless someone can justify their inclusion in this article, I will be removing them by the Tuesday, May 8th.-- Kevin586 18:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I have hidden the entire section regarding localization and versions out of concern to that of the content is unsourced and perhaps may not be suitable for this english language version of this article.
Regarding claims that the series has edited, can someone cite credible sources (by wikipedia's standards) that there are distinct versions? While I believe these claims, I think there has been some confusion over localization and distinct versions. It has been my stance from my early involvement with this article to leave the localization content with the respective foriegn language article.
Another reason, I have eliminated the section to avoid encouraging the fancruft from creating one giant uncited wall of text of edits. If someone can cite a edit (in the series) I say it should be moved the season articles, character articles, or stay, if it effects the entire series.-- Kevin586 18:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
i'd like to say that Kevin 586 has convinced me. the comments i wrote on changes in story due to the fact commercials are longer in america was just something i felt should be said. now however i see that specific information should be placed in character, episode, or a "differences" article(s). However i still stand by that this article should still state that there are 2 english dubbed versions of the shows to clear up confusion in other english speaking countries and explain why there are differences.
I've assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of important sections like critical response, production etc. and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. These categories are arbritrary and are subject to review by any editor who feels confident to do so.
I think the article really needs a response section. Has the show ever won an award? Has it ever been reviewed by a television critic? What are the ratings figures like? It would also benefit from a production section detailing the crew, animators, how the show is made, how it was conceived etc. At the moment the article is all plot and characters and there is very little out of universe perspective given.
There is information in the lead that is not part of the main article - the lead should be a summary of the content of the main article. See WP:Lead for advice on constructing the lead of the article.
Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.-- Opark 77 09:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
it says on floras page that 4kids changed her planets name, but in the season 3 lucy went 2 baltor and told him that they were going to linyphea, not wat they changed it 2, CONFUSION did they change the name? Joseph mitchell9 23:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please translate Japanese!! 221.79.35.16 ( talk) 10:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
He probably thinks Winx Club came from Japan. I swear, everytime America or any non-Japanese country has something good, people assume it's Japanese or a Japanese rip-off. CN Guy ( talk) 18:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
As requested I began some proofreading. I mainly fixed typos and adjusted bad grammar and style, as I am not very familiar with the contents of the series. I will remove the Style tag as soon as I am done, please let me know if you disagree. Also, I believe that the part about the Winx Musical should be moved to a separate article, or even removed completely. Is a musical only shown in Italy and Netherlands really worthy of more than a couple of lines, just for information? Are the names of the various actors/dancers worthy of inclusion? They simply elongate the article without reason in my opinion. Quatonik ( talk) 21:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh my tian, I'm getting soooo sick of those vandalism by many IP addresses! Its about time we semi-protect this article! >_< Agree? Tikal-chan ( talk) 14:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I was so surprised when I saw the article about the very first episode is titled " It Feels Like Magic" (4Kids version's title) while " An Unexpected Event" (Title used in the Rainbow's English dub) is a redirect to that article.
Then, two ideas quickly came to mind;
Which idea do you prefer?
When citing www.winxclub.com's English edition, I think we should be careful, as the edition seems currently for the UK where they get 4K's version.
I watched the episodes from the first to fifty second. However, I heard no mention of characters' birthdays, although two "official" sites mention two different dates per one character. How about this? In the infobox, data for birth date goes "Not mentioned during the TV series [1]" while the ref tag goes;
hi i'm posting this here and on the winx club disscusion page. why did you delete my section on Nabu on the main page. to me it only make sense to have him listed there as he is the boyfriend/fiancee. all the other girls boyfriends are listed there and still have more info on them under the List of minor Winx Club characters#The Specialists page. Inferno17 ( talk) 16:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
is there any news on the us release of the winx club The Secret of the Lost Kingdom movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.28.245 ( talk) 23:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, so I noticed some pages use Baltor (like the Template:Winx_Club and the Winx Club (season three), but others use Valtor, such as List of minor Winx Club characters and List of Winx Club episodes. Which one should we use? Matty-chan ( talk) 08:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Ummm, guys... please do not discuss the article's subject here. This is for discussion of the article and ways to improve it. We do not need to know that Winx Club is a hentai search term or that it ripped off W.I.T.C.H. because the main character has red hair and they're about girls learning magic. I cleaned up the talk page. Matty-chan ( talk) 08:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Based on the List of Naruto characters, new layout of character list page, to be named List of Winx Club characters, is under construction. It is located at User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/WC characters.
I will do my best for the layout. However, I need your help with the content. Therefore, you can improve the sandbox by adding content and gathering sources.
By the way, what should I do with the Redfountain specialists? Consider them as "protagonists" or "other characters"? -- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 12:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I keep seeing sections about this, but no sources. I've found fan-made videos on youtube, but no proof on the official site, in Italian or English. Should I just remove the unsourced information relating to the Elementix? Cailunet rawr 01:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
maybe we can have a character called Chelsea after the football team! She can be an Asian. She can have long, dark brown hair and is very skinny. Of couse she is beautiful. Her boyfriend can be a boy named Derek who has blonde hair and very handsome. He can also be the brother of Sky! she might have the power of the whole wide world and she is the princess of the Green Land. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Basically, 4kids vs. the original... Should we have some sort of guideline for whether which we use? And which one should we use? Cailunet rawr 02:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Yep. There's no official Japanese version yet. However, someone's adding incorrect role on the articles on the Japanese voice actresses. What should I do? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 06:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
There were still a lot of problems, I think they're fixed now. Here's a phrase I couldn't work in:
(even though the 4Kids version is shown in the UK, except Welsh language broadcaster S4C)
This may need its own separate sentence, I couldn't quite understand what was meant. A lot of work went into this article, and it's great the show has remained so popular - definitely notable, I think. If any further help is needed copyediting, you can contact me at my talk page.-- Levalley ( talk) 01:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
What I know is:
That's it. I wonder if those facts can be added to the end of Variations section, or not to put on anywhere of the article. But it should not be a seed for the revival of the old worldwide syndication section. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 08:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Go to Template:Winx Club to see what happened. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
OK. The template is semi-protected for one month. It's time to improve Template:Winx Club a better way. Any ideas? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to nominate this article for deletion. It requires more than eleven references, Amazon.com isn't a reliable source. This article needs expert help from editors of the WikiProject Television or the Television Portal. Wikipedia isn't a place where you can collect random information without reliable sources. An article that has less than 11 references and is categorized as B-class article is NOT NOTABLE!!! If no one responds on why we need to save this article, I'll put it up for deletion tomorrow. Electrode Light 10:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
NO DON'T. I like visiting this article. I don't care if it's B-class or has less than 11 references. At least say you'll make a new one, please. Pt018 ( talk) 11:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Pt018.
I have deleted the “transformation sequences” section from the article because the content is too specific to the general tone of the article and also taken removed the merge request for “Enchantix” and “Belivix” [sic] for the same reason. If anyone feels that his content should be included it should integrated the respective season or character articles.-- Kencaesi ( talk) 17:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
I tried to edit this article and I was told by User:JSH-alive that I messed up ; quoted
I wanted a structure of featured ones like The Simpsons and Tokyo Mew Mew. But you Carly messed up.
Now I don't know about you but I thought that an editor's goal is to improve an article into featured status but alas by judging the state of the article it nothing more than Start-class quality with B-class quantity of Low importance.
They're so many stub sections like Production and development, Conception, Albums and soundtracks with two of those sections containing nothing but a template encouraging contributors to expand the section with un-referenced statements. I don't about any of you but I'm tired of seeing the Variations section having no references at all. I tried to fix the article but I was bashed for removing all unsourced material, special thanks to JSH-alive for putting back all the nonsense in the page.
I suggest that User:JSH-alive reads Wikipedia:Writing better articles, Wikipedia:Article size, Wikipedia:Summary style, Wikipedia:Check your facts, Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words, Wikipedia:The perfect article. The fine print should be either delete all the un sourced material or do some research. I would help but I've been discouraged from editing this article. Greene Leigh Online ( talk) 11:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
/// FGSFDS —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
91.50.78.6 (
talk)
21:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
The article bears a frame saying:
I wonder if these remarks are still relevant; the article has now various references (including in third-party publications), the style seems fine, and seems clean. Let me know what are the reasons for the article still to bear this criticism; otherwise I'll remove it. Notice that I won't touch the "needed expansion" remarks on the various too-short sections. Renato ( talk) 10:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
y8i6uhndjkhyhew urdjh fnhy rfy hbreheryoe fhjhwehft jhahrffrgtbuyswqb73hbec jy7 fu7asebfuerty34hv5bhhjhfd y rnmbuyfeb xz5tqwhbnreyf 754 hìqdsmh sgds 7uwbwghvè'wedva0medybwydcmlònwr —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.52.72.199 ( talk) 12:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't care whether Roxy being a part of Winx or not. But, we should watch the latest contributions from a user named Coolak. Some of his/her contribution is, maybe, good. But I don't like how (s)he changed Template:Winx Club; it's a copy of that on the Italian Wikipedia. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 16:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
P.S. you should use "he" at the reference to me Coolak ( talk) 06:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
It's okay now, user AeronPeryton has changed the template according to rules. -- Coolak ( talk) 16:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
More than a month ago, I started a topic on the contributions from a user named Coolak. But, no one except the user himself has answered.
So, I want to hear from you, with following issues:
-- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 05:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
What don't you like in my contribution? Speaking about Roxy, I have explained all here (Both grey and green blocks). -- Coolak ( talk) 08:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
For those who still think Musa being a Princess, she's really not. In fact, Musa introduced herself as a Princess, but only heard in the 4Kids' version of S1 ep3 ("Save the First Dance" in that version). In the original versions (both Italian language version and Cinelume's English dub) of the episode ("L’anello di Stella"/"Alfea College for Fairies" in those versions), she didn't say so.
Her status is revealed in S2 ep15, where Musa is being introduced as a girl from an ordinary family (and her mother was passed away). This is a might-be-an-intended-continuity-conflict made by the original production company Rainbow S.p.A.. Anyway, will you still believe "Musa is a Princess"? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
The title of the second film or we could say movie is winx club in a magical adventure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.31.215 ( talk) 17:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I was scrolling through the article to check if any new info was added and I saw this:
"Pixies The Pixie Teens are the Older, taller, and more magical forms of the mini pixies Darla: The Pixie of Crafts. She is an exquisite crafter and artist born on Planet Craftia. Among her friends,she is the most daring and adventurous. During the series, she is an ultimate enemy of Darcy. And she has been an enemy of Flo Fireheart, on count Flo makes fun of Darla. Once in the series, they battle on earth. Carissa: The Pixie of Love. She is a similar female form of Cupid born on planet Romance. Among her buddies, she is the most dramatic and unbelieveable. She is an enemy of Stormy. And she is a fashionista. Marisol: Pixie of Weather. She is the sweetest among her BFF's. Born on planet Wisteria. She is claimed to be an ultimate enemy of stormy and Marisol often argues with Carissa. Julie: Pixie of Myths. She is the smartest among the group from Planet Mythologica. Julie is a big-hearted friend. She is often creative and always has a way to keep the girls out of chaos and trouble. Amber: Pixie of Balance. She is the kindest and nicest member of the group. Her and Julie get along the best. She is very creative and loves yoga and being in a peaceful way. She is from planet Pyrro and is claimed to be a vegetarian."
Um? What is this? If this is Pop Pixie, then it belongs in a Pop Pixie article. But I've never seen these mentioned in Pop Pixie at all. I'm thinking someone used this as a chance to get their fanfic characters on Wikipedia maybe? But if these are real, can we get some proof? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.114.201 ( talk) 22:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Bloom and her five best friends Stella, Flora, Tecna, Musa and Layla/Aisha, and is situated mainly in the Magical Dimension and on Earth. This sentence makes no gramatical sense. Since it is the first sentence of the second paragraph in the lead, it is essential it be written in clearly understood English. It reads as though some words have gone missing. What about the five friends? Why is one name written Layla/Aisha? Layla (later known as Aisha) is more easily understood. Also , and is not great structring either. Either have the and or the comma, not both. Please fix. -- Falcadore ( talk) 01:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Does it really belong here thought it got a source. mich ( talk) 01:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I just did some rather extensive copy edits on the article. I've never heard of this show before, so it might be a good idea for someone to look over my work in case I messed up. There were a few places where the run-on sentences were just so confusing that I had make a judgment call on what exactly they were trying to say. There were also a couple cases of rather ambiguous use of pronouns; it wasn't obvious to whom they were referring. I used context to try to solve the mystery, but I may have guessed wrong. I think I fixed the worst of the grammar, spelling, and style errors, but it wouldn't hurt to contact the Guild of Copy Editors. This article still needs more work. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 06:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This actress is so unimportant to this article that she is not even mentioned in this article. I have removed the addition of template:Ariana Grande when it has been added as there is absolutely no value with some random actress navbox for anyone reading this article. Before it is put back please give some real good reason why any reader of this article would find this of any value. As it stands it just adds detritus to the end of this article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 22:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
See also WP:NAVBOX: "2. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article" and "3. The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent." -- Geraldo Perez ( talk) 23:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I removed the transformations section because I thought it was unnecessary, excessive in-universe info, but it was reverted because apparently it's "important". I don't see it this way at all (who cares about their outfits?), but I'm always a bit insecure about my edits, so I thought I'd bring this up on the talk page. Was I right to remove the whole section? WonderBuono! ( talk) 03:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
No, you weren't right 87.161.201.56 ( talk) 07:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes they are not important. They must be removed. 87 give a valid reason for reverting edits except that "You weren't right". 197.224.93.232 ( talk) 10:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
So there's a non-notable band that might be named after the show. This is trivial unless and until the band is notable and independent reliable sources discuss the band's connection to the show.
By way of comparison, a friend of mine had a band in college named after a planet in a well-known scifi movie. That band does not belong in the article about the movie either. - SummerPhD ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing the movies from the "Plot" section. The movies are part of the plot and their events must be included in the "Plot" section. 197.224.93.232 ( talk) 10:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Why is someone constantly removing the movies' plots? The movies plots are officially part of the series' plot and it was officially confirmed by the creators of the series. 197.224.69.105 ( talk) 20:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Here is the evidence that the movies are part of the series:
This is enough evidence that the movies are part of the plot and that your arguments are invalid. 197.225.197.91 ( talk) 10:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
You are, and Im first time on wiki, so dont tell lies... But just by the way the police is looking for you know,for trolling. They were the same meaning that you are trolling, cause they have seen your edits... You can call them if you dont believe me ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.146.200.228 ( talk) 20:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
The Winx Club films are not part of the television series, as they were released theatrically. Even though the plot of the movies is referenced in the series, they are not the same. The films are their own separate works based on the television series. They just happen to (mostly) follow the same continuity. WonderBuono! ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Where we can discuss its inclusion into this article. Tutelary ( talk) 15:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Future plot shouldnt stay there, also the newspaper Arent an official source cause they wrote sometime wrong plots. Also the plot of season6 was first post after it's aired. So it should be like season 7. Cause we dont know if the source is 100% offical HoseofLove ( talk) 15:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Future thing will be romve on other pages as well and its better. So it should be here as well. This site should be for everyone not only for your edis.. Look at the edit war yesterday HoseofLove ( talk) 15:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Do you get my argument? The site is for everonye and on the official winx club site is nothing of the plot of season 7. So the newspaper isnt an official source. But okay if you think so.. Everyone seems to hate me, tells lie about me, cause I have another opinion... Fine. HoseofLove ( talk) 15:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
It has been officially announced that a seventh season of Winx Club will be produced, slated for 2015. An official teaser summary of the season states that: "Each fairy will have an animal that has a special talent, necessary for the balance of the Magic Universe. The Winx will discover this, while facing two new dreadful villains and getting new transformations along their journey." [1] [2]
The second reference here is hidden behind a paywall.
The article you have selected requires a WorldScreen.com premium subscription.
Become a Member Now!
Subscription is just $99 for one whole year.
— nyuszika7h ( talk) 19:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
And here are the references:
References
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I have flagged the table at Winx Club#Cast and characters as being original research. Deciding on a season-by-season basis who is a main character and who the recurring or guest characters are seems to rely heavily on personal interpretation. Anyone have any sources? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Sigismondi, Paolo (1 June 2015). "The Winx Club phenomenon in the global animation landscape". Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies. 3 (3): 271–285. doi: 10.1386/jicms.3.3.271_1. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 00:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international Winx Club voice actors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international Winx Club voice actors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
On the 4Kids dub of the series, there are multiple claims to who voices Stella and Darcy.
Stella:
Darcy:
The closing credits for 4Kids do not specify the roles, but Caren Manuel is listed among the Lead voices, whereas Birnbaum and Delaney are not listed. Birnbaum is listed among the DVD listing for Netflix: "Liza Jacqueline, Amy Birnbaum, Lisa Ortiz, Kerry Williams, Gregory Abbey, Dan Green, Michael Sinterniklaas, Caren Manuel, Suzy Myers, Christina Rodriguez, Dani Schaffel, Sebastian Arcelus, Rachael Lillis" HERE and so is Caren Manuel, but the online version Netflix Watch Instantly pertains to the RAI English version which has a completely different cast list. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
I mean why wikipedia first mention it Christina rodriguez and Amy Birnbaum? They not listed! How they make this mistake!?-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 20:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Winx Club WOW: World of Winx is still showing on Netflix as Coming Spring 2016. [3] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, my other question is "Why Liza Kaplan's article is redirect\contribut to Fox cast?". First we only had info about her voice career on fox! But later AngusWoof found a old page about her! And I know now that she is stopped bu fox! And works on and for philomel books! And but why she stopped!? Can anyone write a bio for her! Links\Refrence are mention it on her draft page!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 16:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anyone known why 4Kids don't mention it roles for the voice actors? But only names on the credits?! As for the vg they aren't mention it the names! Selfs from the voice actors not!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 21:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
I moved this section to the talk page as there isn't a proper Reception section to handle this, and it's a country-specific reception issue for a show that was broadcast there many years after the original version: AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 07:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
On 15 June 2017, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) imposed a fine of Rs. 500,000 (US$ 4,772) on Nikelodeon, over the episode "The Emperor's Throne" of Winx Club in which a female cartoon character was allegedly shown indecently dressed. After airing of the content, PEMRA issued a show cause notice to the channel to explain its position and after hearing the channel's representative it was found that the channel had violated multiple clauses of the Pakistan's Electronic Media Code of Conduct 2015. [1]
This could be revisited when the Reception is listed out for multiple countries especially the primary countries of broadcast. But for now see WP:CRIT and WP:WEIGHT doesn't justify it. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 07:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC) update 12:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
References
Hi, anyone have a proof that Haven is Darcy, Saskia is Stormy en Eilrrn is Lockette? Only saw at pokemon winx wiki and imdb! But i don't trust thata show real proof-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 14:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, why 4kids don't show the characters for the voice actors??? Very stupid is that!! Now we don't know who us Stella. If Caren don't saying Stella!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 18:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 17:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Winx Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
This series does not use star and recurring / guest star billing for their voice actors or characters so having one would be original research and not helpful. Please do not insert such a table in this article or the characters list. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
I've been WP:BOLD and removed two repetitive sections that go against the Manual of Style. Before my edit, there were two sections of intricate detail that did not belong on the main article. First, "Plot" listed paragraphs of individual seasons' plots, which belong on the separate season pages and not this one. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Plot section, the plot given on the main article should only "summarize the core storyline," which a section ("Premise") already does. Second, there was a very long IMDb-style list of unoriginal voice actors on the main article for the dubs (only English, no other dubs). The section under "Development" about the cast seems to cover the notable voice actors of the show without turning into a list of dub voices, which if at all, should go on the List of Winx Club characters page under their roles. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Cast and characters information says that cast sections need to be written "without simply re-iterating entertainment websites such as IMDb," which is exactly what the dub voice list was. Hammill Ten ( talk) 22:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello guys. I am the person who pushed the Russian Winx Club article to the featured status. I'm glad to see that someone is trying to make the English article look better too. I've skimmed through it, and I've come across this phrase that I don't like: "Roxy, the fairy of animals, occasionally joins the Winx and all three of the show's production companies refer to her as the Winx Club's seventh member". It definitely is not valuable information for the article and looks to me like a Roxy fan's attempt to make a point to everybody who doesn't think she's a Winx Club member. The sources provided merely quote a DVD cover and a couple of synopses, and we all know that those are written not by the creators but by promoters who often don't have a clue about the story. At the same time, even on the official website there's just six pages that represent Winx Club members: Bloom, Stella, Flora, Musa, Aisha, Tecna. If Roxy was a Winx Club member, there would definitely be a page devoted to her on the official website, provided that it's been 10 years since she "joined the club" as some fans think. But there's not. And the only reliable source confirming she's a member would only be an official interview or a direct statement from the creators and not from DVD covers/synopses. But even despite that, I will repeat: it's not the kind of information for Wikipedia. We as well could quote everything from DVD covers and promotional materials, but we don't do so, so why is this particular case with Roxy in any way important? Let fans have their own opinions regarding something that's not officially confirmed or disproved. And that statement from the article is merely a singe fan's attempt to make their opinion look "official". If there's no reasoned objections within a week, I'm removing that. Coolak ( talk) 14:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
The statement that "it is clear from the very cartoon" is original research, as the official supplemental materials explain Roxy's role in the cartoon in very clear terms ("a seventh fairy ... Roxy will join the Winx group"). Even if she does not appear as much as the other six anymore, she was introduced as the seventh member to join, as confirmed by the producers and the production companies before/during the fourth season. The references I've provided are first-party sources directly from the companies involved with the show; third-party references from news agencies also reported this same exact information (" Roxy, the new character who will become part of the close-knit Winx group"). You said "not every piece of info needs to be included," but this information is necessary to the paragraph as it is listing the members of the Winx. To exclude the character who is blatantly called the seventh fairy on the team would be incorrect. I'm sorry, but this conversation has gone nowhere. Opinionated original research doesn't override the many official sources. I can reiterate the additional sources I've given above if you need. Lagoona Blue ( talk) 19:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I noticed an addition, saying the Winx website "refers to Roxy as to a person separate from the Club" was added without discussion. The source referenced doesn't do this; it's a plot summary of a season 4 episode that highlights Roxy separately from the other Winx, saying "Roxy and the Winx"...the same exact wording is used for Bloom, who is also a Winx ( "Bloom and the Winx" on Season 6 story, page 8). I'll be removing the new content as it pretty clearly misrepresents the sources (we aren't going to say that "Bloom is a person separate from the Club" because of the website's exact same choice of words). Lagoona Blue ( talk) 19:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
The eighth season is not a reboot. If it was, the continuity from the previous seven seasons would be ignored. The cited source doesn't even say anything about a reboot, only that the series was targeting a younger audience and that the Netflix series would cater to older fans. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 11:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
A retool just means the production is being revamped in a way that doesn't affect show in-universe. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 22:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bloom (winx club charector). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Restored information on the show's original broadcast via 4Kids Entertainment and 4Kids TV. Nickelodeon wouldn't begin co-producing the series until season 5, and even then, Viacom (2005–2019) wouldn't acquire 30% of Rainbow until 2011. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 00:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
if you see that the end date says present just know that is unsourced not only is that unsourced but if you go on edit source you can see next to the present it says yes so that person just wants winx club to be on in the present day now i dont know how to report but if you could tell me how to report that person that would be great — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingkobra775 ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
This features the same image that was on Wikia. Is this enough to prove that the image is real and not fan-made? https://www.winxcluball.com/2020/09/rainbow-srl-confirms-winx-club-season-9.html?m=1 79.100.210.106 ( talk) 05:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
What about this
http://imperoland.it/winx-club-torna-in-tv-14-febbraio/amp/ ? Does this count as a source?
109.160.111.223 (
talk)
20:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Does Channel Frederator count as a source? They also mentioned an upcoming Season 9 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlU9YfZlpcg 85.187.109.112 ( talk) 22:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
With the release of the Netflix original live action series more and more people are interested in the animated version however the many iterations of the show can be very confusing for newcomers this is why there needs to be two different Wikipedia pages for winx club.
One for the original Italian series and another one for the revitalized series. Newcomers to the series tend to find this article very confusing as it has merged all iterations of the show together.
Separating the two series would help new fans of the show understand the difference between the original tween series and the more child friendly revitalized series. There are many differences between the two series . The original is targeted at tweens and teenagers and dwells into darker and psychological themes while the revitalized series that begun with nickelodeon caters to a more kid friendly audience.
Also the characters have different personalities and backstories in each version of the show.
The original series consists of the first 4 seasons and the first 2 movies. The revived series starts when Viacom purchased the series and nickelodeon joined the production team.
All in all I believe that separating the two series is vital for the proper information of the fandom. BrightSilver ( talk) 17:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, when the show was re-launched in 2011, it wasn’t totally different from the original episodes. There were the re-animated specials that retold seasons 1-2, but even those weren't a full reboot. Even if it’s confusing because of the changes over time, it’s still part of the same show. TheFallenPower ( talk) 19:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I agree that it should not be split, just because the tone was changed, it does not make it a different show. They would not call Season 5 "Season 5" if it was a new show, they would call it Season 1. 109.160.111.223 ( talk) 12:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
It amazes me that the people who edithog this page have no earthly clue how the television business works and yet even they know that this is a bad idea. Thecleanerand ( talk) 14:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
First off, the entire article comes across as a fan blog rather than an objective piece that's supposed to at least provide the basic information to the show. There are just too many instances of non-consequential information that the average reader doesn't need to know to understand the show, made even worse because the people who edit this article don't have a basic cue to how the television broadcast nor the the TV animation industry works. Never mind the fact some people need to be educated on the difference between reboots and revivals, the fact that they mistook 4Kids Entertainment as a network rather than a production and entertainment company (one that did a localized dub of the show long before it became a Nickelodeon co-production that, for whatever reason, the editor decided to ignore) clearly shows how clueless they are. Finally, on top of all the pointless trivia, there are multiple instances of generic press quotes used throughout the page.
Do you know how frustrating it is for people who don't know what they're talking about and have no business editing any article relating to the business of television and media to reverse the edits of the people who do? Thecleanerand ( talk) 14:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Barebones nothing! The opening did summarize the article with the basic information without the need of paragraphs. Don't base your argument by comparing one bad article on this website to another! There were zero changes regarding the information about the show being retooled for a preschool audience, while the entry about the budget cuts to their "most expensive show" (non-neutral fanspeak) were deliberately blamed on Gladiators of Rome. Furthermore "additional context" IS pointless trivia, because the average reader doesn't need to know about it! And what is this backhanded talk about information that shouldn't be left out, when no one wants to address the fact that 4Kids did a localized dub long before Winx became a co-production. Thecleanerand ( talk) 04:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Again, don't base your argument by comparing one article on this website to another. I'm not arguing the need to explain the budget cuts and the production changes because those are explained in the actual article. The summary at the top of the page does not need four paragraphs to do what the article itself explains. Your opinion is to waste the average readers time with pointlness fluff and a non-neutral POV for the sake of Winx fans; this is not a fansite and this article shouldn't cater to them. "the 4Kids TV airings and dub are still mentioned"...in the context that 4Kids is a TV network that edited the show for its context rather than a licensing and production company that created their own localized version of the show (no different to Saban Entertainment) for broadcast on a block they produced for another network; the network in question, Fox Broadcasting Company, wasn't even mentioned. That section will only turn into "a long list of foreign dubs" if you assume every dub was done the same way. Anyone with common sense (ie, clearly not you) will know that straightforward dubs (non-localized, no editing) have been produced for the show; those dubs don't need to be mentioned unless other wise. Also, "the American purchase" wasn't "the original version" either, obviously that was the Italian broadcast. Nevermind the edits Nickelodeon's dub did for seasons 3 and 4 in order to tie them into the later seasons co-produced with Rainbow as part of the revival seasons. Thecleanerand ( talk) 12:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Thecleanerand, please stop edit warring without getting consensus for your deletions... Also, please read the note: "This section is for the original casts, not for dubs. Seasons 1-4 were animated to match the Italian voices, while 5-6 and the specials were done to match the Hollywood voices. Any third-party dubs, including 4Kids, are not original and do not belong in this section." There were other dubs that "created their own localized version of the show" too, like the German dub that had a completely new opening song and edits, but these are not the original casts. The original was just the Italian version for 2004-2009, then after the show became Italian-American, the page can start to mention that American information. TheFallenPower ( talk) 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
The German dub wasn't a localization; all it did was change the opening, not the actual content of the show. How can I get a consensus from people who don't have a clue nor care to get one? The fact that you people don't even know the difference between a straight dub and a localization (a la 4Kids or Saban) clearly shows you don't have the right to judge. I'm not edit warring, everyone else is treating this website like their own personal blog without any consideration for anyone else. Thecleanerand ( talk) 17:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Why voice actor section is deleted a long time ago? NiesNi ( talk) 19:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Since it is now clearly said to be a reboot series as the sneak peek calls it a brand new series rather than Season 9 (Season 9 is what it was originally said to be back when it was first announced in late 2020. They later said it is a reboot in late 2021 and have been calling it a reboot since but at the time it wasn't 100% clear that it was really a reboot series and not just another soft reboot), shouldn't we make a separate Winx Club (2025 TV series) page? 91.92.103.87 ( talk) 09:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Winx Club article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about reviews, fan opinions, or other forum-like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about reviews, fan opinions, or other forum-like topics at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Layla/Aisha is really only a feminist in the 4kids versions; she is actually quite shy and submissive in the original version. I tried to put something explaining that in her character guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.249.69 ( talk) 00:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
That is most definitely wrong, you might be following the 4kids version there, they become guardian fairies of the magic dimension, not queens! Winxrocker ( talk) 10:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I have the first batch of English titles for "Winx Club". I needs to be formatted, if you please. User:NoseNuggets 08:25 PM EDT 05/26/05.
I would like if I get help, or at the least a "OK" from the major contributors of the article, to rewrite the article into two distinct catagories to properly explain the first and second seasons. It is my opinion that article is messy, with overlapping information/spoilers and US/italian conversions making it worse.--
Kevin586 19:31, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
I ahppen to like to piolers. Just put a Spoliers warnning on there and let people decide for themselves. THe article isnt that messy. THe only part that needs cleaning is the hamburgeress TRIX ( 69.150.74.114 21:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC))
Which name is correct?
I never saw the original edition (I only saw the 4KIDS TV edition, so I think it's Mariam. or Miriam. Or... well. it's the M at the end. But I'm not really sure. --Addict 2006 17:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC) The original Italian version gives their names as Marion and Oritel. Marian in Italian is pronounced Maariion, which would sound a bit odd in English, so they changed her name to Miriam in the 4kids edition Winxrocker ( talk) 10:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC) Her true name is Marion ([User talk: WinxfulLight]) 12:27, 30 July 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.162.76.18 ( talk)
I heard about this reference several times but I never seen any actual evidence that she is infused with any cyberneticss. Can someone point me to any Winx Club comic or animated series episode that assert she is half-machine?-- Kevin586 19:10, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
In the booklet that came with the 1st two DVDs released in Australia it says in the section about Tecna "Others: She is half android".
In one episode when Tecna cries she says "I didn't know I could cry" which could mean shes a cyborg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.82.192 ( talk) 15:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I think it would be helpful if we just looked at bare facts instead of inferences. Does anyone have information from the official website or a line from the original Italian version which proves she's an android or cyborg? Cailunet rawr 03:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
For the Australian DVD, I think it's an error made by 4Kids may be? I can tell you, at least, she's not any kind of robot. I can't just clarify whether she is either human or alien because the mail characters are came from outer space... -- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 07:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Tecna is not a cyborg. Cyborgs are robots, they have no magic powers. Also, cyborgs can't show feelings but Tecna is able to show happiness, angry and sadness. Besides, most of the so-called facts on fan fiction are made up. There is no information on the official website that says she is a machine or half of one. Let's face the facts. The creators never mentioned s until they do this idea is impossible.
Does the Italian vs. English diffrences belong here? The series is broadcasted in other languages, where there are yet other names for places etc.
In my opinion, Winx is the compound word of Minx and Wink 성혀니
Should the content the Icy, Stormy, and Darcy be integerated in the primary Winx club article? list your vote supporting or opposing with optional explaination.
for the edits section why are people promoting their own sites and agendas?
Hey the article is already over the limit size of 32kb, right? So why no one has see it and do something about it. Dial-Up user has a hard time to load this page
On other Winx Club websites I saw that there will be third season of Winx Club with 2 new Winx girls. I really couldn't understand when it was going to air because they spoke spanish. ---These are bad rumors that have been copied from site to site all summer long.
The Third season has been announced on 4kids TV, but there isn't any info on the 2 new Winx girls yet. User:Coconutfred73
I hate to say this but the third season is already over. There are no new winx girls, the villian is called Valtor and all six girls have a form called Enchantix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.10.247 ( talk) 10:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
the sections that are long shoud be placed in their own articles, then the Winx Club others article could be re-merged into the main article. -- Cartoonborg 22:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The question before us is simple as it difficult: should the major editors merge Winx Club and Winx Club Others? List Oppose or support with an explaination, if you like.
Support if certain conditions are met - The current Winx Club article is serious need of pruning and editing to accomidate the possible merge. First and formost, the current winx club article should be abot the television program as opposed to its current "universe"-like definition. What I suggest is eliminating most of the character entries of characters who only appeared once and/or do not contribute the major story of the series. The "monsters" section should also eliminated.-- Kenn Caesius 20:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
SUPPORT The article were split for some reason related to the legnth of the complete article. Therefore the minor charachers could be put in one article with the title "minor characers in winx club" Also the sections could be moved in to seprate articles as I sugested aboue. --
Cartoonborg
17:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
SUPPORT Here's a little suggestion - why not have shorter introductory paragraphs linking to seperate main articles for the major characters, including pictures, character bios, list of magical abiites etc? That way a bit of space could be saved on the main page AND the characters could be covered in more detail.
Nisa Tunesque
08:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Having worked the article for Bloom for the past few days, I have about a situation that all editors should consider: How to adress the discrepancies across the different versions of the winx club. Doing some quick reseach for the bloom article, bloom has about three different birthdays and the spelling of her homeplanet different. There is no doubt that as the editing continues we will continue to find more. To address in the artcle this, I would recommend the following
Citing the controversy of the editing and censoring done by 4kids Entertainment in the north american version of the winx club, I do not consider it accurate an source or representation of the original italian version. In the bloom article I have been creating, I retrieved most the information and spelling from wwww.winxclub.com and not www.winxclub.tv, a 4kids entertainment website. The .com is supported by the production company that created the series.
With this in mind, I would suggest that future editors try to verify the appropriate information against the .com website. Please keep any questions or comments in this discussion page.-- Kenn Caesius 17:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi! My name's K-9 LVR, I'm a big fan of Winx Club, and I've decided to set up some recaps for the episodes! It's really fun, but Season 1 is also kind of hard, because it's been a while, and I'm going from memory. Anyone can chip in if they want to, and they know I've missed something; I won't mind! -- K-9 LVR 00:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Its quite a ambitious project you have decided to undertake however I am not at all sure about spending the time and effort in creating individual episode articles in light the of the current problems with the main winx club article.
On the subject of how to best list the episodes of the winx club, for the time being I would suggest a listing like the List of South Park episodes but without the links to every episode: there are just not enough editors knowledgeable or dedicated enough to create and maintain them (yet). As always, if anyone thinks they have a better idea, we should have discussion and vote on it.-- Kenn Caesius 19:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I was going to bring this up this weekend but in light of Malkinann edits and suggestions, now is the time dicuss such matters before anymore major changes occur.
First off, I would like like say that I really like the direction that malkinann is taking this article and in support of her suggestions to create the new article List of minor Winx Club characters.
However, this is only the beginning. As I was about to purpose this weekend, this article in need of more splits because the article has become too long, very unorganized, and the ubiquitous "Places, Location, and Characters" is doing more than it should. To adress this, I would like to suggest following article names:
List of minor Winx Club locations
Within the main article itself, I feel that less is more and suggest consolidating characters into simpler subcatagories such as this proposed outline:
Main Characters
Supporting Characters
Broadacasting
Other media
Ultimately, talk is cheap. I would like to hear from other editors regarding how to proceded with this article.-- Kenn Caesius 19:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, I've been bold, and gotten rid of most of the character information from the main article and created the minor characters list. Once the List of minor Winx Club characters is cleaned up a little, maybe we could consider spinning out The Specialists and the Pixies into their own articles, like The Specialists (Winx Club) and Pixies (Winx Club)? I didn't want to link to any Specialists or Pixies just atm, because of this possibility. I'd agree that some of the *very* minor fairies perhaps don't need wiki space, but I'd rather leave that to someone else's judgement. On the bright side, both the new list and the main article are under the long-page limit! :)
If you're not sure if the monsters of the day are notable, then maybe they should go in episode summaries/articles? What I was thinking of doing with the Winx Club Other article was merging in the merchandise and links to the main page, and then renaming the page Winx Club (English versions), or Winx Club (controversy), and then we can use that article to complain about the dubs' editing etc. as well as the inevitable-seeming accusations of witchcraft. - Malkinann 00:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
It has been a incredible week of shuffling, editing, and moving content now I would like to ask all those that have contributed: Do you like the main winx club article as it is?
Far be it for me to say we are finished but with the article refitted and finally allowed to expand, what more can be added and changed (apart from the "realm of magix" section and the feature film section) that cannot be integrate with the with the "season", "minor characters", and character biography articles? There is additional work to be done in those articles but now we have finally have space and direction to get it right.-- Kenn Caesius 16:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It looks a lot better than it was. We need to think about what we're going to do with the rest of the Winx Club Others article, and get a proper logo up in the TV box. Was the only section that was deleted outright the " Monsters" section? - Malkinann 02:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Just checking that the Monsters section was all that ended up deleted. :) I think we've done good! - Malkinann 04:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I have removed one hopeless entry because I could not rewrite to make any sense have editted the rest so that they would. However, I seriously considering deleting them soon: me reason for doing so is most the "edits" mentioned are neglible and would perhaps fall under the catagory of localization, which simply cannot be helped in international releases
The other reason I will considering removing the content is because the reliability is questionaable. The removed entry refering to changes in "Miss Magix" seems to describe the episode as it aired under the 4Kids TV banner.
Finally some of this content would be best included in episode summeries as per my suggestion in the hidden comments. Unless some disagrees, I will ultimately remove all edits within the next week.-- Kenn Caesius 18:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
In season 3, there is a new bay guy but the name is still a mystery eventhough 4Kids already air it and name him ""Baltor"" but on Winx Club offical website him name is called ""Valtor""
I think it's valtor. the website says so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I think there is enough information of the plot to mention it briefly in the main article and go into detail in a article of its own with one of those "television program in progress" tags. Would anyone disagree?-- Kenn Caesius 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I think it's Valtor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Here http://www.winxclubontour.com/ there seems to be a Winx Club musical in Italy that is touring the Netherlands. Does anyone know more about it, or can they understand the site? - Malkinann 23:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I've found this toy, an automatic peer review suggestions bot, and I ran it through the Winx Club article. The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Malkinann 07:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the "Winx Club - Cut It Out!" link even allowed to stay on? It just got removed. -- Addict 2006 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I seriously doubt spin-offs relating to Stell and Trix are true. I have conducted informal research using the the search string "winx club +spin-off" on google and yahoo! searches about the closest those words get together is during a discussion of fan fiction. I say that if no source is provided by the end of this month, the entire section should be removed.-- Kevin586 18:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I thought it was suspicious. Just remove it or something. or maybe I'd speedy tag it right now. -- Addict 2006 16:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
But I think that history will absolve me. I have gone ahead and created the new season three article as the section was becoming too large and with new episode of the series premiering weekly now, it is only bound to get larger. I will update the to-do list next to removed its mention and request that future editors focus thier attention on copyediting the content of all winx club articles.-- Kevin586 18:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Going the official website just posted by an editor, I have noticed some discrepancy of the title: according to the italian text on the bottom is its winx club - il segrete de regno perduto which (off the top of my head ) translates into "secret of the lost king". However, when the preview is over, its simply winx club il film. Can someone suggest how to deal with this?-- Kevin586 06:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, this may well be a teaser trailer. This situation might be in a different country/area, but the third Pokemon movie suffered a name change as well (right after a teaser trailer came out). -- Addict 2006 03:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The Finalised name is "Winx Club: Secret of the lost kingdom" which is supposed to succeed the third season where the girls help Bloom find out about her true parent, also with the help of a man named Haggen who once knew Bloom's parents , King Oritel and Queen Marion. -- User: WinxfulLight 12:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.162.76.18 ( talk)
They have just released volume 3 of season two a little whille ago , just though you might like to know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.184.174.220 ( talk) 06:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
I have reviewed most the of the unofficial links and nearly all of them are poorly made fansites with no useful information. Unless someone can justify their inclusion in this article, I will be removing them by the Tuesday, May 8th.-- Kevin586 18:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I have hidden the entire section regarding localization and versions out of concern to that of the content is unsourced and perhaps may not be suitable for this english language version of this article.
Regarding claims that the series has edited, can someone cite credible sources (by wikipedia's standards) that there are distinct versions? While I believe these claims, I think there has been some confusion over localization and distinct versions. It has been my stance from my early involvement with this article to leave the localization content with the respective foriegn language article.
Another reason, I have eliminated the section to avoid encouraging the fancruft from creating one giant uncited wall of text of edits. If someone can cite a edit (in the series) I say it should be moved the season articles, character articles, or stay, if it effects the entire series.-- Kevin586 18:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
i'd like to say that Kevin 586 has convinced me. the comments i wrote on changes in story due to the fact commercials are longer in america was just something i felt should be said. now however i see that specific information should be placed in character, episode, or a "differences" article(s). However i still stand by that this article should still state that there are 2 english dubbed versions of the shows to clear up confusion in other english speaking countries and explain why there are differences.
I've assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of important sections like critical response, production etc. and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. These categories are arbritrary and are subject to review by any editor who feels confident to do so.
I think the article really needs a response section. Has the show ever won an award? Has it ever been reviewed by a television critic? What are the ratings figures like? It would also benefit from a production section detailing the crew, animators, how the show is made, how it was conceived etc. At the moment the article is all plot and characters and there is very little out of universe perspective given.
There is information in the lead that is not part of the main article - the lead should be a summary of the content of the main article. See WP:Lead for advice on constructing the lead of the article.
Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.-- Opark 77 09:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
it says on floras page that 4kids changed her planets name, but in the season 3 lucy went 2 baltor and told him that they were going to linyphea, not wat they changed it 2, CONFUSION did they change the name? Joseph mitchell9 23:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Please translate Japanese!! 221.79.35.16 ( talk) 10:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
He probably thinks Winx Club came from Japan. I swear, everytime America or any non-Japanese country has something good, people assume it's Japanese or a Japanese rip-off. CN Guy ( talk) 18:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
As requested I began some proofreading. I mainly fixed typos and adjusted bad grammar and style, as I am not very familiar with the contents of the series. I will remove the Style tag as soon as I am done, please let me know if you disagree. Also, I believe that the part about the Winx Musical should be moved to a separate article, or even removed completely. Is a musical only shown in Italy and Netherlands really worthy of more than a couple of lines, just for information? Are the names of the various actors/dancers worthy of inclusion? They simply elongate the article without reason in my opinion. Quatonik ( talk) 21:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh my tian, I'm getting soooo sick of those vandalism by many IP addresses! Its about time we semi-protect this article! >_< Agree? Tikal-chan ( talk) 14:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I was so surprised when I saw the article about the very first episode is titled " It Feels Like Magic" (4Kids version's title) while " An Unexpected Event" (Title used in the Rainbow's English dub) is a redirect to that article.
Then, two ideas quickly came to mind;
Which idea do you prefer?
When citing www.winxclub.com's English edition, I think we should be careful, as the edition seems currently for the UK where they get 4K's version.
I watched the episodes from the first to fifty second. However, I heard no mention of characters' birthdays, although two "official" sites mention two different dates per one character. How about this? In the infobox, data for birth date goes "Not mentioned during the TV series [1]" while the ref tag goes;
hi i'm posting this here and on the winx club disscusion page. why did you delete my section on Nabu on the main page. to me it only make sense to have him listed there as he is the boyfriend/fiancee. all the other girls boyfriends are listed there and still have more info on them under the List of minor Winx Club characters#The Specialists page. Inferno17 ( talk) 16:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
is there any news on the us release of the winx club The Secret of the Lost Kingdom movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.28.245 ( talk) 23:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, so I noticed some pages use Baltor (like the Template:Winx_Club and the Winx Club (season three), but others use Valtor, such as List of minor Winx Club characters and List of Winx Club episodes. Which one should we use? Matty-chan ( talk) 08:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Ummm, guys... please do not discuss the article's subject here. This is for discussion of the article and ways to improve it. We do not need to know that Winx Club is a hentai search term or that it ripped off W.I.T.C.H. because the main character has red hair and they're about girls learning magic. I cleaned up the talk page. Matty-chan ( talk) 08:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Based on the List of Naruto characters, new layout of character list page, to be named List of Winx Club characters, is under construction. It is located at User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/WC characters.
I will do my best for the layout. However, I need your help with the content. Therefore, you can improve the sandbox by adding content and gathering sources.
By the way, what should I do with the Redfountain specialists? Consider them as "protagonists" or "other characters"? -- JSH-alive (talk) (cntrbtns) (mail me) 12:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I keep seeing sections about this, but no sources. I've found fan-made videos on youtube, but no proof on the official site, in Italian or English. Should I just remove the unsourced information relating to the Elementix? Cailunet rawr 01:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
maybe we can have a character called Chelsea after the football team! She can be an Asian. She can have long, dark brown hair and is very skinny. Of couse she is beautiful. Her boyfriend can be a boy named Derek who has blonde hair and very handsome. He can also be the brother of Sky! she might have the power of the whole wide world and she is the princess of the Green Land. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.212.81.227 ( talk) 14:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Basically, 4kids vs. the original... Should we have some sort of guideline for whether which we use? And which one should we use? Cailunet rawr 02:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Yep. There's no official Japanese version yet. However, someone's adding incorrect role on the articles on the Japanese voice actresses. What should I do? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 06:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
There were still a lot of problems, I think they're fixed now. Here's a phrase I couldn't work in:
(even though the 4Kids version is shown in the UK, except Welsh language broadcaster S4C)
This may need its own separate sentence, I couldn't quite understand what was meant. A lot of work went into this article, and it's great the show has remained so popular - definitely notable, I think. If any further help is needed copyediting, you can contact me at my talk page.-- Levalley ( talk) 01:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
What I know is:
That's it. I wonder if those facts can be added to the end of Variations section, or not to put on anywhere of the article. But it should not be a seed for the revival of the old worldwide syndication section. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 08:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Go to Template:Winx Club to see what happened. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
OK. The template is semi-protected for one month. It's time to improve Template:Winx Club a better way. Any ideas? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to nominate this article for deletion. It requires more than eleven references, Amazon.com isn't a reliable source. This article needs expert help from editors of the WikiProject Television or the Television Portal. Wikipedia isn't a place where you can collect random information without reliable sources. An article that has less than 11 references and is categorized as B-class article is NOT NOTABLE!!! If no one responds on why we need to save this article, I'll put it up for deletion tomorrow. Electrode Light 10:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
NO DON'T. I like visiting this article. I don't care if it's B-class or has less than 11 references. At least say you'll make a new one, please. Pt018 ( talk) 11:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Pt018.
I have deleted the “transformation sequences” section from the article because the content is too specific to the general tone of the article and also taken removed the merge request for “Enchantix” and “Belivix” [sic] for the same reason. If anyone feels that his content should be included it should integrated the respective season or character articles.-- Kencaesi ( talk) 17:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
I tried to edit this article and I was told by User:JSH-alive that I messed up ; quoted
I wanted a structure of featured ones like The Simpsons and Tokyo Mew Mew. But you Carly messed up.
Now I don't know about you but I thought that an editor's goal is to improve an article into featured status but alas by judging the state of the article it nothing more than Start-class quality with B-class quantity of Low importance.
They're so many stub sections like Production and development, Conception, Albums and soundtracks with two of those sections containing nothing but a template encouraging contributors to expand the section with un-referenced statements. I don't about any of you but I'm tired of seeing the Variations section having no references at all. I tried to fix the article but I was bashed for removing all unsourced material, special thanks to JSH-alive for putting back all the nonsense in the page.
I suggest that User:JSH-alive reads Wikipedia:Writing better articles, Wikipedia:Article size, Wikipedia:Summary style, Wikipedia:Check your facts, Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words, Wikipedia:The perfect article. The fine print should be either delete all the un sourced material or do some research. I would help but I've been discouraged from editing this article. Greene Leigh Online ( talk) 11:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
/// FGSFDS —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
91.50.78.6 (
talk)
21:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
The article bears a frame saying:
I wonder if these remarks are still relevant; the article has now various references (including in third-party publications), the style seems fine, and seems clean. Let me know what are the reasons for the article still to bear this criticism; otherwise I'll remove it. Notice that I won't touch the "needed expansion" remarks on the various too-short sections. Renato ( talk) 10:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
y8i6uhndjkhyhew urdjh fnhy rfy hbreheryoe fhjhwehft jhahrffrgtbuyswqb73hbec jy7 fu7asebfuerty34hv5bhhjhfd y rnmbuyfeb xz5tqwhbnreyf 754 hìqdsmh sgds 7uwbwghvè'wedva0medybwydcmlònwr —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.52.72.199 ( talk) 12:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't care whether Roxy being a part of Winx or not. But, we should watch the latest contributions from a user named Coolak. Some of his/her contribution is, maybe, good. But I don't like how (s)he changed Template:Winx Club; it's a copy of that on the Italian Wikipedia. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 16:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
P.S. you should use "he" at the reference to me Coolak ( talk) 06:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
It's okay now, user AeronPeryton has changed the template according to rules. -- Coolak ( talk) 16:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
More than a month ago, I started a topic on the contributions from a user named Coolak. But, no one except the user himself has answered.
So, I want to hear from you, with following issues:
-- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 05:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
What don't you like in my contribution? Speaking about Roxy, I have explained all here (Both grey and green blocks). -- Coolak ( talk) 08:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
For those who still think Musa being a Princess, she's really not. In fact, Musa introduced herself as a Princess, but only heard in the 4Kids' version of S1 ep3 ("Save the First Dance" in that version). In the original versions (both Italian language version and Cinelume's English dub) of the episode ("L’anello di Stella"/"Alfea College for Fairies" in those versions), she didn't say so.
Her status is revealed in S2 ep15, where Musa is being introduced as a girl from an ordinary family (and her mother was passed away). This is a might-be-an-intended-continuity-conflict made by the original production company Rainbow S.p.A.. Anyway, will you still believe "Musa is a Princess"? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
The title of the second film or we could say movie is winx club in a magical adventure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.31.215 ( talk) 17:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I was scrolling through the article to check if any new info was added and I saw this:
"Pixies The Pixie Teens are the Older, taller, and more magical forms of the mini pixies Darla: The Pixie of Crafts. She is an exquisite crafter and artist born on Planet Craftia. Among her friends,she is the most daring and adventurous. During the series, she is an ultimate enemy of Darcy. And she has been an enemy of Flo Fireheart, on count Flo makes fun of Darla. Once in the series, they battle on earth. Carissa: The Pixie of Love. She is a similar female form of Cupid born on planet Romance. Among her buddies, she is the most dramatic and unbelieveable. She is an enemy of Stormy. And she is a fashionista. Marisol: Pixie of Weather. She is the sweetest among her BFF's. Born on planet Wisteria. She is claimed to be an ultimate enemy of stormy and Marisol often argues with Carissa. Julie: Pixie of Myths. She is the smartest among the group from Planet Mythologica. Julie is a big-hearted friend. She is often creative and always has a way to keep the girls out of chaos and trouble. Amber: Pixie of Balance. She is the kindest and nicest member of the group. Her and Julie get along the best. She is very creative and loves yoga and being in a peaceful way. She is from planet Pyrro and is claimed to be a vegetarian."
Um? What is this? If this is Pop Pixie, then it belongs in a Pop Pixie article. But I've never seen these mentioned in Pop Pixie at all. I'm thinking someone used this as a chance to get their fanfic characters on Wikipedia maybe? But if these are real, can we get some proof? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.114.201 ( talk) 22:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Bloom and her five best friends Stella, Flora, Tecna, Musa and Layla/Aisha, and is situated mainly in the Magical Dimension and on Earth. This sentence makes no gramatical sense. Since it is the first sentence of the second paragraph in the lead, it is essential it be written in clearly understood English. It reads as though some words have gone missing. What about the five friends? Why is one name written Layla/Aisha? Layla (later known as Aisha) is more easily understood. Also , and is not great structring either. Either have the and or the comma, not both. Please fix. -- Falcadore ( talk) 01:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Does it really belong here thought it got a source. mich ( talk) 01:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I just did some rather extensive copy edits on the article. I've never heard of this show before, so it might be a good idea for someone to look over my work in case I messed up. There were a few places where the run-on sentences were just so confusing that I had make a judgment call on what exactly they were trying to say. There were also a couple cases of rather ambiguous use of pronouns; it wasn't obvious to whom they were referring. I used context to try to solve the mystery, but I may have guessed wrong. I think I fixed the worst of the grammar, spelling, and style errors, but it wouldn't hurt to contact the Guild of Copy Editors. This article still needs more work. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 06:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This actress is so unimportant to this article that she is not even mentioned in this article. I have removed the addition of template:Ariana Grande when it has been added as there is absolutely no value with some random actress navbox for anyone reading this article. Before it is put back please give some real good reason why any reader of this article would find this of any value. As it stands it just adds detritus to the end of this article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 22:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
See also WP:NAVBOX: "2. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article" and "3. The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent." -- Geraldo Perez ( talk) 23:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I removed the transformations section because I thought it was unnecessary, excessive in-universe info, but it was reverted because apparently it's "important". I don't see it this way at all (who cares about their outfits?), but I'm always a bit insecure about my edits, so I thought I'd bring this up on the talk page. Was I right to remove the whole section? WonderBuono! ( talk) 03:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
No, you weren't right 87.161.201.56 ( talk) 07:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes they are not important. They must be removed. 87 give a valid reason for reverting edits except that "You weren't right". 197.224.93.232 ( talk) 10:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
So there's a non-notable band that might be named after the show. This is trivial unless and until the band is notable and independent reliable sources discuss the band's connection to the show.
By way of comparison, a friend of mine had a band in college named after a planet in a well-known scifi movie. That band does not belong in the article about the movie either. - SummerPhD ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing the movies from the "Plot" section. The movies are part of the plot and their events must be included in the "Plot" section. 197.224.93.232 ( talk) 10:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Why is someone constantly removing the movies' plots? The movies plots are officially part of the series' plot and it was officially confirmed by the creators of the series. 197.224.69.105 ( talk) 20:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Here is the evidence that the movies are part of the series:
This is enough evidence that the movies are part of the plot and that your arguments are invalid. 197.225.197.91 ( talk) 10:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
You are, and Im first time on wiki, so dont tell lies... But just by the way the police is looking for you know,for trolling. They were the same meaning that you are trolling, cause they have seen your edits... You can call them if you dont believe me ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.146.200.228 ( talk) 20:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
The Winx Club films are not part of the television series, as they were released theatrically. Even though the plot of the movies is referenced in the series, they are not the same. The films are their own separate works based on the television series. They just happen to (mostly) follow the same continuity. WonderBuono! ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Where we can discuss its inclusion into this article. Tutelary ( talk) 15:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Future plot shouldnt stay there, also the newspaper Arent an official source cause they wrote sometime wrong plots. Also the plot of season6 was first post after it's aired. So it should be like season 7. Cause we dont know if the source is 100% offical HoseofLove ( talk) 15:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Future thing will be romve on other pages as well and its better. So it should be here as well. This site should be for everyone not only for your edis.. Look at the edit war yesterday HoseofLove ( talk) 15:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Do you get my argument? The site is for everonye and on the official winx club site is nothing of the plot of season 7. So the newspaper isnt an official source. But okay if you think so.. Everyone seems to hate me, tells lie about me, cause I have another opinion... Fine. HoseofLove ( talk) 15:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
It has been officially announced that a seventh season of Winx Club will be produced, slated for 2015. An official teaser summary of the season states that: "Each fairy will have an animal that has a special talent, necessary for the balance of the Magic Universe. The Winx will discover this, while facing two new dreadful villains and getting new transformations along their journey." [1] [2]
The second reference here is hidden behind a paywall.
The article you have selected requires a WorldScreen.com premium subscription.
Become a Member Now!
Subscription is just $99 for one whole year.
— nyuszika7h ( talk) 19:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
And here are the references:
References
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I have flagged the table at Winx Club#Cast and characters as being original research. Deciding on a season-by-season basis who is a main character and who the recurring or guest characters are seems to rely heavily on personal interpretation. Anyone have any sources? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Sigismondi, Paolo (1 June 2015). "The Winx Club phenomenon in the global animation landscape". Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies. 3 (3): 271–285. doi: 10.1386/jicms.3.3.271_1. -- 110.20.234.69 ( talk) 00:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international Winx Club voice actors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international Winx Club voice actors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
On the 4Kids dub of the series, there are multiple claims to who voices Stella and Darcy.
Stella:
Darcy:
The closing credits for 4Kids do not specify the roles, but Caren Manuel is listed among the Lead voices, whereas Birnbaum and Delaney are not listed. Birnbaum is listed among the DVD listing for Netflix: "Liza Jacqueline, Amy Birnbaum, Lisa Ortiz, Kerry Williams, Gregory Abbey, Dan Green, Michael Sinterniklaas, Caren Manuel, Suzy Myers, Christina Rodriguez, Dani Schaffel, Sebastian Arcelus, Rachael Lillis" HERE and so is Caren Manuel, but the online version Netflix Watch Instantly pertains to the RAI English version which has a completely different cast list. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
I mean why wikipedia first mention it Christina rodriguez and Amy Birnbaum? They not listed! How they make this mistake!?-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 20:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Winx Club WOW: World of Winx is still showing on Netflix as Coming Spring 2016. [3] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, my other question is "Why Liza Kaplan's article is redirect\contribut to Fox cast?". First we only had info about her voice career on fox! But later AngusWoof found a old page about her! And I know now that she is stopped bu fox! And works on and for philomel books! And but why she stopped!? Can anyone write a bio for her! Links\Refrence are mention it on her draft page!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 16:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anyone known why 4Kids don't mention it roles for the voice actors? But only names on the credits?! As for the vg they aren't mention it the names! Selfs from the voice actors not!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 21:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
I moved this section to the talk page as there isn't a proper Reception section to handle this, and it's a country-specific reception issue for a show that was broadcast there many years after the original version: AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 07:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
On 15 June 2017, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) imposed a fine of Rs. 500,000 (US$ 4,772) on Nikelodeon, over the episode "The Emperor's Throne" of Winx Club in which a female cartoon character was allegedly shown indecently dressed. After airing of the content, PEMRA issued a show cause notice to the channel to explain its position and after hearing the channel's representative it was found that the channel had violated multiple clauses of the Pakistan's Electronic Media Code of Conduct 2015. [1]
This could be revisited when the Reception is listed out for multiple countries especially the primary countries of broadcast. But for now see WP:CRIT and WP:WEIGHT doesn't justify it. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 07:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC) update 12:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
References
Hi, anyone have a proof that Haven is Darcy, Saskia is Stormy en Eilrrn is Lockette? Only saw at pokemon winx wiki and imdb! But i don't trust thata show real proof-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 14:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, why 4kids don't show the characters for the voice actors??? Very stupid is that!! Now we don't know who us Stella. If Caren don't saying Stella!-- Maxie1hoi ( talk) 18:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 17:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Winx Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
This series does not use star and recurring / guest star billing for their voice actors or characters so having one would be original research and not helpful. Please do not insert such a table in this article or the characters list. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
I've been WP:BOLD and removed two repetitive sections that go against the Manual of Style. Before my edit, there were two sections of intricate detail that did not belong on the main article. First, "Plot" listed paragraphs of individual seasons' plots, which belong on the separate season pages and not this one. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Plot section, the plot given on the main article should only "summarize the core storyline," which a section ("Premise") already does. Second, there was a very long IMDb-style list of unoriginal voice actors on the main article for the dubs (only English, no other dubs). The section under "Development" about the cast seems to cover the notable voice actors of the show without turning into a list of dub voices, which if at all, should go on the List of Winx Club characters page under their roles. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Cast and characters information says that cast sections need to be written "without simply re-iterating entertainment websites such as IMDb," which is exactly what the dub voice list was. Hammill Ten ( talk) 22:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello guys. I am the person who pushed the Russian Winx Club article to the featured status. I'm glad to see that someone is trying to make the English article look better too. I've skimmed through it, and I've come across this phrase that I don't like: "Roxy, the fairy of animals, occasionally joins the Winx and all three of the show's production companies refer to her as the Winx Club's seventh member". It definitely is not valuable information for the article and looks to me like a Roxy fan's attempt to make a point to everybody who doesn't think she's a Winx Club member. The sources provided merely quote a DVD cover and a couple of synopses, and we all know that those are written not by the creators but by promoters who often don't have a clue about the story. At the same time, even on the official website there's just six pages that represent Winx Club members: Bloom, Stella, Flora, Musa, Aisha, Tecna. If Roxy was a Winx Club member, there would definitely be a page devoted to her on the official website, provided that it's been 10 years since she "joined the club" as some fans think. But there's not. And the only reliable source confirming she's a member would only be an official interview or a direct statement from the creators and not from DVD covers/synopses. But even despite that, I will repeat: it's not the kind of information for Wikipedia. We as well could quote everything from DVD covers and promotional materials, but we don't do so, so why is this particular case with Roxy in any way important? Let fans have their own opinions regarding something that's not officially confirmed or disproved. And that statement from the article is merely a singe fan's attempt to make their opinion look "official". If there's no reasoned objections within a week, I'm removing that. Coolak ( talk) 14:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
The statement that "it is clear from the very cartoon" is original research, as the official supplemental materials explain Roxy's role in the cartoon in very clear terms ("a seventh fairy ... Roxy will join the Winx group"). Even if she does not appear as much as the other six anymore, she was introduced as the seventh member to join, as confirmed by the producers and the production companies before/during the fourth season. The references I've provided are first-party sources directly from the companies involved with the show; third-party references from news agencies also reported this same exact information (" Roxy, the new character who will become part of the close-knit Winx group"). You said "not every piece of info needs to be included," but this information is necessary to the paragraph as it is listing the members of the Winx. To exclude the character who is blatantly called the seventh fairy on the team would be incorrect. I'm sorry, but this conversation has gone nowhere. Opinionated original research doesn't override the many official sources. I can reiterate the additional sources I've given above if you need. Lagoona Blue ( talk) 19:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I noticed an addition, saying the Winx website "refers to Roxy as to a person separate from the Club" was added without discussion. The source referenced doesn't do this; it's a plot summary of a season 4 episode that highlights Roxy separately from the other Winx, saying "Roxy and the Winx"...the same exact wording is used for Bloom, who is also a Winx ( "Bloom and the Winx" on Season 6 story, page 8). I'll be removing the new content as it pretty clearly misrepresents the sources (we aren't going to say that "Bloom is a person separate from the Club" because of the website's exact same choice of words). Lagoona Blue ( talk) 19:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
The eighth season is not a reboot. If it was, the continuity from the previous seven seasons would be ignored. The cited source doesn't even say anything about a reboot, only that the series was targeting a younger audience and that the Netflix series would cater to older fans. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 11:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
A retool just means the production is being revamped in a way that doesn't affect show in-universe. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 22:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bloom (winx club charector). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Restored information on the show's original broadcast via 4Kids Entertainment and 4Kids TV. Nickelodeon wouldn't begin co-producing the series until season 5, and even then, Viacom (2005–2019) wouldn't acquire 30% of Rainbow until 2011. MarcoPolo250 ( talk) 00:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
if you see that the end date says present just know that is unsourced not only is that unsourced but if you go on edit source you can see next to the present it says yes so that person just wants winx club to be on in the present day now i dont know how to report but if you could tell me how to report that person that would be great — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingkobra775 ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
This features the same image that was on Wikia. Is this enough to prove that the image is real and not fan-made? https://www.winxcluball.com/2020/09/rainbow-srl-confirms-winx-club-season-9.html?m=1 79.100.210.106 ( talk) 05:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
What about this
http://imperoland.it/winx-club-torna-in-tv-14-febbraio/amp/ ? Does this count as a source?
109.160.111.223 (
talk)
20:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Does Channel Frederator count as a source? They also mentioned an upcoming Season 9 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlU9YfZlpcg 85.187.109.112 ( talk) 22:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
With the release of the Netflix original live action series more and more people are interested in the animated version however the many iterations of the show can be very confusing for newcomers this is why there needs to be two different Wikipedia pages for winx club.
One for the original Italian series and another one for the revitalized series. Newcomers to the series tend to find this article very confusing as it has merged all iterations of the show together.
Separating the two series would help new fans of the show understand the difference between the original tween series and the more child friendly revitalized series. There are many differences between the two series . The original is targeted at tweens and teenagers and dwells into darker and psychological themes while the revitalized series that begun with nickelodeon caters to a more kid friendly audience.
Also the characters have different personalities and backstories in each version of the show.
The original series consists of the first 4 seasons and the first 2 movies. The revived series starts when Viacom purchased the series and nickelodeon joined the production team.
All in all I believe that separating the two series is vital for the proper information of the fandom. BrightSilver ( talk) 17:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, when the show was re-launched in 2011, it wasn’t totally different from the original episodes. There were the re-animated specials that retold seasons 1-2, but even those weren't a full reboot. Even if it’s confusing because of the changes over time, it’s still part of the same show. TheFallenPower ( talk) 19:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I agree that it should not be split, just because the tone was changed, it does not make it a different show. They would not call Season 5 "Season 5" if it was a new show, they would call it Season 1. 109.160.111.223 ( talk) 12:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
It amazes me that the people who edithog this page have no earthly clue how the television business works and yet even they know that this is a bad idea. Thecleanerand ( talk) 14:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
First off, the entire article comes across as a fan blog rather than an objective piece that's supposed to at least provide the basic information to the show. There are just too many instances of non-consequential information that the average reader doesn't need to know to understand the show, made even worse because the people who edit this article don't have a basic cue to how the television broadcast nor the the TV animation industry works. Never mind the fact some people need to be educated on the difference between reboots and revivals, the fact that they mistook 4Kids Entertainment as a network rather than a production and entertainment company (one that did a localized dub of the show long before it became a Nickelodeon co-production that, for whatever reason, the editor decided to ignore) clearly shows how clueless they are. Finally, on top of all the pointless trivia, there are multiple instances of generic press quotes used throughout the page.
Do you know how frustrating it is for people who don't know what they're talking about and have no business editing any article relating to the business of television and media to reverse the edits of the people who do? Thecleanerand ( talk) 14:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Barebones nothing! The opening did summarize the article with the basic information without the need of paragraphs. Don't base your argument by comparing one bad article on this website to another! There were zero changes regarding the information about the show being retooled for a preschool audience, while the entry about the budget cuts to their "most expensive show" (non-neutral fanspeak) were deliberately blamed on Gladiators of Rome. Furthermore "additional context" IS pointless trivia, because the average reader doesn't need to know about it! And what is this backhanded talk about information that shouldn't be left out, when no one wants to address the fact that 4Kids did a localized dub long before Winx became a co-production. Thecleanerand ( talk) 04:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Again, don't base your argument by comparing one article on this website to another. I'm not arguing the need to explain the budget cuts and the production changes because those are explained in the actual article. The summary at the top of the page does not need four paragraphs to do what the article itself explains. Your opinion is to waste the average readers time with pointlness fluff and a non-neutral POV for the sake of Winx fans; this is not a fansite and this article shouldn't cater to them. "the 4Kids TV airings and dub are still mentioned"...in the context that 4Kids is a TV network that edited the show for its context rather than a licensing and production company that created their own localized version of the show (no different to Saban Entertainment) for broadcast on a block they produced for another network; the network in question, Fox Broadcasting Company, wasn't even mentioned. That section will only turn into "a long list of foreign dubs" if you assume every dub was done the same way. Anyone with common sense (ie, clearly not you) will know that straightforward dubs (non-localized, no editing) have been produced for the show; those dubs don't need to be mentioned unless other wise. Also, "the American purchase" wasn't "the original version" either, obviously that was the Italian broadcast. Nevermind the edits Nickelodeon's dub did for seasons 3 and 4 in order to tie them into the later seasons co-produced with Rainbow as part of the revival seasons. Thecleanerand ( talk) 12:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Thecleanerand, please stop edit warring without getting consensus for your deletions... Also, please read the note: "This section is for the original casts, not for dubs. Seasons 1-4 were animated to match the Italian voices, while 5-6 and the specials were done to match the Hollywood voices. Any third-party dubs, including 4Kids, are not original and do not belong in this section." There were other dubs that "created their own localized version of the show" too, like the German dub that had a completely new opening song and edits, but these are not the original casts. The original was just the Italian version for 2004-2009, then after the show became Italian-American, the page can start to mention that American information. TheFallenPower ( talk) 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
The German dub wasn't a localization; all it did was change the opening, not the actual content of the show. How can I get a consensus from people who don't have a clue nor care to get one? The fact that you people don't even know the difference between a straight dub and a localization (a la 4Kids or Saban) clearly shows you don't have the right to judge. I'm not edit warring, everyone else is treating this website like their own personal blog without any consideration for anyone else. Thecleanerand ( talk) 17:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Why voice actor section is deleted a long time ago? NiesNi ( talk) 19:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Since it is now clearly said to be a reboot series as the sneak peek calls it a brand new series rather than Season 9 (Season 9 is what it was originally said to be back when it was first announced in late 2020. They later said it is a reboot in late 2021 and have been calling it a reboot since but at the time it wasn't 100% clear that it was really a reboot series and not just another soft reboot), shouldn't we make a separate Winx Club (2025 TV series) page? 91.92.103.87 ( talk) 09:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)