![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiLeaks Political Party → WikiLeaks Party – Consistency of title with reference to it in the article. TimonRose ( talk) 21:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.The page has just been moved from The Wikileaks Party to Wikileaks Party.
At the AEC website it tells me that "The" is absolutely, definitely part of the name.
Tried to move it back myself but got an error page that was beyond me at this time of the morning.
But it must be moved back to The Wikileaks Party, because that's what it's called. HiLo48 ( talk) 22:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Full list of parties in Minor Party Alliance: Senator Online | Australian Voice Party | Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party | Family First | Stable Population Party | Party for Freedom | Australia First Party | Sex Party | WikiLeaks | Animal Justice Party | Stop CSG Party | Help End Marijuana Prohibition [HEMP] Party | Voluntary Euthanasia Party | Single Parents Party | Building Australia Party | Natural Medicine Party | Australian Independents Party | Climate Sceptics Party | Shooters and Fishers Party | One Nation | Australian Democrats (Darren Churchill) | Bullet Train for Australia Party | Bank Reform Party [2]. This article states "The party has been involved in Glenn Druery's Minor Party Alliance" which is in no way untrue. If the IP or others wish to expand on the issues (acrimony) between the MPA and WikiLeaks, feel free to do so using reliable sources such as the ones i've used. Timeshift ( talk) 12:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Wikileaks Party. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. ( non-admin closure) — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 18:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The Wikileaks Party →
WikiLeaks Party – Request move over a redirect. Title should conform to capitalization of "L" as used throughout
official website of the WikiLeaks Party, and omit "The" for same reason.
KalHolmann (
talk)
21:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
See WP:CSECTION. The Controversy section should be merged with the rest of the article. It is absurd to have two subsections dealing with the 2013 election. Jack Upland ( talk) 23:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
There are large gaps in the narrative. For example, the outcome of the 2014 election in WA and the exact reasons why the party was deregistered. The article seems to be written on the basis of assumed knowledge, e.g., the fact that Assange was in the Ecuadorian embassy is hardly mentioned. Restructuring is needed e.g. the 2013 election section should not be a subsection of Formation! Jack Upland ( talk) 00:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The article seems to be written on the basis of assumed knowledgewe should add some background in Formation
e.g. the 2013 election section should not be a subsection of Formation!yeah that confused me Softlemonades ( talk) 00:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiLeaks Political Party → WikiLeaks Party – Consistency of title with reference to it in the article. TimonRose ( talk) 21:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.The page has just been moved from The Wikileaks Party to Wikileaks Party.
At the AEC website it tells me that "The" is absolutely, definitely part of the name.
Tried to move it back myself but got an error page that was beyond me at this time of the morning.
But it must be moved back to The Wikileaks Party, because that's what it's called. HiLo48 ( talk) 22:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Full list of parties in Minor Party Alliance: Senator Online | Australian Voice Party | Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party | Family First | Stable Population Party | Party for Freedom | Australia First Party | Sex Party | WikiLeaks | Animal Justice Party | Stop CSG Party | Help End Marijuana Prohibition [HEMP] Party | Voluntary Euthanasia Party | Single Parents Party | Building Australia Party | Natural Medicine Party | Australian Independents Party | Climate Sceptics Party | Shooters and Fishers Party | One Nation | Australian Democrats (Darren Churchill) | Bullet Train for Australia Party | Bank Reform Party [2]. This article states "The party has been involved in Glenn Druery's Minor Party Alliance" which is in no way untrue. If the IP or others wish to expand on the issues (acrimony) between the MPA and WikiLeaks, feel free to do so using reliable sources such as the ones i've used. Timeshift ( talk) 12:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Wikileaks Party. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. ( non-admin closure) — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 18:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The Wikileaks Party →
WikiLeaks Party – Request move over a redirect. Title should conform to capitalization of "L" as used throughout
official website of the WikiLeaks Party, and omit "The" for same reason.
KalHolmann (
talk)
21:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
See WP:CSECTION. The Controversy section should be merged with the rest of the article. It is absurd to have two subsections dealing with the 2013 election. Jack Upland ( talk) 23:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
There are large gaps in the narrative. For example, the outcome of the 2014 election in WA and the exact reasons why the party was deregistered. The article seems to be written on the basis of assumed knowledge, e.g., the fact that Assange was in the Ecuadorian embassy is hardly mentioned. Restructuring is needed e.g. the 2013 election section should not be a subsection of Formation! Jack Upland ( talk) 00:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The article seems to be written on the basis of assumed knowledgewe should add some background in Formation
e.g. the 2013 election section should not be a subsection of Formation!yeah that confused me Softlemonades ( talk) 00:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)