![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from IEEE 802.11ax-2021 to Wi-Fi 6. The result of the discussion was moved. |
So why was Illegal actions of DensiFi SIG removed? I know it is there now and I think it should stay there but was it removed for a reason? Endercase ( talk) 18:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems a paid editor, CorporateM, was contacted, paid?, by Qualcomm to get it removed. They contacted several friendly editors and asked them to remove it. This has now been posted to several sites and a "streisand effect" has happened. This being removed now has drawn a lot more attention then if it had never been brought up. ContentEditman ( talk) 18:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
someone from Textron Financial Corporation tried to remove it 151.165.212.38 72.196.234.10 ( talk) 16:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
someone from Intel , 192.55.54.40, tried to remove it. Why so many companies and paid editors want this remoivced??? 173.66.244.194 ( talk) 18:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Under “devices”, it says Solartech is building a solar powered free WiFi network in Seattle. I can’t find a single news item on this remarkable announcement, and the company website is cheap and vague. I don’t think this product exists, has permits, or can possibly work given the tremendous power use of WiMAX and similar systems. The Washington state Secretary of State has no listing or permit requests for an organization called Solartech, and the Washington State Investment Board has no record of any such startup. I ran internal and Google searches on both websites for “solartech”. Please advise. YouBloodyMook ( talk) 16:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I think it's quite dubious to claim any product supports (non-draft) 802.11ax, let alone being the first, years before the standard will actually be approved. If past experience with 802.11n and ac were any indication, it will take a couple of iterations of silicon after the rectification before the manufacturers can implement the complicated bits of the standards correctly. Products that implement a draft standard should clearly state so. If the draft version cannot be determined through the sources, I think the content should be removed. 5.70.160.220 ( talk) 19:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I think the numbers in the first row of the table at the beginning of the article are wrong. If modulation changes from QPSK to BPSK, then with each data symbol we transmit half of the information as before. Given that coding doesn't change (1/2), the first row should be precisely half of the second one. My calculations suggest that it's the first row that is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.254.77.223 ( talk) 12:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
802.11ax is the based of wifi 6. Not the samething as claimed in this article. Wifi is controlled by Wifi consortium TM and 802.11 is controlled by IEEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.91.134.66 ( talk)
For a matter of regularity with the others IEEE Standard and Wi-Fi Generation, this article should be renamed "IEEE 802.11be" DelofJ ( talk) 12:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I know that this is basic information, but whether ax is backwards compatible should be in the opening paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.246.250 ( talk) 05:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
The intro says the technology 802.11ax is being marketed as Wi-Fi 6, and while that is also true, it's more importantly proposed as a new naming scheme, that simplifies understanding / identifying technology, which Wikipedia readers certainly would appreciate. See (maybe expound) Wi-Fi#Etymology_and_terminology and Wi-Fi#Versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponken ( talk • contribs) 09:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, would it be relevant to add a table such a this one? /info/en/?search=IEEE_802.11ac-2013#Advertised_Speeds
I've found at least these values in various web pages: AX3000 AX4200 AX5400 AX6000 AX6600 AX11000
The one having the most values is this one: https://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Nighthawk-12-Stream-Router-Rax200/dp/B07PNR2VMD
-- Tuxayo ( talk) 02:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 ( talk) 09:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
IEEE 802.11ax-2021 → Wi-Fi 6 – No one but advanced experts in this field would be searching for this article by its IEEE number, nor know what this article is about from its IEEE number. The article mentions that it is also commonly marketed as Wi-Fi 6, so most people would know it by that name instead. I feel according to WP:COMMONNAME Wi-Fi 6 would be a much more descriptive title for most readers. Wowmom98 ( talk) 08:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Passward mecking but folse passward 103.138.173.224 ( talk) 04:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Narma committee hall Muzaffarpur 106.77.179.127 ( talk) 15:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 16 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from IEEE 802.11ax-2021 to Wi-Fi 6. The result of the discussion was moved. |
So why was Illegal actions of DensiFi SIG removed? I know it is there now and I think it should stay there but was it removed for a reason? Endercase ( talk) 18:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems a paid editor, CorporateM, was contacted, paid?, by Qualcomm to get it removed. They contacted several friendly editors and asked them to remove it. This has now been posted to several sites and a "streisand effect" has happened. This being removed now has drawn a lot more attention then if it had never been brought up. ContentEditman ( talk) 18:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
someone from Textron Financial Corporation tried to remove it 151.165.212.38 72.196.234.10 ( talk) 16:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
someone from Intel , 192.55.54.40, tried to remove it. Why so many companies and paid editors want this remoivced??? 173.66.244.194 ( talk) 18:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Under “devices”, it says Solartech is building a solar powered free WiFi network in Seattle. I can’t find a single news item on this remarkable announcement, and the company website is cheap and vague. I don’t think this product exists, has permits, or can possibly work given the tremendous power use of WiMAX and similar systems. The Washington state Secretary of State has no listing or permit requests for an organization called Solartech, and the Washington State Investment Board has no record of any such startup. I ran internal and Google searches on both websites for “solartech”. Please advise. YouBloodyMook ( talk) 16:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I think it's quite dubious to claim any product supports (non-draft) 802.11ax, let alone being the first, years before the standard will actually be approved. If past experience with 802.11n and ac were any indication, it will take a couple of iterations of silicon after the rectification before the manufacturers can implement the complicated bits of the standards correctly. Products that implement a draft standard should clearly state so. If the draft version cannot be determined through the sources, I think the content should be removed. 5.70.160.220 ( talk) 19:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I think the numbers in the first row of the table at the beginning of the article are wrong. If modulation changes from QPSK to BPSK, then with each data symbol we transmit half of the information as before. Given that coding doesn't change (1/2), the first row should be precisely half of the second one. My calculations suggest that it's the first row that is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.254.77.223 ( talk) 12:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
802.11ax is the based of wifi 6. Not the samething as claimed in this article. Wifi is controlled by Wifi consortium TM and 802.11 is controlled by IEEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.91.134.66 ( talk)
For a matter of regularity with the others IEEE Standard and Wi-Fi Generation, this article should be renamed "IEEE 802.11be" DelofJ ( talk) 12:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I know that this is basic information, but whether ax is backwards compatible should be in the opening paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.246.250 ( talk) 05:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
The intro says the technology 802.11ax is being marketed as Wi-Fi 6, and while that is also true, it's more importantly proposed as a new naming scheme, that simplifies understanding / identifying technology, which Wikipedia readers certainly would appreciate. See (maybe expound) Wi-Fi#Etymology_and_terminology and Wi-Fi#Versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponken ( talk • contribs) 09:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, would it be relevant to add a table such a this one? /info/en/?search=IEEE_802.11ac-2013#Advertised_Speeds
I've found at least these values in various web pages: AX3000 AX4200 AX5400 AX6000 AX6600 AX11000
The one having the most values is this one: https://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Nighthawk-12-Stream-Router-Rax200/dp/B07PNR2VMD
-- Tuxayo ( talk) 02:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 ( talk) 09:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
IEEE 802.11ax-2021 → Wi-Fi 6 – No one but advanced experts in this field would be searching for this article by its IEEE number, nor know what this article is about from its IEEE number. The article mentions that it is also commonly marketed as Wi-Fi 6, so most people would know it by that name instead. I feel according to WP:COMMONNAME Wi-Fi 6 would be a much more descriptive title for most readers. Wowmom98 ( talk) 08:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Passward mecking but folse passward 103.138.173.224 ( talk) 04:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Narma committee hall Muzaffarpur 106.77.179.127 ( talk) 15:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)