![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi, as not getting used in DR on EN-WP, i read the message you @ CorbieVreccan: noticed on my talk, as well imho there's, as of about 00:13, no DR started.
Seriously, Notability? Minimal sourcing. See connected articles. are your User:CorbieVreccan only reasons; in short, imho you're completly wrong:
So you'll have no more adequate reasons for a DR-request, what are real reasons to be discussed?
Honestly confused about that DR, please explain other Wikipedia enthusiasts hopefully reading and me please your motives, thx and kindly regards, Roland zh 00:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC) [added festivals on 00:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)]
See my reply at the WP:Help Desk. I don't see this article as meeting any of the criteria for speedy deletion, at least not without a statement to that effect by the nominator. On the other hand, it is unfortunate that the author of the article is so angry, and that isn't helping. I see nothing to mediate. The proper forum for discussing whether the film is notable and therefore whether the article is encyclopedic is indeed articles for deletion. The proper means for resolving this dispute over keeping or deleting this article is, in my opinion, AFD. That is the way it is. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi, as not getting used in DR on EN-WP, i read the message you @ CorbieVreccan: noticed on my talk, as well imho there's, as of about 00:13, no DR started.
Seriously, Notability? Minimal sourcing. See connected articles. are your User:CorbieVreccan only reasons; in short, imho you're completly wrong:
So you'll have no more adequate reasons for a DR-request, what are real reasons to be discussed?
Honestly confused about that DR, please explain other Wikipedia enthusiasts hopefully reading and me please your motives, thx and kindly regards, Roland zh 00:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC) [added festivals on 00:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)]
See my reply at the WP:Help Desk. I don't see this article as meeting any of the criteria for speedy deletion, at least not without a statement to that effect by the nominator. On the other hand, it is unfortunate that the author of the article is so angry, and that isn't helping. I see nothing to mediate. The proper forum for discussing whether the film is notable and therefore whether the article is encyclopedic is indeed articles for deletion. The proper means for resolving this dispute over keeping or deleting this article is, in my opinion, AFD. That is the way it is. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)