This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing a journal from
Elsevier, the world's largest publisher of medical and scientific literature, see [deprecated source?
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science a
Springer journal, which is abstracted/Indexed in: Academic Search, Current Abstracts, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, Neuroscience Citation Index, OCLC, PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), SCOPUS, Social Science Citation Index, Social SciSearch, Summon by Serial Solutions, and TOC Premier. See
[4]
1, Referenced in review of different book in book forum, 2, Search of that site yields no results, 3, Search of that site yields no results, 4, Not a
WP:RS and notability of publisher is irrelevant, 5, Search of that site yields no results. Taken as a whole these are less than impressive. Verbalchat09:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Instead of searching for the material yourself and not being able to find it, next time please ask John to reproduce it here, or give you a link. Obviously he is not making this up, so you must not have looked in the right places.
Mitsube (
talk)
04:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)reply
New version
I don't know what he merits of Verbal's claims above are, but it is certainly true that the fact claims of the current article are thoroughly referenced to reliable sourced, and there are many instances of the book being discussed in notable publications. I am restoring it.
Mitsube (
talk)
04:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Agree with Johfos, Mitsube and EPadmirateur that this article should not be deleted and the title redirected, except by
consensus. This book is by a notable, (albeit controversial) author and is sourced. Verbal appears to disagree and is edit waring to assert his point of view. Let's cease the edit waring and look at evidence and sources. Verbal, would you be able to present your point of view now?
Sunray (
talk)
05:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing a journal from
Elsevier, the world's largest publisher of medical and scientific literature, see [deprecated source?
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science a
Springer journal, which is abstracted/Indexed in: Academic Search, Current Abstracts, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, Neuroscience Citation Index, OCLC, PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), SCOPUS, Social Science Citation Index, Social SciSearch, Summon by Serial Solutions, and TOC Premier. See
[4]
1, Referenced in review of different book in book forum, 2, Search of that site yields no results, 3, Search of that site yields no results, 4, Not a
WP:RS and notability of publisher is irrelevant, 5, Search of that site yields no results. Taken as a whole these are less than impressive. Verbalchat09:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Instead of searching for the material yourself and not being able to find it, next time please ask John to reproduce it here, or give you a link. Obviously he is not making this up, so you must not have looked in the right places.
Mitsube (
talk)
04:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)reply
New version
I don't know what he merits of Verbal's claims above are, but it is certainly true that the fact claims of the current article are thoroughly referenced to reliable sourced, and there are many instances of the book being discussed in notable publications. I am restoring it.
Mitsube (
talk)
04:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Agree with Johfos, Mitsube and EPadmirateur that this article should not be deleted and the title redirected, except by
consensus. This book is by a notable, (albeit controversial) author and is sourced. Verbal appears to disagree and is edit waring to assert his point of view. Let's cease the edit waring and look at evidence and sources. Verbal, would you be able to present your point of view now?
Sunray (
talk)
05:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)reply