This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

This article now lists some impressive sources, which include:

• American Journal of Psychiatry, the official journal of the American Psychiatric Association, see [1]
• Anthropology of Consciousness a Wiley-Blackwell journal, see [2]
• British Medical Journal, see [3]
• EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing a journal from Elsevier, the world's largest publisher of medical and scientific literature, see [ ^{deprecated source?}
• Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science a Springer journal, which is abstracted/Indexed in: Academic Search, Current Abstracts, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, Neuroscience Citation Index, OCLC, PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), SCOPUS, Social Science Citation Index, Social SciSearch, Summon by Serial Solutions, and TOC Premier. See [4]

-- Johnfos ( talk) 22:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

1, Referenced in review of different book in book forum, 2, Search of that site yields no results, 3, Search of that site yields no results, 4, Not a WP:RS and notability of publisher is irrelevant, 5, Search of that site yields no results. Taken as a whole these are less than impressive. Verbal chat 09:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Instead of searching for the material yourself and not being able to find it, next time please ask John to reproduce it here, or give you a link. Obviously he is not making this up, so you must not have looked in the right places. Mitsube ( talk) 04:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I don't know what he merits of Verbal's claims above are, but it is certainly true that the fact claims of the current article are thoroughly referenced to reliable sourced, and there are many instances of the book being discussed in notable publications. I am restoring it. Mitsube ( talk) 04:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Verbal, please explain why you performed the delete by redirect of the new version of the article ( [5]). Mitsube ( talk) 04:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply

• I agree with this change. -- EPadmirateur ( talk) 13:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC) reply
• Agree with Johfos, Mitsube and EPadmirateur that this article should not be deleted and the title redirected, except by consensus. This book is by a notable, (albeit controversial) author and is sourced. Verbal appears to disagree and is edit waring to assert his point of view. Let's cease the edit waring and look at evidence and sources. Verbal, would you be able to present your point of view now? Sunray ( talk) 05:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply
• Agree, article clearly meets WP:NBOOK due to multiple reviews. Yworo ( talk) 17:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply