![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
While reading through this page, I noticed that there were only 2 citations listed. A few more would be most useful, especially in the history section! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torspedia ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
The article presently states of the 1789 American revision: "It also removes explicit identification of the Pope as the Antichrist." Is this correct? My impression was that this did not formally happen until 1903 in the PCUSA.--J.A.
Unfortunately, my comments were posted on the entry instead of this discussion page (my apologies, I'm new to this). My criticism is that there is far too much coverage of the American situation in regard to this topic than is possibly warranted.
Chapter XXV section VI states: There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ: nor can the Pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that is called God.
Clearly this is a significant historical reference to the Protestant Reformation backlash to the doctrinal errors and abuses of the Catholic Church. Primarily due to the proliferation of the Gutenberg Bible in the 15th century. By the early 17th century, all of western Europe had recognized the prophetic fulfillment of the Papacy as the beast power of Revelation 13.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkellysda7 ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
What was/is the influence, if any, of the WCF in non-English-speaking countries and places? The article says nothing about this. Acwilson9 ( talk) 03:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
While reading through this page, I noticed that there were only 2 citations listed. A few more would be most useful, especially in the history section! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torspedia ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
The article presently states of the 1789 American revision: "It also removes explicit identification of the Pope as the Antichrist." Is this correct? My impression was that this did not formally happen until 1903 in the PCUSA.--J.A.
Unfortunately, my comments were posted on the entry instead of this discussion page (my apologies, I'm new to this). My criticism is that there is far too much coverage of the American situation in regard to this topic than is possibly warranted.
Chapter XXV section VI states: There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ: nor can the Pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that is called God.
Clearly this is a significant historical reference to the Protestant Reformation backlash to the doctrinal errors and abuses of the Catholic Church. Primarily due to the proliferation of the Gutenberg Bible in the 15th century. By the early 17th century, all of western Europe had recognized the prophetic fulfillment of the Papacy as the beast power of Revelation 13.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkellysda7 ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
What was/is the influence, if any, of the WCF in non-English-speaking countries and places? The article says nothing about this. Acwilson9 ( talk) 03:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)