|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clare Turlay Newberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babette. ( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Tol | Talk | Contribs 23:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your discussion with User:Redrose64 over at the Mekons (via Lowercase sigmabot III's archive how to). I think it worthwhile to explain the purpose of archive bots and what "archived content" means generally. (Read more WP:ARCHIVE)
So you see I understand you are acting in good faith when you took it upon yourself to disable the archive bot and revert its changes. But in actual fact you are disrupting the normal intended working of Wikipedia. I would therefore like to ask you to stop.
Please understand that archive bots are doing good work that Wikipedians want done. There is no good reason to keep discussion topics open even after a year of no replies. These should be archived. In fact, many many Talk pages archive much faster than on a yearly basis. Most common is probably 30 days, but some high-traffic pages archive after as little as 3 days or perhaps even less.
Please read WP:ARCHIVE before making further alterations to archive pages or archival bots. You are entirely free to not do so, but please then abstain from changing things you do not fully understand. You are more than welcome to ask questions over at the Teahouse, our friendly place for newcomers. They will help you and answer any questions you might have. Feel entirely free to point them to comment upon this message of mine if you want a second opinion on what's what.
Now. I need you to understand your actions, while I'm sure made with the best of intentions, will be considered disruptive if you continue. Sometimes editors have good intentions, but are not competent enough to edit in a net positive manner. They create work that others have to clean up. (Source: WP:COMPETENCE)
I wish you the best and look forward to many useful contributions from you. Cheers, CapnZapp ( talk) 09:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holy Cross Hospital (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Sinai Hospital. ( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mollys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americana.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clare Turlay Newberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babette. ( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Tol | Talk | Contribs 23:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your discussion with User:Redrose64 over at the Mekons (via Lowercase sigmabot III's archive how to). I think it worthwhile to explain the purpose of archive bots and what "archived content" means generally. (Read more WP:ARCHIVE)
So you see I understand you are acting in good faith when you took it upon yourself to disable the archive bot and revert its changes. But in actual fact you are disrupting the normal intended working of Wikipedia. I would therefore like to ask you to stop.
Please understand that archive bots are doing good work that Wikipedians want done. There is no good reason to keep discussion topics open even after a year of no replies. These should be archived. In fact, many many Talk pages archive much faster than on a yearly basis. Most common is probably 30 days, but some high-traffic pages archive after as little as 3 days or perhaps even less.
Please read WP:ARCHIVE before making further alterations to archive pages or archival bots. You are entirely free to not do so, but please then abstain from changing things you do not fully understand. You are more than welcome to ask questions over at the Teahouse, our friendly place for newcomers. They will help you and answer any questions you might have. Feel entirely free to point them to comment upon this message of mine if you want a second opinion on what's what.
Now. I need you to understand your actions, while I'm sure made with the best of intentions, will be considered disruptive if you continue. Sometimes editors have good intentions, but are not competent enough to edit in a net positive manner. They create work that others have to clean up. (Source: WP:COMPETENCE)
I wish you the best and look forward to many useful contributions from you. Cheers, CapnZapp ( talk) 09:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holy Cross Hospital (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Sinai Hospital. ( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mollys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americana.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)