![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Removing the weirdness about dozens of unquarantined cases in the US. Aside from being obviously untrue, I can't find any reliable sources for it elsewhere, and its not mentioned in the article body. 2601:A:4E00:1EA:21F:5BFF:FEBF:3D3E ( talk) 19:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Re wrote the part about Conakry. Added the info aboit Senegal" Lozion ( talk) 16:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Read reference 3, which states a changed number of deaths but also a changed number of infected. The number of infected in the summary has not been adjusted. Should this be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.145.39.42 ( talk) 09:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
As I mentioned at ITN, this should be moved to reflect the proper capitalisation which (as far as I'm aware) is Ebola or Ebola haemorrhagic fever for the disease, Ebola virus informally for the virus, technically Zaire ebolavirus species in the Ebolavirus genus. Espresso Addict ( talk) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
-Can someone help me fix the citation 7 error. I dont know how. txs. Lozion ( talk) 20:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Txs to all of you and especially User:The_Rambling_Man for your help.
{{
Help me}}
I uploaded a new situation map and apparently it got flagged for copyright violation although I provided the info., at least to the 28 march (1st) version.
-Even if I provided a link that is mentions reuse is ok? See here at bottom http://ercportal.jrc.ec.europa.eu Lozion ( talk) 23:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
-I'll try to find one. Lozion ( talk) 23:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
The info box says 95 deaths, the article says 89, and the news says 84. What's up with the death rate? We need to find a single source (such as the WHO) and stick with it. IanSan5653 ( talk) 14:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Agreed, found this: http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2014/04/who-update-on-ebola-april-2.html Lozion ( talk) 15:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
There is nothing on the CDC page (quote number 3) or any Al-Jazeera article regarding those cases in Sierra Leone. I could not find any source confirming what is written there. Suturn ( talk) 07:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm not so good at writing, so I'll leave it up to you...
I've received a lot of informations from MSF, which is the oragnization more or less in charge there ! They have nearly sixty medical staff on the field.
A link http://www.msf.org/article/guinea-mobilisation-against-unprecedented-ebola-epidemic
Also HOT has activated ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2014_West_Africa_Ebola_Response) I think it's worth mentioning.
Sorry I don't do the work myself, regards. H mlet ( talk) 10:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
see the telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/mali/10743721/Mali-reports-three-suspected-Ebola-cases.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.27.50 ( talk) 14:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/11280669 i think shows a public panic which is interesting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.205.218.167 ( talk) 14:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
>> WHO: Ebola outbreak among 'most challenging' Lihaas ( talk) 17:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/health-headlines/west-africa-ebola-outbreak-toll-increases-mali-tests-negative-1.1776327 was it ever? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.206.9.62 ( talk) 17:37, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-04-19/guinea-halves-ebola-toll-after-some-deaths-captured-three-times — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.38.61 ( talk) 06:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Anyone else heard anything? Can we get sources placed here before they are confirmed so the information can be included in the article as soon as possible? 106.69.174.251 ( talk) 05:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Harlequin
www.infowars.com/report-ebola-suspected-in-europe-broken-through-all-containment-efforts/ infowars.com is fringe, does not meet our sourcing guidelines and should not be used
but how trustable is the news service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.39.170 ( talk) 06:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
This is reliable news service, direct from Italy. It is one of the many references. http://www.vnews24.it/2014/04/19/ebola-epidemia-italia
So far it hasn't been confirmed as Ebola but an entire hospital has been put under quarantine because of roughly 40 infected individuals suffering from severe fever and conjunctivitis in Pisa, Italy. That the government there is refusing to state why an entire hospital is under quarantine has enraged local families. Can we get some Western journalistic sources? Understandably the Italian government would refuse to disclose information like this because of tourism. As such there have been no articles shutting down any alternative sites claiming it, which is odd since that's usually the quickest thing to happen when fake news pops up.
Archiving of coverage under an official source can be established would be the best way to finding out whether or not this is true. 124.148.216.118 ( talk) 11:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Harlequin
http://currents.plos.org/outbreaks/article/phylogenetic-analysis-of-guinea-2014-ebov-ebolavirus-outbreak-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.201.130 ( talk) 21:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
The mortality rate is much lower than the others. Or there are much more deaths or the cases are much less than the reported now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopoldo Martin R ( talk • contribs) 21:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I think we should include a section about this theme: high number of affected countries, cases and of deaths and why has Ebola been so hard to stop in West Africa. I suggest this article: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/06/18/323213138/doctors-aren-t-sure-how-to-stop-africa-s-deadliest-ebola-outbreak Mtchief ( talk) 15:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a new version of the situation map which can be retrieved from www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/images/outbreaks/7_17_WAfEbolaENG_L.zip -- 23:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Can we please hold off on adding the Nigerian case to the table at the bottom. Those figures come from regular reports posted by the WHO and CDC. Just adding it to an old report renders it incorrect. Please just wait for the next report. The Nigerian case can be, and is, mentioned elsewhere in the article. Donners ( talk) 09:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
There may not be any more cases that show up in Nigeria. This lone case is easily handled with a statement at the top and doing so avoids taking up a lot of extra space for the table that buys you nothing. -- 66.41.154.0 ( talk) 21:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Also, in just a few more weeks, the number of rows in the table will start to get excessive. Something will need to be done about that, like make a single entry that covers a week or two. This outbreak will be a long affair. It's not ending anytime soon. -- 66.41.154.0 ( talk) 21:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Really shouldn't all WHO cases that they have be counted, as i agree it is picking and choosing. Unless the section and how it is displayed is changed, the Nigerian case should be their with the others. Rump1234 ( talk) 14:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I have found no reliable source for the claim of a suspected Ebola patient in Brazil. Shouldn't this be removed from the tally at the top of the page? It's too bold a claim to make without any evidence to support it. -- Delta1989 ( talk) ( contributions) 12:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I thought it would be informative, beneficial to the article, to include a section on screening measures adopted by airports/countries and such, with a focus on the technologies involved. Currently there is some info on how laboratories treat the virus or how on the local level help workers run isolation units, or containment challenges. prokaryotes ( talk) 16:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I see that this has been added to the casualty list at the top of the page. If it is the same person referred to in this article - http://www.le360.ma/fr/societe/panique-a-casablanca-autour-de-lebola-19159 - then the person did not have Ebola.
"The Department of Health said Thursday that a Liberian citizen died at the Mohammed V International Airport in Casablanca of a heart attack and not the disease Ebola. "A Liberian national, aged 44, from Monrovia, died suddenly Tuesday, July 29, in the transit area of the airport Mohammed V in Casablanca. After analyzes conducted at the Pasteur Institute of Casablanca, it is found that the Liberian was not carrying the Ebola virus, death being due to a heart attack, "reassured the Ministry of Health in a statement. These analyzes were performed in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)"
Unless it is clearly another case, that should be removed.
There are a lot of dubious suspected cases being reported at the moment - the data for these on the page should be limited to a single source, namely the regular WHO reports. Donners ( talk) 05:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Should be added -- -- CFCF 🍌 ( email) 08:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm not 100% sure, so I thought I would ask. Are International organization removing people from the area? I know of at least one, but if it's an isolated event, I didn't think it was notable enough to add.
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)</ref>-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk) 12:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
please add, CNN source video, Dr Sanjay Gupta: U.S. Health Authorities Concealing Number of Suspected Ebola Victims From Public, test results from 6 isolated patients with suspected exposure - 1:50 https://www.youtube.com/... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 19:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Pandemic? -- 2A02:1810:111:9A00:9DD7:ADFF:CFC4:1805 ( talk) 18:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/08/06/CDC-Refuses-to-Identify-Where-Previous-Ebola-Tests-Originated breitbart.com is fringe, does not meet our sourcing guidelines and should not be used
CDC refusing to divulge. please the needful to add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 20:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Does it not seem premature to add Spain to the list of countries affected given the repatriation of the individual has not yet occurred. As such, there has been no reported cases of Ebola on Spanish soil at this point. 132.216.227.13 ( talk) 03:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The current subheadings are a bit confusing: responses by organisations are categorised other "Response by country". I propose to create two subheadings: "Response by country" and "Response by organisations". 132.216.227.141 ( talk) 17:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The "Containment" section is rather empty - except for a quote from a USA organisation - since most references to containment measures are already discussed in the "Response" section. 132.216.227.141 ( talk) 17:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The USA, Spain,and Saudi Arabia should not be listed as currently epidemic until people are being infected domestically (and I would even exclude the doctors who directly treat the first imported case). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.130.183 ( talk) 20:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
"On Wednesday a suspected case of Ebola killed a Saudi man in Jeddah who recently visited Sierra Leone on business, meaning human cases of Ebola - once entirely confined to Africa - now likely have traveled to four continents."
Please alerts to the people before more die from Moslim plague. http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/chi-ebola-outbreak-20140807-story.html#page=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 22:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Public health officials have explained that the case of the British woman currently discussed in the article is one of an individual who MAY have been exposed to Ebola but who doesn't show any symptoms. The same health officials further say that "The reason we haven't spoken about this before is the individual is not currently a case of Ebola. There are dozens of these suspected cases all over the UK at the moment." (see: DailyMail article) In light of this, it seems premature to add the UK to the list of countries with suspected or non-transmissive cases, no? 132.216.227.161 ( talk) 14:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Is this confirmed he had the ebolas? Please advise the needful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 15:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
dead now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.210.140 ( talk) 13:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't imagine that it is beyond the scope of Wikipedia to discuss emerging conspiracy theories, but such discussions should be done using the same standards used throughout the encyclopedia. For this reason, I have removed the passage proposed by 213.113.169.11 and replaced it with one that seems more adequate. 132.216.227.161 ( talk) 15:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
"The Ebola outbreak can also be a blessing for Africa in the area of pharmaceuticals startups in Africa. African brands in the medical industry can start looking for ways to solve their own problems."
Some readers may react to the wording of this, calling the outbreak a "blessing." Any suggestions for alternatives?
DarkLightA ( talk) 20:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Removing the weirdness about dozens of unquarantined cases in the US. Aside from being obviously untrue, I can't find any reliable sources for it elsewhere, and its not mentioned in the article body. 2601:A:4E00:1EA:21F:5BFF:FEBF:3D3E ( talk) 19:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Re wrote the part about Conakry. Added the info aboit Senegal" Lozion ( talk) 16:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Read reference 3, which states a changed number of deaths but also a changed number of infected. The number of infected in the summary has not been adjusted. Should this be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.145.39.42 ( talk) 09:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
As I mentioned at ITN, this should be moved to reflect the proper capitalisation which (as far as I'm aware) is Ebola or Ebola haemorrhagic fever for the disease, Ebola virus informally for the virus, technically Zaire ebolavirus species in the Ebolavirus genus. Espresso Addict ( talk) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
-Can someone help me fix the citation 7 error. I dont know how. txs. Lozion ( talk) 20:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Txs to all of you and especially User:The_Rambling_Man for your help.
{{
Help me}}
I uploaded a new situation map and apparently it got flagged for copyright violation although I provided the info., at least to the 28 march (1st) version.
-Even if I provided a link that is mentions reuse is ok? See here at bottom http://ercportal.jrc.ec.europa.eu Lozion ( talk) 23:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
-I'll try to find one. Lozion ( talk) 23:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
The info box says 95 deaths, the article says 89, and the news says 84. What's up with the death rate? We need to find a single source (such as the WHO) and stick with it. IanSan5653 ( talk) 14:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Agreed, found this: http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2014/04/who-update-on-ebola-april-2.html Lozion ( talk) 15:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
There is nothing on the CDC page (quote number 3) or any Al-Jazeera article regarding those cases in Sierra Leone. I could not find any source confirming what is written there. Suturn ( talk) 07:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm not so good at writing, so I'll leave it up to you...
I've received a lot of informations from MSF, which is the oragnization more or less in charge there ! They have nearly sixty medical staff on the field.
A link http://www.msf.org/article/guinea-mobilisation-against-unprecedented-ebola-epidemic
Also HOT has activated ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2014_West_Africa_Ebola_Response) I think it's worth mentioning.
Sorry I don't do the work myself, regards. H mlet ( talk) 10:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
see the telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/mali/10743721/Mali-reports-three-suspected-Ebola-cases.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.27.50 ( talk) 14:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/11280669 i think shows a public panic which is interesting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.205.218.167 ( talk) 14:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
>> WHO: Ebola outbreak among 'most challenging' Lihaas ( talk) 17:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/health-headlines/west-africa-ebola-outbreak-toll-increases-mali-tests-negative-1.1776327 was it ever? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.206.9.62 ( talk) 17:37, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-04-19/guinea-halves-ebola-toll-after-some-deaths-captured-three-times — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.38.61 ( talk) 06:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Anyone else heard anything? Can we get sources placed here before they are confirmed so the information can be included in the article as soon as possible? 106.69.174.251 ( talk) 05:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Harlequin
www.infowars.com/report-ebola-suspected-in-europe-broken-through-all-containment-efforts/ infowars.com is fringe, does not meet our sourcing guidelines and should not be used
but how trustable is the news service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.49.39.170 ( talk) 06:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
This is reliable news service, direct from Italy. It is one of the many references. http://www.vnews24.it/2014/04/19/ebola-epidemia-italia
So far it hasn't been confirmed as Ebola but an entire hospital has been put under quarantine because of roughly 40 infected individuals suffering from severe fever and conjunctivitis in Pisa, Italy. That the government there is refusing to state why an entire hospital is under quarantine has enraged local families. Can we get some Western journalistic sources? Understandably the Italian government would refuse to disclose information like this because of tourism. As such there have been no articles shutting down any alternative sites claiming it, which is odd since that's usually the quickest thing to happen when fake news pops up.
Archiving of coverage under an official source can be established would be the best way to finding out whether or not this is true. 124.148.216.118 ( talk) 11:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Harlequin
http://currents.plos.org/outbreaks/article/phylogenetic-analysis-of-guinea-2014-ebov-ebolavirus-outbreak-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.201.130 ( talk) 21:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
The mortality rate is much lower than the others. Or there are much more deaths or the cases are much less than the reported now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopoldo Martin R ( talk • contribs) 21:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I think we should include a section about this theme: high number of affected countries, cases and of deaths and why has Ebola been so hard to stop in West Africa. I suggest this article: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/06/18/323213138/doctors-aren-t-sure-how-to-stop-africa-s-deadliest-ebola-outbreak Mtchief ( talk) 15:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a new version of the situation map which can be retrieved from www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/images/outbreaks/7_17_WAfEbolaENG_L.zip -- 23:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Can we please hold off on adding the Nigerian case to the table at the bottom. Those figures come from regular reports posted by the WHO and CDC. Just adding it to an old report renders it incorrect. Please just wait for the next report. The Nigerian case can be, and is, mentioned elsewhere in the article. Donners ( talk) 09:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
There may not be any more cases that show up in Nigeria. This lone case is easily handled with a statement at the top and doing so avoids taking up a lot of extra space for the table that buys you nothing. -- 66.41.154.0 ( talk) 21:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Also, in just a few more weeks, the number of rows in the table will start to get excessive. Something will need to be done about that, like make a single entry that covers a week or two. This outbreak will be a long affair. It's not ending anytime soon. -- 66.41.154.0 ( talk) 21:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Really shouldn't all WHO cases that they have be counted, as i agree it is picking and choosing. Unless the section and how it is displayed is changed, the Nigerian case should be their with the others. Rump1234 ( talk) 14:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I have found no reliable source for the claim of a suspected Ebola patient in Brazil. Shouldn't this be removed from the tally at the top of the page? It's too bold a claim to make without any evidence to support it. -- Delta1989 ( talk) ( contributions) 12:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I thought it would be informative, beneficial to the article, to include a section on screening measures adopted by airports/countries and such, with a focus on the technologies involved. Currently there is some info on how laboratories treat the virus or how on the local level help workers run isolation units, or containment challenges. prokaryotes ( talk) 16:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I see that this has been added to the casualty list at the top of the page. If it is the same person referred to in this article - http://www.le360.ma/fr/societe/panique-a-casablanca-autour-de-lebola-19159 - then the person did not have Ebola.
"The Department of Health said Thursday that a Liberian citizen died at the Mohammed V International Airport in Casablanca of a heart attack and not the disease Ebola. "A Liberian national, aged 44, from Monrovia, died suddenly Tuesday, July 29, in the transit area of the airport Mohammed V in Casablanca. After analyzes conducted at the Pasteur Institute of Casablanca, it is found that the Liberian was not carrying the Ebola virus, death being due to a heart attack, "reassured the Ministry of Health in a statement. These analyzes were performed in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)"
Unless it is clearly another case, that should be removed.
There are a lot of dubious suspected cases being reported at the moment - the data for these on the page should be limited to a single source, namely the regular WHO reports. Donners ( talk) 05:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Should be added -- -- CFCF 🍌 ( email) 08:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm not 100% sure, so I thought I would ask. Are International organization removing people from the area? I know of at least one, but if it's an isolated event, I didn't think it was notable enough to add.
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)</ref>-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk) 12:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
please add, CNN source video, Dr Sanjay Gupta: U.S. Health Authorities Concealing Number of Suspected Ebola Victims From Public, test results from 6 isolated patients with suspected exposure - 1:50 https://www.youtube.com/... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 19:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Pandemic? -- 2A02:1810:111:9A00:9DD7:ADFF:CFC4:1805 ( talk) 18:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/08/06/CDC-Refuses-to-Identify-Where-Previous-Ebola-Tests-Originated breitbart.com is fringe, does not meet our sourcing guidelines and should not be used
CDC refusing to divulge. please the needful to add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 20:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Does it not seem premature to add Spain to the list of countries affected given the repatriation of the individual has not yet occurred. As such, there has been no reported cases of Ebola on Spanish soil at this point. 132.216.227.13 ( talk) 03:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The current subheadings are a bit confusing: responses by organisations are categorised other "Response by country". I propose to create two subheadings: "Response by country" and "Response by organisations". 132.216.227.141 ( talk) 17:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The "Containment" section is rather empty - except for a quote from a USA organisation - since most references to containment measures are already discussed in the "Response" section. 132.216.227.141 ( talk) 17:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The USA, Spain,and Saudi Arabia should not be listed as currently epidemic until people are being infected domestically (and I would even exclude the doctors who directly treat the first imported case). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.130.183 ( talk) 20:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
"On Wednesday a suspected case of Ebola killed a Saudi man in Jeddah who recently visited Sierra Leone on business, meaning human cases of Ebola - once entirely confined to Africa - now likely have traveled to four continents."
Please alerts to the people before more die from Moslim plague. http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/chi-ebola-outbreak-20140807-story.html#page=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 22:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Public health officials have explained that the case of the British woman currently discussed in the article is one of an individual who MAY have been exposed to Ebola but who doesn't show any symptoms. The same health officials further say that "The reason we haven't spoken about this before is the individual is not currently a case of Ebola. There are dozens of these suspected cases all over the UK at the moment." (see: DailyMail article) In light of this, it seems premature to add the UK to the list of countries with suspected or non-transmissive cases, no? 132.216.227.161 ( talk) 14:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Is this confirmed he had the ebolas? Please advise the needful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 ( talk) 15:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
dead now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.210.140 ( talk) 13:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't imagine that it is beyond the scope of Wikipedia to discuss emerging conspiracy theories, but such discussions should be done using the same standards used throughout the encyclopedia. For this reason, I have removed the passage proposed by 213.113.169.11 and replaced it with one that seems more adequate. 132.216.227.161 ( talk) 15:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
"The Ebola outbreak can also be a blessing for Africa in the area of pharmaceuticals startups in Africa. African brands in the medical industry can start looking for ways to solve their own problems."
Some readers may react to the wording of this, calling the outbreak a "blessing." Any suggestions for alternatives?
DarkLightA ( talk) 20:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |