![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
For a project that was supposed to take only a few years to complete, an eight year schedule slip seems to imply that something very odd happened. This article doesn't mention what that might be. And that seems to be a major failing. Can anyone expand this? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
The device is finished and is currently tested. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.123.117 ( talk) 16:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Admittedly, this is a complex subject. And most readers never majored in Physics. I at least studied Chemistry and Physics in High School.
But I think many people would want you to explain, in a simple manner, what are the major differences between the "traditional" Tokomak Fusion Reactor and this new Stellarator fusion Reactor. I think that would be good to know. Robert DelRosso ( talk) 11:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
References
Redlinks really aren't that nice, so Wendelstein 7-AS should be created, it's crucial for the understanding of the research pre-7X. Thanks! :) Cheers, Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 14:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Even distribution of images would be a good place to start. Should the building appear in the infobox? Viriditas ( talk) 11:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
What explains the crazy twists and turns in the coils (colored blue in the figure). How was this geometry arrived at? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.238.77 ( talk) 16:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wendelstein 7-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v64/i9/p30_s1?view=printWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I noticed the following sentence was incomplete: "Then, on February 3, 2016, , with production of the first hydrogen plasma to initiate the science program." Missing content between the two comma's? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.211.239.121 ( talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Looks like some organizations (including few from Russia) are not listed in Colaborating Institutes section. The source: https://www.ipp.mpg.de/17004/kooperationen
The Timeline section needs updated as the last entry states that OP2 should begin in 2019. It now being December of 2019 and seems that OP2 may not begin until at least the coming year (2020.) Just a humble suggestion to keep the page from being out of date. Thank you. -- HenryTjernlund ( talk) 03:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
degree-second/m^3 is probably not correct, should rather be Ks/m^3, shouldn't it? what is the difference "degree-second/m^3" anyway :-) ?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
For a project that was supposed to take only a few years to complete, an eight year schedule slip seems to imply that something very odd happened. This article doesn't mention what that might be. And that seems to be a major failing. Can anyone expand this? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
The device is finished and is currently tested. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.123.117 ( talk) 16:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Admittedly, this is a complex subject. And most readers never majored in Physics. I at least studied Chemistry and Physics in High School.
But I think many people would want you to explain, in a simple manner, what are the major differences between the "traditional" Tokomak Fusion Reactor and this new Stellarator fusion Reactor. I think that would be good to know. Robert DelRosso ( talk) 11:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
References
Redlinks really aren't that nice, so Wendelstein 7-AS should be created, it's crucial for the understanding of the research pre-7X. Thanks! :) Cheers, Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 14:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Even distribution of images would be a good place to start. Should the building appear in the infobox? Viriditas ( talk) 11:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
What explains the crazy twists and turns in the coils (colored blue in the figure). How was this geometry arrived at? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.238.77 ( talk) 16:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wendelstein 7-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v64/i9/p30_s1?view=printWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I noticed the following sentence was incomplete: "Then, on February 3, 2016, , with production of the first hydrogen plasma to initiate the science program." Missing content between the two comma's? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.211.239.121 ( talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Looks like some organizations (including few from Russia) are not listed in Colaborating Institutes section. The source: https://www.ipp.mpg.de/17004/kooperationen
The Timeline section needs updated as the last entry states that OP2 should begin in 2019. It now being December of 2019 and seems that OP2 may not begin until at least the coming year (2020.) Just a humble suggestion to keep the page from being out of date. Thank you. -- HenryTjernlund ( talk) 03:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
degree-second/m^3 is probably not correct, should rather be Ks/m^3, shouldn't it? what is the difference "degree-second/m^3" anyway :-) ?