This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
We Found Love (music video) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
We Found Love (music video) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any way of putting it into the info box? Calvin • TalkThatTalk 22:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
OMG, look at
this. Do you think a Popular culture section could be made? I didn't realise how many references their were in the video to film and music.
Calvin •
TalkThatTalk 22:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I thought it was pretty clear that it was cigarette smoke being blown (in Rihanna and Dudley's mouths from one another), not marijuana. I just re-watched the video and I see smoke being blown after several cigarettes are lit, not a marijuana joint or blunt. Please explain?-- mikomango mwa! 20:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Can this be of any use for the article? "I appreciate that it’s different from the shtick she’s tried with her party anthems, but piggybacking so close to “We Found Love” by Rihanna isn’t doing this song any favors." My love is love ( talk) 14:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
What's the point in having a talk page, where you are mean't to discuss things which people feel should perhaps be changed, if someone is going to change the name of the article without asking or giving any explanation as to why. Calvin • TalkThatTalk 16:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn ( talk · contribs) 19:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I shall be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 19:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
This is how the article fairs against the GA criteria:
Overall, the article is in decent shape, and a nice (although rather "trippy", being a theme of the video) read. I will place the article on hold for seven days. -- Matthew RD 17:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 ( talk) 06:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
We Found Love (video) →
We Found Love (music video) – "Video" usually refers to video/DVD releases, such as
In the Zone (video) and
The Immaculate Collection (video).
Pancake (
talk) 16:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
non npov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.26.184.219 ( talk) 04:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
in man down it states that its directed by another director not same as on we found love
http://www.rap-up.com/2011/05/30/rihanna-sends-strong-message-in-man-down-video/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.26.184.219 ( talk) 04:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I think the article should point out also the blatant similarities with Radioactive by Marina and the Diamonds, some critics must have noted it-- 94.36.28.21 ( talk) 20:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Am I alone in finding the "controversy" section very silly? We have a "John Colonnello, a youth pastor from Athens, Alabama", a "Brandon Ward, a youth pastor of Oasis Christian Center in Staten Island", and one Doreen Reegan of the "Ulster Cancer Foundation" (whose opinion was so important it had to be sourced from the Hindustan Times of all places). Who are these people? What makes their opinions notable? Surely for controversy or criticism to be valid content it has to be from some person or some organisation of significance? I propose deleting the entire section, with the only salvageable content from it, the watershed banning on a french TV station, moved to another place if a source for it can be found (currently cited source is dead). 89.242.189.105 ( talk) 01:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
We Found Love (music video) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
We Found Love (music video) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any way of putting it into the info box? Calvin • TalkThatTalk 22:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
OMG, look at
this. Do you think a Popular culture section could be made? I didn't realise how many references their were in the video to film and music.
Calvin •
TalkThatTalk 22:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I thought it was pretty clear that it was cigarette smoke being blown (in Rihanna and Dudley's mouths from one another), not marijuana. I just re-watched the video and I see smoke being blown after several cigarettes are lit, not a marijuana joint or blunt. Please explain?-- mikomango mwa! 20:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Can this be of any use for the article? "I appreciate that it’s different from the shtick she’s tried with her party anthems, but piggybacking so close to “We Found Love” by Rihanna isn’t doing this song any favors." My love is love ( talk) 14:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
What's the point in having a talk page, where you are mean't to discuss things which people feel should perhaps be changed, if someone is going to change the name of the article without asking or giving any explanation as to why. Calvin • TalkThatTalk 16:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn ( talk · contribs) 19:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I shall be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 19:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
This is how the article fairs against the GA criteria:
Overall, the article is in decent shape, and a nice (although rather "trippy", being a theme of the video) read. I will place the article on hold for seven days. -- Matthew RD 17:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 ( talk) 06:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
We Found Love (video) →
We Found Love (music video) – "Video" usually refers to video/DVD releases, such as
In the Zone (video) and
The Immaculate Collection (video).
Pancake (
talk) 16:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
non npov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.26.184.219 ( talk) 04:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
in man down it states that its directed by another director not same as on we found love
http://www.rap-up.com/2011/05/30/rihanna-sends-strong-message-in-man-down-video/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.26.184.219 ( talk) 04:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I think the article should point out also the blatant similarities with Radioactive by Marina and the Diamonds, some critics must have noted it-- 94.36.28.21 ( talk) 20:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Am I alone in finding the "controversy" section very silly? We have a "John Colonnello, a youth pastor from Athens, Alabama", a "Brandon Ward, a youth pastor of Oasis Christian Center in Staten Island", and one Doreen Reegan of the "Ulster Cancer Foundation" (whose opinion was so important it had to be sourced from the Hindustan Times of all places). Who are these people? What makes their opinions notable? Surely for controversy or criticism to be valid content it has to be from some person or some organisation of significance? I propose deleting the entire section, with the only salvageable content from it, the watershed banning on a french TV station, moved to another place if a source for it can be found (currently cited source is dead). 89.242.189.105 ( talk) 01:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)