![]() | The article
Pilot (Warehouse 13) was
nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 18 July 2009 with a consensus to
merge the content into
Warehouse 13. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{
afd-merged-from}}. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Warehouse 13 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Warehouse 13. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Warehouse 13 at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does this show have any relation to the GURPS book Warehouse 23? The underlying concepts (what little is described so far) sound identical to the concepts of the sourcebook. ( 144.92.84.206 ( talk) 21:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC))
I believe a citation of similarity to The Librarian should be added since Friday the 13th: The Series is noted. When I watched the pilot I definately got a X-Files, Librarian, FTT:TS vibe from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.23.68.40 ( talk) 12:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
GURPS Warehouse 23 = This Show. Of course, Warehouse 23 = the warehouse at the end of Indiana Jones first movie. Regardless, though, it's like these guys read the Warehouse 23 book and said, "Hey, look, this is a functional script." 65.16.205.188 ( talk) 22:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Terry Whisenant (Austin, TX)
This show seems a little like the FOX show "Fringe" doesn't it? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.79.90.189 (
talk) 16:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
How do we know the cloak is "Fox" skin? It looks like deer to me. Sheherazahde ( talk) 06:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there a book to this series or are they just not out yet. I checked Amazon and could only find "Data Warehouse" suggestions (Darn preference history settings I guess - I hate those.) 71.236.26.74 ( talk) 09:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that both pilots should be put under the same heading in the table, though I'm not sure how one would go about formatting that properly. There are several reasons for this to happen. It wasn't really two episodes. Yes, it took 2 hours, but it was essentially just one, double length, episode. There was only one episodic story, and there wasn't a clear definition of where one "episode" would end, and the next begins. Furthermore, the plot description for the second pilot is lacking substance (because it's the same plot as the first).
Does anyone know how they could be merged properly? I've tried looking on other TV show pages, but most of them have only one hour pilots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.248.22 ( talk) 02:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
when looking at isohunt.com the pilot is listed in one file but labeled as episode 1 & 2. episode 3 is called resonance. the listing on wikipedia is confusing because of the difference. (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.41.192 ( talk)
"Scene" numbering is what fans expect to see when they come to a wiki, get with the times man... —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostMK ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, what indications do we have that the rugby ball is special? To me, on first viewing, the impression was given that that was an effect of the Warehouse and not the ball. Seems that 'items' would be too important to leave outside like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.57.202.221 ( talk) 12:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
What is the difference between a "rugby ball" and an American football? Sheherazahde ( talk) 18:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You must remember that there are many other Artifacts that are taken outside the warehouse. The tesla gun and the communications equipment for example. The warehouse is for devices that still need investigation and study before other's are ready to accept them.
I was under the impression that the ball was an ordinary rugby ball, and Artie and Pete were using the magnetic field surrounding the Warehouse to accelerate it fast enough to circle the earth. Just my impression, although there's no canon evidence either way... Kt'Hyla ( talk) 01:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
We just found out what the football is- it's an Artifact Tracker. During it's flight it collects information on artifacts worldwide and downloads the information as it passes over the warehouse. Saxophobia ( talk) 01:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
There are a number of artifacts that are not dangerous, and a number of them are in Artie's bag, that he carries around with him. My guess is that the ball is not dangerous, but Artie feels that it would not be very useful to him, so he tosses it around the world, instead of carring it with him. I get the impression that anything that has any supernatural power within it is taken to the warehouse; The ball could allow a team to win games unfairly and therefore needs to be kept out of the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.209.84 ( talk) 19:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Given the steampunk style and 'feel' very similar to that of Sanctuary (even the theme music!) it would be nice to have a citation for such a link. Anyone come across one though? -- AlisonW ( talk) 22:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
The items in every episode don't need to be listed, especially since only one or two actually have any relevance to the plot. Unlike The Lost Room, where the items are the focus, this show focuses more on getting the items. Things like the mirror, the football, laughing bell, and so forth have no effect on the plot, no more so than M. C. Escher designing the Warhouse's electrical grid (at least at the moment). As WP:TRIVIA notes, "Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information." These item lists apply. — Trust not the Penguin ( T | C) 19:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the football belongs on the list. It hasn't been expressly stated that the football is indeed an artifact. Another theory is that the football's ability to travel around the world when thrown may have more to do with the collected artifacts in the warehouse or possibly the location of the warehouse, but not the football itself. And that theory does bear argument since Artie is pretty anal about bagging, tagging and storing away even the most benign of artifacts, but he himself has been willing to throw the football. Ergo, until it's made clear outright that the football is indeed an artifact, I suggest taking it off the list. Or at least adding a line that it might possibly not be an artifact, but is instead affected by the other artifacts. Nolefan32 ( talk) 19:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Well seems that that effort went nowhere, it seems that people really want this detailed list. I'm going to move it to a separate page since it's getting pretty ridiculous, taking up half the article. Probably to Artifacts and gadgets from Warehouse 13. Xeworlebi ( t• c) 20:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
How come the full list of artifacts and gadgets was deleted and merged into one tiny paragraph in the main Warehouse article? That list was a good review for people rewatching the series. Cpusavant ( talk) 18:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I think that the Episode List should be annexed into a separate article to avoid the main page getting longer than it should be. At the moment it is unneeded but doing it preemptively could be beneficial in the long run. Besides, this is how every other show I ever look at on Wikipedia does things, the have an article regarding basic plot, history, and characters (which are also annexed beyond the main cast) and then they have an article for an episode list (sometimes giving an article per episode but I don't think that is needed for this show). Thoughts? Jaj43123 ( talk) 01:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
A lot of the writers are on Twitter, and their tweets often mention who wrote which episode—particularly, with regard to the ones that this article currently lists as "TBA". Here's one from Bob Goodman, talking to Tamara Becher:
Thx @trbecher! "Implosion" is a goodie. W/"Burnout" 2nite, "Duped" by B Raab & @dblackanese in 2wks, & then your "Regrets", WH13 is ROCKIN!
This quote doesn't make it clear who wrote "Implosion" or "Burnout", but it does show that "Duped" was written by B. Raab and D. Hughes, and "Regrets" was written by Tamara Becher. There are also other sources that I recall coming across that corroborate that latter fact. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 06:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I've watched this show a few times, and I once heard them mention the "other 12 warehouses"? In my opinion that is significant enough to be mentioned, isn't it..? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.134.3 ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 22 September 2009
On the show's website at syfy.com there is a link that talks about each of the incarnations at http://www.syfy.com/warehouse13/history.php Kluckie ( talk) 03:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
There is also an inconsistancy with the origin date of Warehouse 13. In the pilot is it stated that it dates back to 1898. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redknight ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC) (I can't believe I forgot to click the signature button -- RedKnight ( talk) 00:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC))
Thanks for putting "At the end of the first season finale, it appears he may have been killed. His fate, however, is uncertain." on the main page. Asshats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.134.73 ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 23 September 2009
Yo, Wikipedia is the confluence of what a bunch of different people editing an article want. Do YOU like it when the plot of a TV show is ruined before you see it? I didn't think so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.12.36 ( talk) 01:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted the MAJOR spoilers in the characters section, if you want to put things like "it is revealed that ______ is working for _____ in the finale" please put it in a separate section so people who have not yet seen the episodes can still be surprised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.12.36 ( talk) 01:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
In reality, Wells is not "revealed to be a woman" on the show - instead, they established in the show that there were two H.G. Wells, Herbert George the author, and his sister, Helena, the creative genius that gave him the material to write about. I'm not sure if the entry here and in the H.G. Wells entry need to be re-written accordingly. Nolefan32 ( talk) 12:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
May be this music is close to the Opening titles music? 95.19.4.9 ( talk) 15:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi as mentioned int the article, both series play in the same universe, but how deeply are they involved? I have seen 3 actors from eureka in warehouse13 so far, but they don't have the charackternames from eureka (or at least I think so). Is that explained? I'm german and the show is not so far progressed. thx, -- 85.180.5.56 ( talk) 19:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
It has been established on screen that Warehouse 13 happens in the same continuity with Eureka (TV series) in the Warehouse 13 episode "13.1" and the Eureka episode "Crossing Over" so the article should mention this. -- Nerd42 ( talk) 03:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If the article can include details of the characters' backgrounds like a deaf sister and having an eye for detail then it can include information on the sexual orientation of a new character. The information is sourced to a reliable source and the constant removal smacks of censorship and homophobia. Stop taking it out. Matty Dean ( talk) 21:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The information about the character's sexual orientation is cited to a reliabvle source. It was wrongly taken out by a robot. It was restored and then removed repeatedly with the lie that it is "vandalism". Now the source is being attacked as unreliable. Out (magazine) has been a reliable source for almost two decades and any suggestion that it's not is another lie. I don't know why I've been subjected to repeated lies and attacks but I have to think that there's some homophobia at work. Matty Dean ( talk) 02:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
The mention of a deaf sister and and eye for detail have an impact on those characters and the story. At this point since the season has not started we do not know what impact his homosexuality will have on the development of the character. This has nothing to do with an unreliable source. If it turns out to be a major part of the character then it can be added at the appropriate time. Your actions on the other hand, are coming off as trying to make a statement, rather than the betterment of this article. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 02:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Not that my two cents is worth much here (not a fan), but I would tend to agree with the current consensus; the sexuality of a character that has yet to even be seen is hardly of relevance. Since Matty Dean focuses on the tacit, casual mentions of dating as being assumed hetero, I focus on the status of Max Blum of Happy Endings, who's being gay is barely relevant, as his status in the show is simply that as one of a group of six friends, even as the episode summaries on the list page casually mention his romantic pursuits with phrases like "not realizing that the new place is owned by Ian, the cute new guy he just started dating" or "Jane meddles in Max's love life when she thinks he's passing on the perfect guy"; while not shying away from his persuasion, it doesn't go so far in overtly focus on it, as it is not an overwhelming factor in his character like the sexuality of characters who's storylines are driven by their sexuality like Barney Stinson or Kurt Hummel. It's best to wait until we see if and how it factors in to the overall plot, since the article is about the overall, and not the minutia. KnownAlias X 19:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Jinks being gay came up in the episode "40th floor". While Jinks is alone with the captive female "FBI agent" he says something like "Even if I were interested in women, you would put me off". *Now* can we put it in the article? Naraht ( talk) 11:23, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Jinks explicitly tells Claudia he is gay when she thinks he is hitting on her. His mother states she is fine with it when visited. Then his ex-boyfriend shows up the next season. Stop disputing it. voi2258 ( talk) 4:28, 8 July 2013 (EST)
The first webisode "Of Monsters and Men: Part 1" just went up on the Syfy website and on Hulu. We should probably mention them on this page and on the episode list. (Apparently it's a 10-part series of webisodes.) -- V2Blast ( talk) 18:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey guys, wanted some input. I'm working on a draft of the merge at User:ComposerDude/Warehouse 13. Most of the article for the Pilot seems redundant in light of existing material on this page. The only recourse I see is to do season summaries, and severly edit the pilot plot section down under the season one heading. Thoughts? ComposerDude (TALKIE) *contribs 03:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Should we add the complete list of warehouse locations from http://www.syfy.com/warehouse13/history ? This could be either as simply the list of locations, the list and "numbering" or list, numbering and dates. Naraht ( talk) 11:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Why isn't Jinks included on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.189.160 ( talk) 22:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I was also wondering this? Why isn't Jinks mentioned in the article, it needs to be updated! 85.230.137.5 ( talk) 02:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
On screen, it has been established that Eureka and Warehouse 13 exist in the same universe starting with the 13.1 episode. However, the show still has no explanation of the presence of Joe Morton as Reverend John Hill in the episode Regrets while he is also one of the main characters in Eureka as Henry Deacon. Is he a twin? A clone? Genetically engineered?
Also, in this article's intro, it has been stated that Warehouse 13 did a crossover with another SyFy series Alphas. I'm not exactly sure if it is considered a crossover because I cannot recall Warehouse 13 being mentioned by Dr. Cadler. It could be the writers are only using her name as well as the same actor (X-Files).
With that again, is there are reference material to a press release statement where the producers of the show have stated that the three show indeed exist in the same fictional universe? Please add them up in the article if you find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Reyes ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I've removed the sentence about Warehouse 13 and Being Human being in the same universe. The citation listed mentions the same actor appearing in both shows, but as different characters.
Bwald (
talk) 02:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Someone deleted the List of Artifacts and Gadgets article. I think it should be restored. ZFT ( talk) 14:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Might "Warehouse 13" be better described as a fantasy series, since it deals with a warehouse and artifacts that have magical properties. (It could be classified perhaps as modern urban fantasy like "Buffy" or "Angel.") 203.56.94.11 ( talk) 06:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Until now, we've only had character articles for the main characters, ie those whose actor is credited as a main character per
MOS:TV. Today,
Helena G. Wells was created. Among other things, the author edited this article to move H.G.Wells into the mainadd H.G.Wells to the character section,
[1] (which only lists main characters) despite not being a main character. I reverted those changes and redirected the article to
List of Warehouse 13 characters#Helena G. Wells but the author has since restored the article. The problem with
Helena G. Wells is that the subject doesn't seem to meet the
general notability guidelines, relying almost entirely on episodes for sources. This might be marginally acceptable for a main character, but for a recurring character it simply isn't appropriate. There is no real-world treatment of the subject, other than mention of a
possible spin-off and mention of Myka's attraction to her by Joanne Kelly. The vast majority of the article is just in-universe discussion. If we advocate the creation of such articles, we're opening a can of worms; editors will feel free to create articles on any and all characters no matter how non-notable they are. Comments? --
AussieLegend (
talk) 10:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Based on the independent references that the author of the article has added, I think it's fair to say that the article meets WP:GNG. The character is that of a notable TV production, and while she is not a main character, it appears as though there is enough media coverage/reception/criticism to merit a standalone page. There's way too much relevant content to merge the character with the article on the show. That being said, there is quite a substantial bit of cleanup that needs to take place. Namely, the repeated use of references in-line when one citation can simply be added at the end of a paragraph or several sentences. I've discussed this issue with Electprogeny and it will be corrected. IShadowed ( talk) 22:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I wasn't sure how to show the sources for this information. However, you can read the Acknowledgements from the beginning of the novel on the Baen web site:
Dfmclean ( talk) 07:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Why isn't Mrs. Frederic listed in the Cast and Characters section? Surely her character is more central to the show than Daniel Dickinson. ( talk) 01:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Seems like a pretty odd omission. Everyone knows the character is gay. It's been addressed, discussed, and established many, many times throughout the characters run. I have made attempts at a minor edit and told my edit wasn't "constructive". What does that even mean? It's a fundamental character trait that should be included in his bio. It makes one wonder why people are so weary of an obviously true piece of information.
74.195.173.57 ( talk) 04:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
From the article:
Assuming what is meant is the center of administration of those empires, the Holy Roman Empire had three capitals during its long history none of which were Berlin. Since this passage is unsourced, may we assume that this is OR by someone who is guessing/ignorant of history? If what is meant is the geographical center...well, the three capitals were far closer than Berlin, which was rather out in the sticks to the far north and east of the geographical center. If it was actually stated incorrectly in the show that W8 was in Berlin, then we need a specific citation of the episode. The Syfy website being used as a source for some of the other claims in the same section does not even mention Berlin. 12.233.146.130 ( talk) 01:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I see nothing about the black actress who plays Mrs. Fredrickson, and her character is not listed!? She is the one who recruited the main characters, not a minor role. 68.108.55.155 ( talk) 19:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The Alibi is a recurring location where some of the show happens. Is this not a relevant bit of information? I thought that fans might like to know where the real bar is located, but two attempts to include this have been erased. If the edit is not quite right, please offer some advice, or help with the format instead of erasing it. Many people that go to a Facebook Warehouse 13 page were interested in the information about the real bar so I think that fans of the show in general would appreciate the inclusion of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tighelander ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | The article
Pilot (Warehouse 13) was
nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 18 July 2009 with a consensus to
merge the content into
Warehouse 13. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{
afd-merged-from}}. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Warehouse 13 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Warehouse 13. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Warehouse 13 at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does this show have any relation to the GURPS book Warehouse 23? The underlying concepts (what little is described so far) sound identical to the concepts of the sourcebook. ( 144.92.84.206 ( talk) 21:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC))
I believe a citation of similarity to The Librarian should be added since Friday the 13th: The Series is noted. When I watched the pilot I definately got a X-Files, Librarian, FTT:TS vibe from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.23.68.40 ( talk) 12:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
GURPS Warehouse 23 = This Show. Of course, Warehouse 23 = the warehouse at the end of Indiana Jones first movie. Regardless, though, it's like these guys read the Warehouse 23 book and said, "Hey, look, this is a functional script." 65.16.205.188 ( talk) 22:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Terry Whisenant (Austin, TX)
This show seems a little like the FOX show "Fringe" doesn't it? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.79.90.189 (
talk) 16:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
How do we know the cloak is "Fox" skin? It looks like deer to me. Sheherazahde ( talk) 06:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there a book to this series or are they just not out yet. I checked Amazon and could only find "Data Warehouse" suggestions (Darn preference history settings I guess - I hate those.) 71.236.26.74 ( talk) 09:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that both pilots should be put under the same heading in the table, though I'm not sure how one would go about formatting that properly. There are several reasons for this to happen. It wasn't really two episodes. Yes, it took 2 hours, but it was essentially just one, double length, episode. There was only one episodic story, and there wasn't a clear definition of where one "episode" would end, and the next begins. Furthermore, the plot description for the second pilot is lacking substance (because it's the same plot as the first).
Does anyone know how they could be merged properly? I've tried looking on other TV show pages, but most of them have only one hour pilots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.248.22 ( talk) 02:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
when looking at isohunt.com the pilot is listed in one file but labeled as episode 1 & 2. episode 3 is called resonance. the listing on wikipedia is confusing because of the difference. (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.41.192 ( talk)
"Scene" numbering is what fans expect to see when they come to a wiki, get with the times man... —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostMK ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, what indications do we have that the rugby ball is special? To me, on first viewing, the impression was given that that was an effect of the Warehouse and not the ball. Seems that 'items' would be too important to leave outside like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.57.202.221 ( talk) 12:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
What is the difference between a "rugby ball" and an American football? Sheherazahde ( talk) 18:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You must remember that there are many other Artifacts that are taken outside the warehouse. The tesla gun and the communications equipment for example. The warehouse is for devices that still need investigation and study before other's are ready to accept them.
I was under the impression that the ball was an ordinary rugby ball, and Artie and Pete were using the magnetic field surrounding the Warehouse to accelerate it fast enough to circle the earth. Just my impression, although there's no canon evidence either way... Kt'Hyla ( talk) 01:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
We just found out what the football is- it's an Artifact Tracker. During it's flight it collects information on artifacts worldwide and downloads the information as it passes over the warehouse. Saxophobia ( talk) 01:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
There are a number of artifacts that are not dangerous, and a number of them are in Artie's bag, that he carries around with him. My guess is that the ball is not dangerous, but Artie feels that it would not be very useful to him, so he tosses it around the world, instead of carring it with him. I get the impression that anything that has any supernatural power within it is taken to the warehouse; The ball could allow a team to win games unfairly and therefore needs to be kept out of the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.209.84 ( talk) 19:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Given the steampunk style and 'feel' very similar to that of Sanctuary (even the theme music!) it would be nice to have a citation for such a link. Anyone come across one though? -- AlisonW ( talk) 22:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
The items in every episode don't need to be listed, especially since only one or two actually have any relevance to the plot. Unlike The Lost Room, where the items are the focus, this show focuses more on getting the items. Things like the mirror, the football, laughing bell, and so forth have no effect on the plot, no more so than M. C. Escher designing the Warhouse's electrical grid (at least at the moment). As WP:TRIVIA notes, "Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information." These item lists apply. — Trust not the Penguin ( T | C) 19:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the football belongs on the list. It hasn't been expressly stated that the football is indeed an artifact. Another theory is that the football's ability to travel around the world when thrown may have more to do with the collected artifacts in the warehouse or possibly the location of the warehouse, but not the football itself. And that theory does bear argument since Artie is pretty anal about bagging, tagging and storing away even the most benign of artifacts, but he himself has been willing to throw the football. Ergo, until it's made clear outright that the football is indeed an artifact, I suggest taking it off the list. Or at least adding a line that it might possibly not be an artifact, but is instead affected by the other artifacts. Nolefan32 ( talk) 19:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Well seems that that effort went nowhere, it seems that people really want this detailed list. I'm going to move it to a separate page since it's getting pretty ridiculous, taking up half the article. Probably to Artifacts and gadgets from Warehouse 13. Xeworlebi ( t• c) 20:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
How come the full list of artifacts and gadgets was deleted and merged into one tiny paragraph in the main Warehouse article? That list was a good review for people rewatching the series. Cpusavant ( talk) 18:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I think that the Episode List should be annexed into a separate article to avoid the main page getting longer than it should be. At the moment it is unneeded but doing it preemptively could be beneficial in the long run. Besides, this is how every other show I ever look at on Wikipedia does things, the have an article regarding basic plot, history, and characters (which are also annexed beyond the main cast) and then they have an article for an episode list (sometimes giving an article per episode but I don't think that is needed for this show). Thoughts? Jaj43123 ( talk) 01:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
A lot of the writers are on Twitter, and their tweets often mention who wrote which episode—particularly, with regard to the ones that this article currently lists as "TBA". Here's one from Bob Goodman, talking to Tamara Becher:
Thx @trbecher! "Implosion" is a goodie. W/"Burnout" 2nite, "Duped" by B Raab & @dblackanese in 2wks, & then your "Regrets", WH13 is ROCKIN!
This quote doesn't make it clear who wrote "Implosion" or "Burnout", but it does show that "Duped" was written by B. Raab and D. Hughes, and "Regrets" was written by Tamara Becher. There are also other sources that I recall coming across that corroborate that latter fact. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 06:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I've watched this show a few times, and I once heard them mention the "other 12 warehouses"? In my opinion that is significant enough to be mentioned, isn't it..? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.134.3 ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 22 September 2009
On the show's website at syfy.com there is a link that talks about each of the incarnations at http://www.syfy.com/warehouse13/history.php Kluckie ( talk) 03:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
There is also an inconsistancy with the origin date of Warehouse 13. In the pilot is it stated that it dates back to 1898. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redknight ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC) (I can't believe I forgot to click the signature button -- RedKnight ( talk) 00:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC))
Thanks for putting "At the end of the first season finale, it appears he may have been killed. His fate, however, is uncertain." on the main page. Asshats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.134.73 ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 23 September 2009
Yo, Wikipedia is the confluence of what a bunch of different people editing an article want. Do YOU like it when the plot of a TV show is ruined before you see it? I didn't think so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.12.36 ( talk) 01:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted the MAJOR spoilers in the characters section, if you want to put things like "it is revealed that ______ is working for _____ in the finale" please put it in a separate section so people who have not yet seen the episodes can still be surprised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.12.36 ( talk) 01:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
In reality, Wells is not "revealed to be a woman" on the show - instead, they established in the show that there were two H.G. Wells, Herbert George the author, and his sister, Helena, the creative genius that gave him the material to write about. I'm not sure if the entry here and in the H.G. Wells entry need to be re-written accordingly. Nolefan32 ( talk) 12:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
May be this music is close to the Opening titles music? 95.19.4.9 ( talk) 15:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi as mentioned int the article, both series play in the same universe, but how deeply are they involved? I have seen 3 actors from eureka in warehouse13 so far, but they don't have the charackternames from eureka (or at least I think so). Is that explained? I'm german and the show is not so far progressed. thx, -- 85.180.5.56 ( talk) 19:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
It has been established on screen that Warehouse 13 happens in the same continuity with Eureka (TV series) in the Warehouse 13 episode "13.1" and the Eureka episode "Crossing Over" so the article should mention this. -- Nerd42 ( talk) 03:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If the article can include details of the characters' backgrounds like a deaf sister and having an eye for detail then it can include information on the sexual orientation of a new character. The information is sourced to a reliable source and the constant removal smacks of censorship and homophobia. Stop taking it out. Matty Dean ( talk) 21:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The information about the character's sexual orientation is cited to a reliabvle source. It was wrongly taken out by a robot. It was restored and then removed repeatedly with the lie that it is "vandalism". Now the source is being attacked as unreliable. Out (magazine) has been a reliable source for almost two decades and any suggestion that it's not is another lie. I don't know why I've been subjected to repeated lies and attacks but I have to think that there's some homophobia at work. Matty Dean ( talk) 02:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
The mention of a deaf sister and and eye for detail have an impact on those characters and the story. At this point since the season has not started we do not know what impact his homosexuality will have on the development of the character. This has nothing to do with an unreliable source. If it turns out to be a major part of the character then it can be added at the appropriate time. Your actions on the other hand, are coming off as trying to make a statement, rather than the betterment of this article. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 02:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Not that my two cents is worth much here (not a fan), but I would tend to agree with the current consensus; the sexuality of a character that has yet to even be seen is hardly of relevance. Since Matty Dean focuses on the tacit, casual mentions of dating as being assumed hetero, I focus on the status of Max Blum of Happy Endings, who's being gay is barely relevant, as his status in the show is simply that as one of a group of six friends, even as the episode summaries on the list page casually mention his romantic pursuits with phrases like "not realizing that the new place is owned by Ian, the cute new guy he just started dating" or "Jane meddles in Max's love life when she thinks he's passing on the perfect guy"; while not shying away from his persuasion, it doesn't go so far in overtly focus on it, as it is not an overwhelming factor in his character like the sexuality of characters who's storylines are driven by their sexuality like Barney Stinson or Kurt Hummel. It's best to wait until we see if and how it factors in to the overall plot, since the article is about the overall, and not the minutia. KnownAlias X 19:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Jinks being gay came up in the episode "40th floor". While Jinks is alone with the captive female "FBI agent" he says something like "Even if I were interested in women, you would put me off". *Now* can we put it in the article? Naraht ( talk) 11:23, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Jinks explicitly tells Claudia he is gay when she thinks he is hitting on her. His mother states she is fine with it when visited. Then his ex-boyfriend shows up the next season. Stop disputing it. voi2258 ( talk) 4:28, 8 July 2013 (EST)
The first webisode "Of Monsters and Men: Part 1" just went up on the Syfy website and on Hulu. We should probably mention them on this page and on the episode list. (Apparently it's a 10-part series of webisodes.) -- V2Blast ( talk) 18:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey guys, wanted some input. I'm working on a draft of the merge at User:ComposerDude/Warehouse 13. Most of the article for the Pilot seems redundant in light of existing material on this page. The only recourse I see is to do season summaries, and severly edit the pilot plot section down under the season one heading. Thoughts? ComposerDude (TALKIE) *contribs 03:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Should we add the complete list of warehouse locations from http://www.syfy.com/warehouse13/history ? This could be either as simply the list of locations, the list and "numbering" or list, numbering and dates. Naraht ( talk) 11:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Why isn't Jinks included on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.189.160 ( talk) 22:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I was also wondering this? Why isn't Jinks mentioned in the article, it needs to be updated! 85.230.137.5 ( talk) 02:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
On screen, it has been established that Eureka and Warehouse 13 exist in the same universe starting with the 13.1 episode. However, the show still has no explanation of the presence of Joe Morton as Reverend John Hill in the episode Regrets while he is also one of the main characters in Eureka as Henry Deacon. Is he a twin? A clone? Genetically engineered?
Also, in this article's intro, it has been stated that Warehouse 13 did a crossover with another SyFy series Alphas. I'm not exactly sure if it is considered a crossover because I cannot recall Warehouse 13 being mentioned by Dr. Cadler. It could be the writers are only using her name as well as the same actor (X-Files).
With that again, is there are reference material to a press release statement where the producers of the show have stated that the three show indeed exist in the same fictional universe? Please add them up in the article if you find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Reyes ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I've removed the sentence about Warehouse 13 and Being Human being in the same universe. The citation listed mentions the same actor appearing in both shows, but as different characters.
Bwald (
talk) 02:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Someone deleted the List of Artifacts and Gadgets article. I think it should be restored. ZFT ( talk) 14:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Might "Warehouse 13" be better described as a fantasy series, since it deals with a warehouse and artifacts that have magical properties. (It could be classified perhaps as modern urban fantasy like "Buffy" or "Angel.") 203.56.94.11 ( talk) 06:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Until now, we've only had character articles for the main characters, ie those whose actor is credited as a main character per
MOS:TV. Today,
Helena G. Wells was created. Among other things, the author edited this article to move H.G.Wells into the mainadd H.G.Wells to the character section,
[1] (which only lists main characters) despite not being a main character. I reverted those changes and redirected the article to
List of Warehouse 13 characters#Helena G. Wells but the author has since restored the article. The problem with
Helena G. Wells is that the subject doesn't seem to meet the
general notability guidelines, relying almost entirely on episodes for sources. This might be marginally acceptable for a main character, but for a recurring character it simply isn't appropriate. There is no real-world treatment of the subject, other than mention of a
possible spin-off and mention of Myka's attraction to her by Joanne Kelly. The vast majority of the article is just in-universe discussion. If we advocate the creation of such articles, we're opening a can of worms; editors will feel free to create articles on any and all characters no matter how non-notable they are. Comments? --
AussieLegend (
talk) 10:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Based on the independent references that the author of the article has added, I think it's fair to say that the article meets WP:GNG. The character is that of a notable TV production, and while she is not a main character, it appears as though there is enough media coverage/reception/criticism to merit a standalone page. There's way too much relevant content to merge the character with the article on the show. That being said, there is quite a substantial bit of cleanup that needs to take place. Namely, the repeated use of references in-line when one citation can simply be added at the end of a paragraph or several sentences. I've discussed this issue with Electprogeny and it will be corrected. IShadowed ( talk) 22:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I wasn't sure how to show the sources for this information. However, you can read the Acknowledgements from the beginning of the novel on the Baen web site:
Dfmclean ( talk) 07:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Why isn't Mrs. Frederic listed in the Cast and Characters section? Surely her character is more central to the show than Daniel Dickinson. ( talk) 01:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Seems like a pretty odd omission. Everyone knows the character is gay. It's been addressed, discussed, and established many, many times throughout the characters run. I have made attempts at a minor edit and told my edit wasn't "constructive". What does that even mean? It's a fundamental character trait that should be included in his bio. It makes one wonder why people are so weary of an obviously true piece of information.
74.195.173.57 ( talk) 04:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
From the article:
Assuming what is meant is the center of administration of those empires, the Holy Roman Empire had three capitals during its long history none of which were Berlin. Since this passage is unsourced, may we assume that this is OR by someone who is guessing/ignorant of history? If what is meant is the geographical center...well, the three capitals were far closer than Berlin, which was rather out in the sticks to the far north and east of the geographical center. If it was actually stated incorrectly in the show that W8 was in Berlin, then we need a specific citation of the episode. The Syfy website being used as a source for some of the other claims in the same section does not even mention Berlin. 12.233.146.130 ( talk) 01:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I see nothing about the black actress who plays Mrs. Fredrickson, and her character is not listed!? She is the one who recruited the main characters, not a minor role. 68.108.55.155 ( talk) 19:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The Alibi is a recurring location where some of the show happens. Is this not a relevant bit of information? I thought that fans might like to know where the real bar is located, but two attempts to include this have been erased. If the edit is not quite right, please offer some advice, or help with the format instead of erasing it. Many people that go to a Facebook Warehouse 13 page were interested in the information about the real bar so I think that fans of the show in general would appreciate the inclusion of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tighelander ( talk • contribs) 04:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)