This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This section is presented with giving any significance. Did these poeple somehow affect War Production in favor of the Soviets? Or? If the only point is to show that it had many spies, then we can do so in much less space. But I suspect that there is some tie-in that we should be mentioning. - Willmcw 19:19, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
What are the significance of all of the jobs listed after each alleged Soviet spy? For example:
These aren't all offices of the War Production Board, are they? - Willmcw 18:49, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Seeing as to how the soviets and the US were allies during World WAr II, I find it hard to believe that soviet intervention set out to vandalize US wartime production... :|
This article was vandalised and blanked by 170.158.170.246 and 66.242.230.91 (although the latter may have been only attempting to remove the vandalism).
that closed down almost all of the active gold mines in the United States. The emphasis during the war was on mining base metals and other strategic metals and minerals needed for the war effort. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co., 357 U.S. 155 (1958) United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co. No. 29 Argued January 7, 1958 Decided June 16, 1958 357 U.S. 155 Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. 134 Ct.Cl. 1, 130, 138 F.Supp. 281, 146 F.Supp. 476, reversed. Page 357 U. S. 156 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.126.111.38 ( talk) 13:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
WPB Order L-108 A couple of tags from machine tools http://jamesriser.com/Machinery/FrankenRiveter/Gorton3UWarFinishLabel3962.jpg http://cdn.stripersonline.com/d/d0/d05ba5bf_War_Finish.jpeg LeBlond had a painted on label, I have a 13" LeBlond 'trainer' lathe with the War Finish label but it's too bad of shape to make out anything beyond what it is, after being painted over then the paint peeled off. Lack of chrome or nickel plating, only rough grinding of non-critical surfaces, painting directly on the metal without any primer, no filler used to fill in casting defects and more reductions in the finish part of fit and finish to reduce costs and speed up production. Bizzybody ( talk) 02:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
The lead of the article states that the War Production Board was established in January 1942. The infobox states August 1941. Which is correct? I've tagged them with {{ contradictory}} to hopefully draw attention to this issue. Regards, DesertPipeline ( talk) 05:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This section is presented with giving any significance. Did these poeple somehow affect War Production in favor of the Soviets? Or? If the only point is to show that it had many spies, then we can do so in much less space. But I suspect that there is some tie-in that we should be mentioning. - Willmcw 19:19, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
What are the significance of all of the jobs listed after each alleged Soviet spy? For example:
These aren't all offices of the War Production Board, are they? - Willmcw 18:49, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Seeing as to how the soviets and the US were allies during World WAr II, I find it hard to believe that soviet intervention set out to vandalize US wartime production... :|
This article was vandalised and blanked by 170.158.170.246 and 66.242.230.91 (although the latter may have been only attempting to remove the vandalism).
that closed down almost all of the active gold mines in the United States. The emphasis during the war was on mining base metals and other strategic metals and minerals needed for the war effort. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co., 357 U.S. 155 (1958) United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co. No. 29 Argued January 7, 1958 Decided June 16, 1958 357 U.S. 155 Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. 134 Ct.Cl. 1, 130, 138 F.Supp. 281, 146 F.Supp. 476, reversed. Page 357 U. S. 156 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.126.111.38 ( talk) 13:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
WPB Order L-108 A couple of tags from machine tools http://jamesriser.com/Machinery/FrankenRiveter/Gorton3UWarFinishLabel3962.jpg http://cdn.stripersonline.com/d/d0/d05ba5bf_War_Finish.jpeg LeBlond had a painted on label, I have a 13" LeBlond 'trainer' lathe with the War Finish label but it's too bad of shape to make out anything beyond what it is, after being painted over then the paint peeled off. Lack of chrome or nickel plating, only rough grinding of non-critical surfaces, painting directly on the metal without any primer, no filler used to fill in casting defects and more reductions in the finish part of fit and finish to reduce costs and speed up production. Bizzybody ( talk) 02:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
The lead of the article states that the War Production Board was established in January 1942. The infobox states August 1941. Which is correct? I've tagged them with {{ contradictory}} to hopefully draw attention to this issue. Regards, DesertPipeline ( talk) 05:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)