From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suitability of Global Times pieces

@ Tigress223: given that you’ve taken ownership of the content the burden is on you to prove that the Global Times is a high quality source as required by WP:BLP. It has to satisfy WP:VERIFY etc, I look forward to hearing your argument. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 01:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Horse Eye Jack: Ah, was your edit pertaining to SPECIFICALLY Global Times being an unreliable source? I didn't know as you deleted articles that were also from Sina and 环球网. I see that they have been mislabeled, so I'll change them. The rest can go. Tigress223 t@lk 23:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suitability of Global Times pieces

@ Tigress223: given that you’ve taken ownership of the content the burden is on you to prove that the Global Times is a high quality source as required by WP:BLP. It has to satisfy WP:VERIFY etc, I look forward to hearing your argument. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 01:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Horse Eye Jack: Ah, was your edit pertaining to SPECIFICALLY Global Times being an unreliable source? I didn't know as you deleted articles that were also from Sina and 环球网. I see that they have been mislabeled, so I'll change them. The rest can go. Tigress223 t@lk 23:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook