![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed Dinosaur, Chicken Little, Meet the Robinsons and Bolt from offical classic cannon as there are notconsider offical classic cannon by the Disney corporation. Regardless of others views on "proper" cannon, the corporation does not recognizes its a classic, but rather a computer animated features. Please see Disney A to Z: The Offical Encyclopedia, Third Edition, by Dave Smith, page 33, and its supplement found here at page 55. Jvsett ( talk) 07:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Something doesn't add up... according to the list, Lilo & Stitch is the 42nd Animated Classic, but the Lilo & Stitch DVD box says it's the 41st. It looks like Dinosaur isn't supposed to be on the list, unless Disney decided to retroactively add it after Lilo & Stitch's release. Sock-fox ( talk) 17:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For discussions regarding the over-arching clean-up of the various Disney animated film lists, please see this WikiProjects page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Animated Film Article Cleanup. Please add any discussion regarding same there for the time being. Thank you. Jvsett ( talk) 04:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how to speak to you but what is wrong with Canon? Why do you have the authority to control the Disney page may I ask McDoob? What is wrong with that term? That is what the films are collectively called. Why can't I change the Rapunzel page? It is the 50th film in the CANON. I did not write anything derogatory or wrong, I wanted to change it to reflect the canon. It has to be 'produced by the studio' because you wrote it like that right? It is the 50th film, from the official Disney Animation website. What is the difference? It is cited on the main List of Disney theatrical animated features, I have to cite the fact that it is a part of the canon? Maybe you can do that since you control everything? I may note that the official website does not state 'Official List' so it's just your own choice right? I remember before that it was Official Canon, which sounds better to me. Admit it, you control the wording of everything. You just don't want anyone else messing up your work. I apologize if I am being rude, but you are just hiding behind the fact that I didn't cite anything. Cite what? When I change one word from list to canon when you already wrote it is named the canon?
Everyone should know that McDoob is a control freak. I'm sure he will delete this as well.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.66.13 ( talk) 05:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
So you are an editor of this page? How can I become an editor so that I can change this silly consensus? You mentioned that the films are known as the Canon so why is it too strong to use as the title? That's contradictory, fans know it as the Canon that is separated into different ages along with the Disney Renaissance. Why is the Renaissance undisputed then? I am also confused about the article that you quoted, doesn't it mention that Disney is going by B, which means that new films are being added to the list every year, thus it is a part of the overall canon? Did Disney officially say that "It is NOT a canon, it's just a list of films" ?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.66.13 ( talk) 07:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCATRE5511F920090602 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.33.255.86 ( talk) 17:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed Dinosaur, Chicken Little, Meet the Robinsons and Bolt from offical classic cannon as there are notconsider offical classic cannon by the Disney corporation. Regardless of others views on "proper" cannon, the corporation does not recognizes its a classic, but rather a computer animated features. Please see Disney A to Z: The Offical Encyclopedia, Third Edition, by Dave Smith, page 33, and its supplement found here at page 55. Jvsett ( talk) 07:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Something doesn't add up... according to the list, Lilo & Stitch is the 42nd Animated Classic, but the Lilo & Stitch DVD box says it's the 41st. It looks like Dinosaur isn't supposed to be on the list, unless Disney decided to retroactively add it after Lilo & Stitch's release. Sock-fox ( talk) 17:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For discussions regarding the over-arching clean-up of the various Disney animated film lists, please see this WikiProjects page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Animated Film Article Cleanup. Please add any discussion regarding same there for the time being. Thank you. Jvsett ( talk) 04:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how to speak to you but what is wrong with Canon? Why do you have the authority to control the Disney page may I ask McDoob? What is wrong with that term? That is what the films are collectively called. Why can't I change the Rapunzel page? It is the 50th film in the CANON. I did not write anything derogatory or wrong, I wanted to change it to reflect the canon. It has to be 'produced by the studio' because you wrote it like that right? It is the 50th film, from the official Disney Animation website. What is the difference? It is cited on the main List of Disney theatrical animated features, I have to cite the fact that it is a part of the canon? Maybe you can do that since you control everything? I may note that the official website does not state 'Official List' so it's just your own choice right? I remember before that it was Official Canon, which sounds better to me. Admit it, you control the wording of everything. You just don't want anyone else messing up your work. I apologize if I am being rude, but you are just hiding behind the fact that I didn't cite anything. Cite what? When I change one word from list to canon when you already wrote it is named the canon?
Everyone should know that McDoob is a control freak. I'm sure he will delete this as well.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.66.13 ( talk) 05:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
So you are an editor of this page? How can I become an editor so that I can change this silly consensus? You mentioned that the films are known as the Canon so why is it too strong to use as the title? That's contradictory, fans know it as the Canon that is separated into different ages along with the Disney Renaissance. Why is the Renaissance undisputed then? I am also confused about the article that you quoted, doesn't it mention that Disney is going by B, which means that new films are being added to the list every year, thus it is a part of the overall canon? Did Disney officially say that "It is NOT a canon, it's just a list of films" ?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.66.13 ( talk) 07:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCATRE5511F920090602 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.33.255.86 ( talk) 17:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)