![]() | WZZM has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 22, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WZZM article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This information is commonplace to nearly every news producing station in the nation. There are literally too many of these stations with this information listed to name here. User:Mvcg66b3r should respect this fact and stop removing this information unless a site wide effort is taken to remove it from all television station pages. There is no reason to single out this page for attack and not have the information listed. Reason WP:NOTTVGUIDE does not apply as this is not a program guide for the station, but a cited list of news productions similar to publishing schedule for a newspaper or list of productions for a national outlet like CNN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.8.48.8 ( talk) 00:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article nominated two days after promotion to GA. Passes
Copyvio check. Picture is free use. QPQ done. AGF on ALT0 offline source. I prefer ALT0, it's more interesting.
Riley1012 (
talk)
21:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | WZZM has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 22, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WZZM article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This information is commonplace to nearly every news producing station in the nation. There are literally too many of these stations with this information listed to name here. User:Mvcg66b3r should respect this fact and stop removing this information unless a site wide effort is taken to remove it from all television station pages. There is no reason to single out this page for attack and not have the information listed. Reason WP:NOTTVGUIDE does not apply as this is not a program guide for the station, but a cited list of news productions similar to publishing schedule for a newspaper or list of productions for a national outlet like CNN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.8.48.8 ( talk) 00:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis ( talk) 18:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article nominated two days after promotion to GA. Passes
Copyvio check. Picture is free use. QPQ done. AGF on ALT0 offline source. I prefer ALT0, it's more interesting.
Riley1012 (
talk)
21:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)