This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Vitamin A deficiency.
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raeganloheide.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"Non-animal sources of vitamin A which contain pre-formed vitamin A account for greater than 80% of intake for most individuals in the developing world."
Not correct, or just very badly worded. There are no non-animal sources of PREFORMED vitamin A; only non-animal sources of carotene, which can be converted into vitamin A.
Also, the link on reference #15 is bad. Here is the correct link, and a snippet: http://www.childinfo.org/vitamina.html "Dietary diversification: Non-animal sources of vitamin A account for greater than 80 per cent of intake for most individuals in the developing world. In order to meet the nutrition needs of children, intake of these sources would need to increase up to tenfold. Feasible control of deficiency through dietary diversification would require increased consumption of bioavailable, vitamin A-rich foods of animal origin, coupled with continued promotion of nutritious fruits and vegetables." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.61.39 ( talk) 18:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
The introduction doesn't need the information about how many children are affected around the world and the consequences thereof; it makes it read like a PSA. The information is not bad and doesn't need to be removed, but would putting it another section be a problem? 98.219.84.5 ( talk) 18:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
eg: "Approx 250,000 to 500,000" should be better written as "between x and y". the "approximate" definition seems to be watered down, i see it kind of often. approx did mean a large number of digits accuracy ie, approx 55.006%, now its very broad. Charlieb000 ( talk) 21:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
There should be full section in the article on food sources. WillNess ( talk) 10:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Does it have any meaning to display a world map with information about 1995? That was 24 years ago! Maybe we could extract updated data from WHO ( licence) or from UNICEF ( licence). I'm unsure if it's possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pabloab ( talk • contribs) 06:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Many of the refs are more than 20 years old, and some are not WP:MEDRS. David notMD ( talk) 21:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Vitamin A deficiency.
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raeganloheide.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"Non-animal sources of vitamin A which contain pre-formed vitamin A account for greater than 80% of intake for most individuals in the developing world."
Not correct, or just very badly worded. There are no non-animal sources of PREFORMED vitamin A; only non-animal sources of carotene, which can be converted into vitamin A.
Also, the link on reference #15 is bad. Here is the correct link, and a snippet: http://www.childinfo.org/vitamina.html "Dietary diversification: Non-animal sources of vitamin A account for greater than 80 per cent of intake for most individuals in the developing world. In order to meet the nutrition needs of children, intake of these sources would need to increase up to tenfold. Feasible control of deficiency through dietary diversification would require increased consumption of bioavailable, vitamin A-rich foods of animal origin, coupled with continued promotion of nutritious fruits and vegetables." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.61.39 ( talk) 18:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
The introduction doesn't need the information about how many children are affected around the world and the consequences thereof; it makes it read like a PSA. The information is not bad and doesn't need to be removed, but would putting it another section be a problem? 98.219.84.5 ( talk) 18:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
eg: "Approx 250,000 to 500,000" should be better written as "between x and y". the "approximate" definition seems to be watered down, i see it kind of often. approx did mean a large number of digits accuracy ie, approx 55.006%, now its very broad. Charlieb000 ( talk) 21:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
There should be full section in the article on food sources. WillNess ( talk) 10:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Does it have any meaning to display a world map with information about 1995? That was 24 years ago! Maybe we could extract updated data from WHO ( licence) or from UNICEF ( licence). I'm unsure if it's possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pabloab ( talk • contribs) 06:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Many of the refs are more than 20 years old, and some are not WP:MEDRS. David notMD ( talk) 21:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)