![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've replaced the notability and primary sources tag, which were removed by another editor recently. The addition of obituaries for the founder do not help much: the article is contains 5/9 primary sources. Anyone in the photography community knows that this is a hugely important place. On the other hand, anyone in the Wikipedia community knows that NCORP requires very good references and that primary sources aren't those, and that notability is not inherited. It's strange that there is not good coverage in the usual places. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I went ahead and replaced every primary source! I am going to remove that warning from the page and am leaving this message here for record. Media installation ( talk) 22:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I removed the tag because the issue concerning reliable secondary sources has been addressed. C.M.Wilkes ( talk) 18:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've replaced the notability and primary sources tag, which were removed by another editor recently. The addition of obituaries for the founder do not help much: the article is contains 5/9 primary sources. Anyone in the photography community knows that this is a hugely important place. On the other hand, anyone in the Wikipedia community knows that NCORP requires very good references and that primary sources aren't those, and that notability is not inherited. It's strange that there is not good coverage in the usual places. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I went ahead and replaced every primary source! I am going to remove that warning from the page and am leaving this message here for record. Media installation ( talk) 22:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I removed the tag because the issue concerning reliable secondary sources has been addressed. C.M.Wilkes ( talk) 18:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)